Votre recherche

Higher Education Institutions, like many other organizations, are facing pressure from the development of digital technologies as a push towards the digitization of their activities and towards a type of change that some describe as disruptive and that forces them to review their processes and structures. This article describes the case of the medialab of the University of Salamanca, MEDIALAB USAL, as an experience of new learning space in higher education. Its origin is explained from the experiences of citizen technology laboratories and experimental laboratories at the point of intersection between Art, Science and Technology. Its structure and working methods are explained, and its activities are illustrated through the description of four educational innovation projects based on different digital technologies: a mathematics didactics project using AppInventor, Wikipedia as a tool for knowledge generation, Arduino for innovation in the teaching of Fine Arts and a university Hackathon as an activity to introduce students to social and entrepreneurial innovation processes.

The aim of this study is to provide new insights into the social innovation (SI) development process in the context of social start-ups. A multiple case study identifies the issues and mechanisms for social start-ups to develop a social need into a potentially scalable innovation and to validate and scale it up, while avoiding a possible failure. Results show that key challenges faced by social start-ups can be characterized according to the stage of the SI development path. Firstly, social start-ups' failure can be caused by the lack of expertise in social problems and of flexible processes for social ventures creation; secondly, by the lack of awareness of SI benefits and proper resources allocation; and, finally, by a weak understanding of the impact and intangible outcomes of the developed SI in society, while ensuring its economic sustainability. Successfully overcoming these challenges requires social start-ups to put in place the following mechanisms: (1) leveraging a vision and motivations that balance tensions in terms of the radical, economic and cultural aspects of SI; (2) engaging the SI stakeholders in different (and sequential) phases of SI development process; and (3) identifying and adopting the most suitable technological, financial and communication tools in an integrated way.

The aim of this study is to provide new insights into the social innovation (SI) development process in the context of social start-ups. A multiple case study identifies the issues and mechanisms for social start-ups to develop a social need into a potentially scalable innovation and to validate and scale it up, while avoiding a possible failure. Results show that key challenges faced by social start-ups can be characterized according to the stage of the SI development path. Firstly, social start-ups' failure can be caused by the lack of expertise in social problems and of flexible processes for social ventures creation; secondly, by the lack of awareness of SI benefits and proper resources allocation; and, finally, by a weak understanding of the impact and intangible outcomes of the developed SI in society, while ensuring its economic sustainability. Successfully overcoming these challenges requires social start-ups to put in place the following mechanisms: (1) leveraging a vision and motivations that balance tensions in terms of the radical, economic and cultural aspects of SI; (2) engaging the SI stakeholders in different (and sequential) phases of SI development process; and (3) identifying and adopting the most suitable technological, financial and communication tools in an integrated way.

Ce document se veut un guide de référence pour le PIC phase 2 qui présente ses éléments les plus importants afin que toute la communauté PIC s’appuie sur des principes directeurs et des apprentissages communs.

Ce document se veut un guide de référence pour le PIC phase 2 qui présente ses éléments les plus importants afin que toute la communauté PIC s’appuie sur des principes directeurs et des apprentissages communs.

Site de la Chaire In.SITU | Recherche-innovation en stratégies intégrées Transports-Urbanisme de l'ESG UQAM Accès à des publications académiques, rapports et études, et les Cahiers In.SITU Cahier 1 - Les conditions de réussite d’un TOD : Retour sur la journée de réflexion du 28 janvier 2016 (TOD : transit-oriented development) Cahier 2 - Vivre et se déplacer, d’hier à aujourd’hui Montréal et Boucherville en exemples Cahier 3 - Portrait des disparités en matière de mobilité dans l’agglomération de Montréal Cahier 4 - Étude sur les facteurs et politiques de mobilité durable : le cas de la dépossession et réduction de l’usage de l’automobile Cahier 5 - La gestion de la demande : Revue des pratiques Cahier 6 - Inventaire illustré et raisonné de la gestion de la demande Cahier 7 - La gestion de la demande : analyse critique d’un registre d’action collective

Site de la Chaire In.SITU | Recherche-innovation en stratégies intégrées Transports-Urbanisme de l'ESG UQAM Accès à des publications académiques, rapports et études, et les Cahiers In.SITU Cahier 1 - Les conditions de réussite d’un TOD : Retour sur la journée de réflexion du 28 janvier 2016 (TOD : transit-oriented development) Cahier 2 - Vivre et se déplacer, d’hier à aujourd’hui Montréal et Boucherville en exemples Cahier 3 - Portrait des disparités en matière de mobilité dans l’agglomération de Montréal Cahier 4 - Étude sur les facteurs et politiques de mobilité durable : le cas de la dépossession et réduction de l’usage de l’automobile Cahier 5 - La gestion de la demande : Revue des pratiques Cahier 6 - Inventaire illustré et raisonné de la gestion de la demande Cahier 7 - La gestion de la demande : analyse critique d’un registre d’action collective

