Votre recherche

This thesis explores the many ways indigenous religion is articulated, performed and translated in the video game Never Alone - Kisima Inŋitchuŋa (2014). The video game was among the first of its kind – being made in a close collaboration with an indigenous group, and published by the first indigenous owned video game company in the U.S.A. At launch, Never Alone gathered attention from traditional media in both North America and in Europe, and the game reached a global audience. Never Alone tells a story based on Inupiat storytelling, and Cultural Ambassadors gives the player an insight into Inupiat culture and tradition. Never Alone balances on the edge between the conventions of the video game medium and its genres, and of indigenous tradition and religion. This thesis examines how vocabularies that can be related to ‘indigenous religion’ are used and translated in Never Alone, and how these vocabularies relate to a globalizing discourse on indigenous religion. This thesis also explores how the medium of video games facilitates new ways of reclaiming traditions and articulating indigenous religion.

This article aims to answer two questions. The first is: What is a Sámi art museum? The second question considers whether there is no Sámi art museum, as assumed by the Nordnorsk kunstmuseum (NNKM) as the title of a museum performance and exhibition in 2017. To answer the first question, it is necessary to tell the long story of the Sámi cultural-historical museum in Karasjok, Samiid Vuorká-Dávvirat (SVD). This museum was inaugurated in 1972 as an act of resistance against the increasing assimilation politics towards the Sámi population in the post-war period. The building that was erected became a cultural and political centre, and a living cultural institution that housed the increasing Sámi ethno-political movement and its energy. Furthermore, as I will argue, the activity that took place at the site became a part of Sámi cultural heritage. The museum has also collected art since 1972 - a collection that today comprises 1400 artworks. Since the 1980s, various plans have been made for a Sámi art museum in a separate building, somehow connected to SVD, however, none of these plans have yet been realised. The article discusses the different reasons for this, and points to the connotations embedded in the SVD building as a cultural and political centre as one of the contributing factors. To answer the question of whether there is no Sámi art museum, a critical reading of the Nordnorsk kunstmuseum’s 2017 museum performance There Is No is necessary. My answer to the question is that NNKM, unfortunately, fell into several traps in their attempt to focus on the fact that there is no physical building. One such trap, that is very common in Western museums displaying indigenous art, is their use of traditional art-historical models as interpretive lenses when displaying indigenous art. A different concept of what an art museum could be today, as a place where things happen, where we could meet counter narratives, or Sámi art and culture could be presented as being part of the present as well as the past and future, would have been closer to a Sámi art museum. I offer this conclusion both through the deeper understanding of Sámi cultural and ethno-political movements as offered in the story of SVD, and through my reading of the theories of the indigenous American scholar John Paul Rangel. While there may indeed be no physical building claiming to be a Sámi art museum, it does in fact exist through the Sámi concept of árbevierru.

Fin des années 1960 aux Etats-Unis, les Indians of All Tribes impulsent un mouvement de contestations sociales qui a pour but la reconnaissance des droits inhérents aux peuples autochtones à la souveraineté et à l'auto-détermination. L'American Indian Movement et sa branche féminine Women of All Red Nations s'emparent de ces questions sociales, politiques et culturelles. Femmes et hommes entament de concert un processus d'émancipation dont l'accomplissement ne cesse d'être repoussé par les politiques assimilatrices successives du gouvernement états-unien. Au Canada aussi, des mobilisations collectives éclatent dans les années 1980 et 1990, et culminent avec les événements de Restigouche (1984) et la Crise d'Oka (1990). Ces évènements majeurs inspirent toute une jeune génération d'artistes autochtones et de femmes en particulier, formées notamment à l'Institute of American Indian Arts à Santa Fe (Nouveau-Mexique). De formations universitaires approfondies, elles développent des démarches artistiques transdisciplinaires à mi-chemin entre l'histoire de l'art et l'ethnographie. Elles mettent en évidence la porosité et la friabilité des frontières instaurées dans tous les secteurs par la société dominante contre les groupes considérés comme minoritaires. A cette fin, le photographique - par lequel nous désignons la pratique, la technique et l'image photographiques - devient un outil stratégique majeur de réappropriation et de réaffirmation de ce qu'elles sont et tendent à incarner. Ces artistes femmes interrogent grâce à ce médium les façons dont elles ont été représentées et se représentent elles-mêmes dans le cadre de démarches critiques des stéréotypes dont elles font l'objet depuis plusieurs siècles d'appropriation culturelle. Elles repensent par ce biais leurs identités, les rapports qu'elles entretiennent à leurs corps, à leurs sexualités et à leurs genres, à l'aune de leurs propres spiritualités. Grâce à leurs images artistiques et politiques, fruits de pratiques fondées sur une analogie entre la violation de leurs droits, l'exploitation de leurs terres et territoires, et les violences sexuelles dont elles font l'objet, elles continuent à prendre part aux mouvements de résistance actuels qui s'opposent aux projets extractivistes face auxquels elles s'affirment, une nouvelle fois, en première ligne. A partir d'un corpus iconographique de près de 400 œuvres réalisées entre 1969 et 2019, et d'entretiens individuels avec des artistes et des militantes femmes et queer autochtones des Etats-Unis et du Canada, cette thèse a pour objectif de montrer en quoi ces images - en particulier photographiques configurent des épistémologies nouvelles dans une perspective intersectionnelle, décoloniale et anticapitaliste, et s'inscrivent dans la continuité d'un processus de réaffirmation des droits inhérents des peuples autochtones, garantis par la Déclaration des Nations Unies sur les Droits des Peuples Autochtones (2007)

