RaccourSci - 10 étapes pour créer votre atelier participatif - Champoux, Estelle
Professeure de biologie cellulaire et de communication scientifique, je constate tous les jours que l’approche participative favorise le plaisir d’apprendre et de comprendre les sciences. Si les grands centres de sciences ont tous pris ce tournant, c’est parce que cela fonctionne. Allez par exemple faire un tour au Centre Pompidou à Paris, au Science World à Vancouver, ou au Centre des Sciences à Montréal, c’est très inspirant! Mais comment planifier un atelier participatif lorsqu’on est un communicateur-trice scientifique avec pour seuls outils son clavier et de maigres moyens? Votre atout le plus utile est sans doute votre créativité. Je vous propose ici une procédure simple pour structurer et créer votre premier atelier participatif.
RaccourSci est une plateforme en français qui s’adresse à tous les étudiant-e-s et chercheur-euse-s, souhaitant en apprendre davantage pour exprimer de manière claire, simple et concise le fruit de longues années de recherches. C’est ainsi que RaccourSci crée des ponts entre sciences et société.
Keywords: Animation; Participation; science; vulgarisation

Responsible innovation in health: concepts and tools for sustainable impact - Lehoux, Pascale; Rivard, Lysanne; Silva, Hudson P. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2022)

A New Era of Indigenous Research: Community-based Indigenous Research Ethics Protocols in Canada - Hayward, Ashley; Sjoblom, Erynne; Sinclair, Stephanie; Cidro, Jaime (Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2021)
Indigenous communities across Canada have established principles to guide ethical research within their respective communities. Thorough cataloging and description of these would inform university research ethics boards, researchers, and scholars and facilitate meaningful research that respects Indigenous-defined ethical values. A scoping study was conducted of all relevant peer-reviewed literature and public-facing Indigenous research ethical guidelines from First Nations, Metis, and Inuit communities and organizations in Canada. A total of 20 different Indigenous research ethics boards, frameworks, and protocols were identified. Analysis resulted in three key themes: (1) balancing individual and collective rights; (2) upholding culturally-grounded ethical principles; and (3) ensuring community-driven/self-determined research. Findings demonstrate how employment of Indigenous ethical principles in research positively contributes to research outcomes.

Guide pratique - Stratégie de partenariat avec les patients et le public en recherche - Grégoire, David G. (2018)
Keywords: Partenariat; Patient partenaire; Santé

Social Innovation Unlocked - Une trousse à outils d'animation pour les innovateurs sociaux - Social Innovation Canada (Social Innovation Unlocked)
Une trousse à outils mise en ligne par Social Innovation Canada qui donne accès à plus de 50 ressources rassemblées par la communautés et libre d'accès.
Keywords: Animation; Libre accès; Outils

Boussole de la justice épistémique - Guide d'utilisation - Manon, Mathilde; Autin, Grégoire; Parole d'excluEs (Incubateur universitaire parole d'excluEs, 2023)
La boussole de la justice épistémique vise à outiller tout groupe souhaitant réfléchir à de la place des différents savoirs dans son action et ses pratiques. Elle propose d’explorer des pistes pour augmenter la diversité des savoirs et des acteurs·trices au sein de nos collectifs. Cet outil a pour vocation de renforcer la participation de personnes et de groupes habituellement inaudibles ou invisibilisés aux actions et aux décisions qui les concernent. La justice épistémique est donc une composante essentielle de la justice sociale et de la démocratie.
Keywords: Communautés; Justice épistémique; Outils

Défi territoire – Chemins de Transition

Dewemaagannag : mes relations Guide pour l'engagement avec les peuples Autochtones - Concordia University
Ce guide est un outil d'auto-réflexion qui offre des principes directeurs et valeurs pour les chercheurs et étudiants non-Autochtones qui souhaitent décoloniser les relations avec les communautés autochtones.

Guide - Comment animer un atelier - Fédération des aînées et aînés francophones du Canada (2014)
Le Guide d’animation est indispensable à toute personne désireuse d’animer des ateliers. Il propose à l’animateur différentes techniques et comprend des recommandations utiles pour la planification d’un atelier et des stratégies d’animation. Il suggère également la tenue d’un journal de bord pour chaque circonstance.