Pour atteindre ses objectifs, il est crucial que le Québec place la recherche et développement (R&D) au cœur de sa démarche. La science doit être au centre des décisions. Dans cette optique, la recherche-action, issue d’une collaboration entre acteurs de la recherche et des milieux de pratique, doit continuer à représenter une avenue de choix pour développer des connaissances axées sur les besoins du terrain. L’organisation des ateliers du forum fait d’ailleurs état de 1. Introduction : grandes lignes du forum cette volonté partenariale. Il est enfin nécessaire d’adopter une approche de sensibilisation et de communication qui soit positive. Ceci en axant le discours autour de la protection de l’environnement

Pour atteindre ses objectifs, il est crucial que le Québec place la recherche et développement (R&D) au cœur de sa démarche. La science doit être au centre des décisions. Dans cette optique, la recherche-action, issue d’une collaboration entre acteurs de la recherche et des milieux de pratique, doit continuer à représenter une avenue de choix pour développer des connaissances axées sur les besoins du terrain. L’organisation des ateliers du forum fait d’ailleurs état de 1. Introduction : grandes lignes du forum cette volonté partenariale. Il est enfin nécessaire d’adopter une approche de sensibilisation et de communication qui soit positive. Ceci en axant le discours autour de la protection de l’environnement

Une théorie du changement est un outil qui vous aide à décrire les changements que vous voulez voir se produire et la manière dont vous comptez y parvenir. Plus spécifiquement, elle vous aide à décrire le problème que vous essayez de résoudre, les changements que vous voulez opérer (vos résultats) et ce que vous allez mettre en place pour pouvoir y arriver (activités). Elle est une représentation dynamique et une illustration du comment et du pourquoi il est envisagé que le changement désiré s’opère dans un contexte particulier.

Découvrez et téléchargez l'impact gaps canvas qui aidera les entrepreneurs d'impact à comprendre et valider votre impact. Une théorie du changement est un outil qui vous aide à décrire les changements que vous voulez voir se produire et la manière dont vous comptez y parvenir. Plus spécifiquement, elle vous aide à décrire le problème que vous essayez de résoudre, les changements que vous voulez opérer (vos résultats) et ce que vous allez mettre en place pour pouvoir y arriver (activités). Elle est une représentation dynamique et une illustration du comment et du pourquoi il est envisagé que le changement désiré s’opère dans un contexte particulier.

À l’ère de la transformation numérique et de l’intelligence artificielle, les données et les enjeux qu’elles soulèvent sont sous les feux de la rampe, qu’il s’agisse de données ouvertes ou de données massives (big data). Motivé par le potentiel de leur mise en commun, un nombre croissant d’acteurs publics, privés et de la société civile s’intéresse au partage de données numériques entre tiers pour atteindre des objectifs d’intérêt public ou résoudre des problèmes sociaux complexes. De nouvelles formes de collaboration interorganisationnelle émergent chaque jour en vue de partager, combiner, croiser et valoriser des jeux de données. Ces partenariats de données numériques demandent toutefois temps, efforts, ressources et une collaboration soutenue. Leur succès exige également la mise en place d’une solide gouvernance des données apte à protéger le public et maintenir sa confiance. Les organisations désireuses de se lancer dans de telles initiatives trouveront dans le présent rapport une discussion des différents facteurs de succès et d’activation des partenariats de données numériques ainsi que des informations pratiques pour les guider dans la construction d’une gouvernance des données partagées qui soit collaborative, responsable, efficace et imputable.

À l’ère de la transformation numérique et de l’intelligence artificielle, les données et les enjeux qu’elles soulèvent sont sous les feux de la rampe, qu’il s’agisse de données ouvertes ou de données massives (big data). Motivé par le potentiel de leur mise en commun, un nombre croissant d’acteurs publics, privés et de la société civile s’intéresse au partage de données numériques entre tiers pour atteindre des objectifs d’intérêt public ou résoudre des problèmes sociaux complexes. De nouvelles formes de collaboration interorganisationnelle émergent chaque jour en vue de partager, combiner, croiser et valoriser des jeux de données. Ces partenariats de données numériques demandent toutefois temps, efforts, ressources et une collaboration soutenue. Leur succès exige également la mise en place d’une solide gouvernance des données apte à protéger le public et maintenir sa confiance. Les organisations désireuses de se lancer dans de telles initiatives trouveront dans le présent rapport une discussion des différents facteurs de succès et d’activation des partenariats de données numériques ainsi que des informations pratiques pour les guider dans la construction d’une gouvernance des données partagées qui soit collaborative, responsable, efficace et imputable.

This webinar includes the experiences and insights from two Québec-based organizations with an approach that yields a huge potential for transformative change.

This webinar includes the experiences and insights from two Québec-based organizations with an approach that yields a huge potential for transformative change.