Artists and cultural practitioners from Indigenous communities around the world are increasingly in the international spotlight. As museums and curators race to consider the planetary reach of their art collections and exhibitions, this publication draws upon the challenges faced today by cultural workers, Indigenous and non-Indigenous, to engage meaningfully and ethically with the histories, presents and futures of Indigenous cultural practices and world-views. Sixteen Indigenous voices convene to consider some of the most burning questions surrounding this field. How will novel methodologies of word/voice-crafting be constituted to empower the Indigenous discourses of the future? Is it sufficient to expand the Modernist art-historical canon through the politics of inclusion? Is this expansion a new form of colonisation, or does it foster the cosmopolitan thought that Indigenous communities have always inhabited? To whom does the much talked-of 'Indigenous Turn' belong? Does it represent a hegemonic project of introspection and revision in the face of today's ecocidal, genocidal and existential crises?"--Page 4 de la couverture. Autres auteurs/titres:edited by Katya García-Antón ; contributors, Daniel Browning, Kabita Chakma, Megan Cope, Santosh Kumar Das, Hannah Donnelly, Léuli Māzyār Luna'i Eshrāghi, David Garneau, Biung Ismahasan, Kimberley Moulton, Máret Ánne Sara, Venkat Raman Singh Shyam, Irene Snarby, Ánde Somby, Megan Tamati-Quennell, Prashanta Tripura, Sontosh Bikash Tripura.

"Through innovative and critical research, this anthology inquires and challenges issues of race and positionality, empirical sciences, colonial education models, and indigenous knowledges. Chapter authors from diverse backgrounds present empirical explorations that examine how decolonial work and Indigenous knowledges disrupt, problematize, challenge, and transform ongoing colonial oppression and colonial paradigm. This book utilizes provocative and critical research that takes up issues of race, the shortfalls of empirical sciences, colonial education models, and the need for a resurgence in Indigenous knowledges to usher in a new public sphere. This book is a testament of hope that places decolonization at the heart of our human community." -- Prové de l'editor.

During the last five decades we have witnessed an increase in activity among artists identifying themselves as Sami, the only recognised indigenous people of Scandinavia. At the same time, art and duodji (traditional Sami art and craft) have been organized and institutionalized, not least by the Sami artists themselves.

Inuit have been participating in the development of photo-reproductive media since at least the 19th century, and indeed much earlier if we continue on Michelle Raheja’s suggestion that there is much more behind Nanook’s smile than Robert Flaherty would have us believe. This paper examines how photographer Peter Pitseolak (1902-1973) and filmmaker Zacharias Kunuk have employed photography and film in relation to Raheja’s notion of “visual sovereignty” as a process of infiltrating media of representational control, altering their principles to visualize Indigenous ownership of their images. For camera-based media, this pertains as much to conceptions of time, continuity and “presence,” as to the broader dynamics of creative retellings. This paper will attempt to address such media-ontological shifts – in Pitseolak’s altered position as photographer and the effect this had on his images and the “presence” of his subjects, and in Kunuk’s staging of oral histories and, through the nature of film as an experience of “cinematic time,” composing time in a way that speaks to Inuit worldviews and life patterns – as radical renegotiations of the mediating properties of photography and film. In that they displace the Western camera’s hegemonic framing and time-based structures, repositioning Inuit “presence” and relations to land within the fundamental conditions of photo-reproduction, this paper will address these works from a position of decolonial media aesthetics, considering the effects of their works as opening up not only for more holistic, community-grounded representation models, but for expanding these relations to land and time directly into the expanded sensory field of media technologies.