Réussir le démarrage d’une communauté de pratique – CEPPP

Trousse d'accompagnement au changement d'échelle - TIESS (2022)
Cette trousse contient de nombreuses ressources pour sensibiliser un porteur ou une porteuse de projet aux stratégies de changement d’échelle (CÉ) et l’accompagner pas à pas dans sa démarche de diversification, d’essaimage, de création de franchise, de coopération ou autre
Propose de nombreux outils de sensibilisation au changement d'échelle, d'animation de formation ou d'atelier sur cette thématique, et d'accompagnement dans cette phase charnière de développement dans la vie d'un organisme à vocation sociale:

Changer d'échelle en économie sociale - Planifier l’essor et décupler les retombées de votre entreprise d’économie sociale - TIESS (2017)
En économie sociale, le Québec innove depuis longtemps. Au fil des années, des entreprises d’économie sociale ont développé des modèles qui se sont répandus à travers la province et qui ont même suscité un intérêt à l’étranger. Et cela continue ! Les idées, les communautés mobilisées et les promoteurs de projets engagés continuent d’enrichir le secteur de l’économie sociale. Mais comment augmenter la portée de leur travail ? Comment en faire profiter davantage de gens ? Comment aider les entreprises d’économie sociale à prendre une place encore plus importante, à consolider leurs assises et à avoir une participation accrue à une économie plus démocratique au service des collectivités ?
Propose en premier lieu la démystification du concept de changement d'échelle, les différentes stratégies qui peuvent être mobilisées pour le réaliser, appuyés par des exemples concrets et fictifs et des ressources pour appuyer une démarche de changement d'échelle tout au long des diverses étapes du parcours

The Sacred and the Limits of the Technological Fix - Drengson, Alan R. (Zygon®, 1984)
Abstract. Three points are discussed: first, that limits of technological fixes are revealed by current economic, social, and environmental problems; second, that these problems cannot be solved by a technological fix but require alternative forms of activity and being; third, that realizing these limits makes possible the re-emergence of the sacred. Two attitudes toward technology, nature, and the sacred are described: Technocrats desacralize nature and strive to shape it technologically for human ends alone; pernetarians resacralize nature and develop a perennial philosophy (synthesized from elements of different spiritual disciplines) allied with an enlarged, artful science, so as to design activities compatible with nature.

Outil d’appréciation des effets de l’action intersectorielle locale - CACIS; Communagir; Tables de quartier de Montréal

Études autochtones - Université de Montréal (Bibliothèques - Université de Montréal)

La Boîte à outils décoloniale : Le parcours éducatif (Mikana)

Laboratoire d'innovation - Université de Montréal (Construire l'avenir durablement, 2023)

Consortium santé numérique - Université de Montréal (Consortium santé numérique - Université de Montréal, 2023)
e Consortium Santé Numérique vise à assurer la coordination et les échanges entre les structures de l’ensemble du réseau de l’Université de Montréal impliquées dans le domaine de la santé numérique, tout en favorisant les liens avec les parties prenantes externes.

Grille de réflexivité portant sur les enjeux éthiques des systèmes d’intelligence artificielle (SIA) - Université Laval (Observatoire international sur les impacts sociétaux de l'IA et du numérique, 2021)
Des membres de la communauté scientifique de l’Observatoire international sur les impacts sociétaux de l’IA et du numérique (OBVIA) ont élaboré une grille de réflexivité portant sur les enjeux…

Vérification du lien

Guide des principes d’innovation et d’intelligence artificielle responsables en santé - CHUM (École de l'intelligence artificielle en santé)
Le guide des principes en innovation et IA responsables en santé et le formulaire d’auto-évaluation sont des outils, co-créés par le CHUM et plus de 60 collaborateurs, pour accompagner la réflexion des innovateurs à chaque étape du cycle d’innovation incluant la conception, l’expérimentation, l’implantation et la pérennisation des innovations.