Background Social innovations in health are inclusive solutions to address the healthcare delivery gap that meet the needs of end users through a multi-stakeholder, community-engaged process. While social innovations for health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovation. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. Methods and findings The research checklist was developed through a 3-step community-engaged process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a 3-round modified Delphi process. The call for entries solicited checklists and related items and was open between November 27, 2019 and February 1, 2020. In addition to the open call submissions and scoping review findings, a 17-item Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR) Checklist was developed based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist. The checklist was then refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys conducted between May and June 2020. The resulting checklist will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting, increase end-user engagement, and help assess social innovation projects. A limitation of the open call was requiring internet access, which likely discouraged participation of some subgroups. Conclusions The SIFHR Checklist will strengthen the reporting of social innovation for health research studies. More research is needed on social innovation for health.

Although healthcare managers make increasingly difficult decisions about health innovations, the way they may interact with innovators to foster health system sustainability remains underexplored. Drawing on the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework, this paper analyses interviews ( n=37) with Canadian and Brazilian innovators to identify: how they operationalize inclusive design processes; what influences the responsiveness of their innovation to system-level challenges; and how they consider the level and intensity of care required by their innovation. Our qualitative findings indicate that innovators seek to: 1) engage stakeholders at an early ideation stage through context-specific methods combining both formal and informal strategies; 2) address specific system-level benefits but often struggle with the positioning of their solution within the health system; and 3) mitigate staff shortages in specialized care, increase general practitioners’ capacity or patients and informal caregivers’ autonomy. These findings provide empirical insights on how healthcare managers can promote and organize collaborative processes that harness innovation towards more sustainable health systems. By adopting a RIH-oriented managerial role, they can set in place more inclusive design processes, articulate key system-level challenges, and help innovators adjust the level and intensity of care required by their innovation.

Although healthcare managers make increasingly difficult decisions about health innovations, the way they may interact with innovators to foster health system sustainability remains underexplored. Drawing on the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework, this paper analyses interviews ( n=37) with Canadian and Brazilian innovators to identify: how they operationalize inclusive design processes; what influences the responsiveness of their innovation to system-level challenges; and how they consider the level and intensity of care required by their innovation. Our qualitative findings indicate that innovators seek to: 1) engage stakeholders at an early ideation stage through context-specific methods combining both formal and informal strategies; 2) address specific system-level benefits but often struggle with the positioning of their solution within the health system; and 3) mitigate staff shortages in specialized care, increase general practitioners’ capacity or patients and informal caregivers’ autonomy. These findings provide empirical insights on how healthcare managers can promote and organize collaborative processes that harness innovation towards more sustainable health systems. By adopting a RIH-oriented managerial role, they can set in place more inclusive design processes, articulate key system-level challenges, and help innovators adjust the level and intensity of care required by their innovation.

This study seeks to unpack the formation mechanisms of social innovation (SI) initiatives in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Subsequently, this study employs a qualitative case study to investigate (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca. Previous research indicated that socio-spatial dynamics are critical for the development of SI initiatives. Furthermore, previous research asserted that universities are imperative to SI in the context of Latin America. Nevertheless, previous research contemplating the formation mechanisms of SI was primarily westerncentric and displayed an inadequacy to acknowledge SI in the context of Latin America. Based on previous research this study presents a theoretical framework that classifies the results in eight typologies based on (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages. All three dimension are classified as either "high" or "low", which grants insights into influential formation mechanisms. Subsequently, a sample of n=10 SI initiatives was compiled and twelve semi-structured interviews with representatives of the SI initiatives were conducted. The results indicate three typologies of SI initiatives. Five SI initiatives were classified as: HLH – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. Four initiatives were classified as: LHH – low local embedding, high trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. One initiative was classified as HLL – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, low university linkages. The results indicate that SI initiatives either seek to address local challenges or direct their efforts to trans-local challenges. Furthermore, universities evidently play a critical role in the formation of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca and Mexico. This study contributes to SI literature by presenting evidence that universities possess critical roles in the formation of SI. Future research should increasingly embed universities into theoretical approaches when investigating SI formation mechanism in Latin America.

This study seeks to unpack the formation mechanisms of social innovation (SI) initiatives in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Subsequently, this study employs a qualitative case study to investigate (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca. Previous research indicated that socio-spatial dynamics are critical for the development of SI initiatives. Furthermore, previous research asserted that universities are imperative to SI in the context of Latin America. Nevertheless, previous research contemplating the formation mechanisms of SI was primarily westerncentric and displayed an inadequacy to acknowledge SI in the context of Latin America. Based on previous research this study presents a theoretical framework that classifies the results in eight typologies based on (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages. All three dimension are classified as either "high" or "low", which grants insights into influential formation mechanisms. Subsequently, a sample of n=10 SI initiatives was compiled and twelve semi-structured interviews with representatives of the SI initiatives were conducted. The results indicate three typologies of SI initiatives. Five SI initiatives were classified as: HLH – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. Four initiatives were classified as: LHH – low local embedding, high trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. One initiative was classified as HLL – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, low university linkages. The results indicate that SI initiatives either seek to address local challenges or direct their efforts to trans-local challenges. Furthermore, universities evidently play a critical role in the formation of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca and Mexico. This study contributes to SI literature by presenting evidence that universities possess critical roles in the formation of SI. Future research should increasingly embed universities into theoretical approaches when investigating SI formation mechanism in Latin America.