Déclaration de Montréal pour un développement responsable de l'IA

Subventions - Secteur sciences humaines et sociales - La recherche - Université de Montréal

Ressources pour les équipes de recherche - Université de Montréal (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Principaux concours et outils pour le secteur des sciences et technologies (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Principaux concours et outils pour le secteur de la santé (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Principaux concours et outils pour le secteur des sciences humaines et sociales (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Subventions de recherche en partenariat | Services à la recherche, à la création et à l'innovation

Théorie du changement - TIESS (2018)
ISBN 978-2-924879-03-0

Au-delà de l'inclusion - L'équité dans la mobilisation du public - Un guide pour les mobilisateurs - Centre Morris J. Wosk pour le dialogue de l'Université Simon Fraser (2020)
Huit principes sont proposés dans le présent rapport pour contribuer à l’inclusion véritable et équitable de voix diverses lors de la planification et de la mise en œuvre d’initiatives de mobilisation qui éclaireront les processus de prise de décisions. Les idées présentées ici ont été élaborées dans le cadre de recherches et consultations participatives menées par le Centre Morris J. Wosk pour le dialogue de l’Université Simon Fraser entre mai 2019 et janvier 2020, avec entre autres sept groupes de discussion avec des membres de la communauté et des représentants des gouvernements et de la société civile, l’examen de plus de 40 ressources pertinentes et des entrevues avec 13 mobilisateurs communautaires.
ISBN: 978-1-77287-076-3

Guide des laboratoires d'innovation sociale - McConnell Foundation (McConnell Foundation, 2015)
Le 19 juin, une partenaire de longue date de la fondation, Frances Westley, et le Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience (WISIR) ont publié le Social Innovation Lab Guide. Le guide a été produit avec le soutien de la Fondation Rockefeller et de La fondation de la famille J.W. McConnell, et la participation de spécialistes de […]

Stakeholder engagement primer: 2. Identifying stakeholders - Bammer, Gabriele (Integration and Implementation Insights, 2021)
How can all those who have something relevant to contribute to a research project be identified? In particular, how can we find those who, through their experience of being affec…

Stakeholder engagement primer: 2. Identifying stakeholders – Integration and Implementation Insights - Bammer, Gabriele (Integration and Implementation Insights)

En Commun
Plateformes éthiques pour connecter les savoirs et les personnes pour une société plus équitable et écologique, par Projet collectif.

Evaluating social innovation prototypes : A guide - SI, Social Innovation Canada (2022)

Experimentation - NESTA (nesta)
An experiment is a way of trying something new while putting in place the necessary structures to find out if it works. There are a wide range of experimental methods available, with varying degrees of rigour.

Social experimentation - Publications Office of the EU

Getting to moonshot - Rajasekaran, Vinod

Why there’s no innovation without experimentation - UNHCR Innovation

The Open Book of Social Innovation - Murray, Robin; Caulier-Grice, Julie; Mulgan, Geoff (2010)
This volume – part of a series of methods and issues in social innovation – describes the hundreds of methods and tools for innovation being used across the world, as a first step to developing a knowledge base.
Chapitre. 3

Capturing Complexity Complexities in Health Promotion Intervention Research: Conducting Critical Realist Evaluation realists Evaluation - Frohlich, Katherine L.; St-Arneault, Kate; St-Pierre, Mikael (Global Handbook of Health Promotion Research, Vol. 1: Mapping Health Promotion Research, 2022)
The circumstances in which everyday life takes place shapes people’s capacity to lead healthy lives. We posit that the traditional linear way of thinking about causes and consequences limits our ability to fully capture the complexity of the interaction between people and their contextual circumstances in the production of health. We view critical realism as particularly helpful in understanding how problems are generated by this interaction as well as understanding the fit and responsiveness of our interventions to situational contexts. Such a perspective requires systematically attempting to “unpack” how different settings are shaped by health promotion interventions and how this is experienced by people. Accessing and mobilising such knowledge also requires particular sets of methods that deviate from what is still often seen as the gold standard for designing and evaluating interventions. Critical realism therefore shifts the primary focus of health promotion research from questions about “if” interventions work to questions about “how”, “why” and “under what circumstances” they can work. By helping to capture complexity in health promotion intervention research, a critical realist perspective leads to the production of rigorous knowledge without having to succumb to concerns about standardisation.
Keywords: Healthy cities; Outdoor free-play; Participatory planning

Que nous apprend l’approche systémique pour concevoir et agir sur le monde? - MIS (Maison de l'innovation sociale, 2021)
Pour cette édition, Raccords dédie un espace de réflexion et d’échange à l’impact systémique, un objectif central à la démarche d’innovation sociale.

Évaluer les retombées des changements systémiques - Cabaj, Mark (Tamarack Institute)
Les innovatrices et innovateurs sociaux, les évaluatrices et évaluateurs ainsi que les agent-e-s de changement sont de plus en plus appelés à transformer des systèmes complexes. Toutefois, ces actrices et acteurs ont souvent de la difficulté à décrire ces systèmes ou encore les retombées qu’ils espèrent générer. Cet article explique comment évaluer les changements systémiques, en plus de décrire trois catégories de résultats que les innovatrices et innovateurs sociaux ainsi que les évaluatrices et évaluateurs devraient considérer comme essentiels à leur travail.

Social Innovation - Lee, Peter (Washington University Law Review, 2014)
This Article provides the first legal examination of the immensely valuable but underappreciated phenomenon of social innovation. Innovations such as cognitive behavioral therapy, microfinance, and strategies to reduce hospital-based infections greatly enhance social welfare yet operate completely outside of the patent system, the primary legal mechanism for promoting innovation. This Article draws on empirical studies to elucidate this significant kind of innovation and explore its divergence from the classic model of technological innovation championed by the patent system. In so doing, it illustrates how patent law exhibits a rather crabbed, particularistic conception of innovation. Among other characteristics, innovation in the patent context is individualistic, arises from a discrete origin and history, and prioritizes novelty. Much social innovation, however, arises from communities rather than individual inventors, evolves from multiple histories, and entails expanding that which already exists from one context to another. These  Professor of Law and Chancellor’s Fellow, UC Davis School of Law. I would like to thank Camilla Hrdy, Chris Griffin, Richard Gruner, Courtney Joslin, Lydia Loren, Manesh Patel, and Darien Shanske for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. This Article benefitted substantially from presentations at the Intellectual Property Scholars Conference at Cardozo Law School, the East Bay Faculty Workshop, the Works in Progress Intellectual Property colloquium at Santa Clara School of Law, IP in The Trees at Lewis & Clark Law School, PatCon 4 at the University of San Diego School of Law, the Value Pluralism and Intellectual Property Law conference organized by the University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law and the University of Pennsylvania Law School, and BYU Law School. I would like to thank Dean Kevin Johnson and Associate Dean Vik Amar for providing generous institutional support for this project. I would also like to thank Erin Choi and the UC Davis School of Law library staff for exceptional research assistance. Finally, I would like to thank the excellent editors of the Washington University Law Review. 2 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW [VOL. 92:1 attributes, moreover, apply in large part to technological innovation as well, thus revealing how patent law relies upon and reinforces a rather distorted view of the innovative processes it seeks to promote. Moving from the descriptive to the prescriptive, this Article cautions against extending exclusive rights to social innovations and suggests several nonpatent mechanisms for accelerating this valuable activity. Finally, it examines the theoretical implications of social innovation for patent law, thus helping to contribute to a more holistic framework for innovation law and policy.
Keywords: Droit; Innovation; Valorisation

Écosystème | Centre d’entrepreneuriat UdeM - CEUM (CEUMONTRÉAL)
Montréal dispose d’un solide écosystème entrepreneurial, répondant à tous les besoins.

Entrepreneuriat : choisir la bonne forme juridique d’entreprise - Éducaloi (Éducaloi)
Avoir un projet d’affaires, c’est une chose. Transformer ce projet en véritable entreprise viable et pérenne, c’est autre chose. Pour s’assurer de mettre toutes les chances de son côté, il faut commencer par choisir la forme juridique d’entreprise la mieux adaptée à son projet. Les questions à se poser avant de se lancer L’entrepreneur qui […]

Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: Fundamentals, Concepts, and Tools - Portales, Luis (Springer International Publishing, 2019)
Chapitres variés - Chap. 1 : Définition / Théorie - Chap. 4 : Basics, Characteristics and Differences of Social Entrepreneurship - Entrepreneuriat 4.4 - Chap. 13 | Développement durable 2.3.1
Keywords: Impact social; Innovation sociale; Objectifs de développement durable; Responsabilité sociétale des entreprises; Social entrepreneur; Social entrepreneurship; Social intrapreneur; social business

ISSaQ 4.0: un questionnaire auto-administré sur le potentiel de mise à l'échelle des innovations en santé et en services sociaux - Unité de soutien SSA Québec; Corôa, Roberta D.C.; Ben Charif, Ali; Plourde, Karine V.; Gogovor, Amédé; Légaré, France (Unité soutien SSA Québec, 2023)
ISSaQ 4.0 permet aux équipes d’évaluer le potentiel de mise à l’échelle de leurs innovations. Il s’agit d’un questionnaire auto-administré.

Quelques ficelles du métier de chercheur collaboratif - Morrissette, Joëlle (2012)
L’approche collaborative en recherche est une méthodologie d’intervention qui s’inscrit dans le cadre plus général des recherches dites participatives. Sa visée est celle d’un rapprochement entre le milieu de la recherche et celui de la pratique professionnelle. Dans cette perspective, elle suppose d’offrir à des praticiens des activités réflexives susceptibles de leur servir d’occasion de développement professionnel dans le cadre d’une démarche formelle de production de savoirs scientifiques. Cette réflexion rétrospective sur ma démarche doctorale (CRSH 2005-2008) a pour but d’examiner la façon dont j’ai traduit cette double visée de l’approche collaborative auprès d’un groupe d’enseignantes du primaire. Plus précisément, j’examine les implications méthodologiques de ce type de recherche en illustrant comment elles se sont concrétisées dans le cadre de la démarche d’exploration sur le terrain. Pour ce faire, je rapporte des événements situés « en coulisses » desquels j’ai dégagé des savoirs d’expérience pour le chercheur collaboratif.

A systematic review of living lab literature - Hossain, Mokter; Leminen, Seppo; Westerlund, Mika (Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019)
A living lab is a physical or virtual space in which to solve societal challenges, especially for urban areas, by bringing together various stakeholders for collaboration and collective ideation. Although the notion has received increasing attention from scholars, practitioners and policy makers, its essence remains unclear to many. We therefore performed a systematic literature review of a sample of 114 scholarly articles about living labs to understand the central facets discussed in the nascent literature. In particular, we explored the origin of the living lab concept and its key paradigms and characteristics, including stakeholder roles, contexts, challenges, main outcomes, and sustainability. While doing this, we discovered that the number of publications about living labs has increased significantly since 2015, and several journals are very active in publishing articles on the topic. The living lab is considered a multidisciplinary phenomenon and it encompasses various research domains despite typically being discussed under open and user innovation paradigms. What is more, the existing literature views living labs simultaneously as landscapes, real-life environments, and methodologies, and it suggests that they include heterogeneous stakeholders and apply various business models, methods, tools and approaches. Finally, living labs face some challenges, such as temporality, governance, efficiency, user recruitment, sustainability, scalability and unpredictable outcomes. In contrast, the benefits include tangible and intangible innovation and a broader diversity of innovation. Based on our analysis, we provide some implications and suggestions for future research.
Keywords: Innovation ouverte; Living labs; Revue de littérature; Sustainability

How to apply RRI - RRI Tools

What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? - Razzouk, Rim; Shute, Valerie (2012)

Entrepreneuriat social ou économie sociale: Quelle différence? - Salathé-Beaulieu, Gabriel (MAIN VISIBLE - VISIBLE HAND, 2016)
Note : cet article a d’abord été rédigé en anglais à l’intention du blog de Carleton’s Perspective on Public Policy et vise à faire connaître les résultats de la synthèse de connaissances rédigée p…

Favoriser l’acceptabilité sociale de l’utilisation des données de santé en recherche Pourquoi et comment faire ? - Cécile Petitgand (2022)
Document PDF à ajouter

Pour la mise en commun des savoirs - Lexique - Praxis
Base de connaissances collective et ouverte qui facilite la mise en commun des savoirs pratiques, par Projet collectif.

Wiki des possibles - Montréal en commun; Défi des villes intelligentes; Solon
Voir la section "Parcourez les thématiques de la transition"

Glossaire - RQIS (Réseau québécois en innovation sociale)
Le Réseau québécois en innovation sociale est un espace de partage et de mobilisation des savoirs et des expériences qui contribue à faire de l’innovation sociale un levier indispensable au développement durable du Québec.

Vocabulaire de la co-construction - Foudriat, Michel; Leyrie, Christophe; Argoud, Dominique; Vaillancourt, Yves (ESF éditeur, 2021)
Section: 190 pages ; 24 cm.

Trajectoires d'innovation: Des émergences à la reconnaissance - Durand Folco, Jonathan (Presses de l'Université du Québec, 2019)
Dans un contexte de multiplication des expériences innovatrices, le présent ouvrage veut faire reconnaître les pratiques émergentes comme étant valables et justes, et montrer leur capacité à transformer le monde. Ainsi, les auteurs prônent le passage d’une vision minimaliste de l’innovation sociale, selon laquelle les acteurs sociaux et communautaires agissent de manière à pallier l’« austéritarisme » gouvernemental et les insuffisances provoquées par le marché, à une approche plus large, orientée vers une véritable transformation sociale, économique et territoriale. Cette approche rappelle que les objectifs du développement économique doivent être soumis aux impératifs sociétaux et environnementaux. Ainsi, lutter pour faire reconnaître le pouvoir de la société civile de réinventer le monde, c’est réagir au déni de l’alternative, si présent dans le discours des décideurs. C’est aussi donner à voir des initiatives peu valorisées par ces discours, parce qu’elles ne s’inscrivent pas dans leur logique économique, laquelle est essentiellement productiviste et destructrice. Penser la transition, c’est réimaginer des institutions et des pratiques capables d’accroître la capacité des collectivités à favoriser le bien commun. C’est affirmer qu’une société créative et innovatrice devrait adhérer à une vision large de l’innovation, orientée vers le développement économique, mais aussi vers la création d’un écosystème d’innovation où les progrès technologiques et sociaux se croisent et se complètent, écosystème qui devrait repenser les rapports inégalitaires entre les genres, les populations et les territoires.

Introduction - Innovation collective: Quand créer avec devient essentiel - Lehmann, Valérie; Colomb, Valérie (Presses de l'Université du Québec, 2020)
Cet ouvrage collectif a comme objectif de mettre en lumière le travail mené par les personnes et les organisations qui s’engagent à construire le futur en devenant des codéveloppeurs, acceptant par là même qu’elles ne possèdent qu’une partie des connaissances nécessaires aux projets qu’elles portent et bâtissent. Pour répondre à des besoins sociétaux de plus en plus complexes, de multiples institutions publiques et privées expérimentent ces nouveaux modes d’action inclusifs, qui consistent à travailler avec les parties prenantes des projets plutôt que de travailler pour celles-ci, afin d’ériger des biens communs et de s’assurer de leur usage. L’innovation collective : quand créer avec devient essentiel explore ces pratiques novatrices qui conjuguent audace, diversité et réalisme. Les projets dont il est question touchent à la ville, à la santé, au droit, au tourisme, au développement international, au commerce, à la technologie et à la recherche. Après avoir traité de l’innovation collective et de ses représentations, le livre aborde ses enjeux et ses échelles d’action, décortique certains dispositifs déployés pour créer avec et discute des rôles des acteurs engagés dans ces démarches. Ensuite, cinq expériences sont analysées par leurs participants, et les derniers textes portent sur les limites et les difficultés associées aux systèmes ouverts. Le présent ouvrage se veut une invitation à parcourir différentes facettes de ces innovations vivifiantes qui façonnent pas à pas l’avenir de la Terre. Bon voyage et bonne méditation. Valérie Lehmann, MBA, Ph. D., est professeur à l’École des sciences de la gestion de l’Université du Québec à Montréal depuis 2006. Elle est intervenante à l’ESSEC depuis 2003 et, depuis 2016, professeure vacataire à Sciences Po Lyon. Valérie Colomb est docteure en sciences de l’information et de la communication et architecte. Membre de l’Équipe de recherche de Lyon en sciences de l’information et de la communication et du Labex Intelligence des Mondes Urbains, elle est enseignante-chercheuse à Sciences Po Lyon.

Les Capteurs d’innovation sociale - Institut Jean-Baptiste Godin
Un guide avec des bonnes questions pour guider votre planification.

Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation - Edwards-Schachter, Mónica; L. Wallace, Matthew (2017)
This paper examines the evolution in the conceptualization of Social Innovation (SI) with a view to elucidating the multiplication of uses of the term over the last half century. We performed a comprehensive and systematic literature review extracting 252 definitions of SI through a search of 2,339 documents comprising academic papers, books and book chapters, together research and policy reports. To guide the inductive analysis of pluri-vocal discourses we assume innovation to be a learning-based process involving actors’ interactions and social practices. We apply mixed qualitative methodologies, combining content analysis based on an interpretivist ontology with cognitive mapping techniques. Our findings show that SI was introduced as an analytical concept by incipient academic communities and has spread in the last decades as a normative concept fuelled by development and innovation policies. SI is defined by a set of common core elements underpinning three different and interrelated discursive ‘areas’: processes of social change, sustainable development and the services sector. We point to some policy implications and a number of promising avenues for research towards the advancement of a broader socio-technical theory of innovation.

Du concept d’« innovation sociale » - Prades, Jacques (Revue internationale de l'économie sociale : recma, 2015)
Un article de la revue Revue internationale de l'économie sociale, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Publisher: Association Recma
Keywords: Coopératives; Définition; Europe; Histoire; Innovation technologique; Économie

Du concept d’« innovation sociale » - Prades, Jacques (Revue internationale de l'économie sociale : recma, 2015)
Un article de la revue Revue internationale de l'économie sociale, diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.
Publisher: Association Recma

Innovation sociale | Note Praxis - Praxis
9 définition(s) pour le terme Innovation sociale

Innovation sociale : de quoi parle-t-on ? - Avise
Keywords: Définition

‘Shaken, but not stirred’: Sixty years of defining social innovation - Edwards-Schachter, Mónica; Wallace, Matthew (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017)
This paper examines the evolution in the conceptualization of Social Innovation (SI) with a view to elucidating the multiplication of uses of the term over the last half century. We performed a comprehensive and systematic literature review extracting 252 definitions of SI through a search of 2,339 documents comprising academic papers, books and book chapters, together research and policy reports. To guide the inductive analysis of pluri-vocal discourses we assume innovation to be a learning-based process involving actors’ interactions and social practices. We apply mixed qualitative methodologies, combining content analysis based on an interpretivist ontology with cognitive mapping techniques. Our findings show that SI was introduced as an analytical concept by incipient academic communities and has spread in the last decades as a normative concept fuelled by development and innovation policies. SI is defined by a set of common core elements underpinning three different and interrelated discursive ‘areas’: processes of social change, sustainable development and the services sector. We point to some policy implications and a number of promising avenues for research towards the advancement of a broader socio-technical theory of innovation.
Keywords: Histoire

Apprendre ensemble : un cadre d’évaluation de l’engagement des patients et du public (EPP) en recherche - CEPPP

Apprendre ensemble : un cadre d’évaluation de l’engagement des patients et du public (EPP) en recherche – CEPPP

Projet outils d'évaluation en innovation sociale - RQIS (2022)

Projet outils d'évaluation en innovation sociale (Réseau québécois en innovation sociale)
Le Réseau québécois en innovation sociale est un espace de partage et de mobilisation des savoirs et des expériences qui contribue à faire de l’innovation sociale un levier indispensable au développement durable du Québec.

Towards Braiding (Gesturing Towards Decolonial Futures, 2019)
Towards Braiding is an on-going collaborative process between Elwood Jimmy and Vanessa Andreotti hosted and funded by the Musagetes Arts Foundation. This collaboration involves several modes of re…

Apprendre ensemble : un cadre d’évaluation de l’engagement des patients et du public (EPP) - L'Espérance, Audrey; Bogdanova, Eleonora; Canfield, Carolyn; Levasseur, Mary Anne; Del Grande, Claudio; Abelson, Julia; Dogba, Maman Joyce; Fancott, Carol; Loignon, Christine; Majnemer, Annette; Pomey, Marie-Pascale; Rasiah, Jananee; et al. (CEPPP)
Le Cadre d’évaluation de l’engagement des patients et du public (EPP) en recherche, Apprendre Ensemble, est un outil national adaptable, qui peut être utilisé pour planifier et pour évaluer le processus d’engagement...

Le transfert en vidéo | Territoires innovants en Économie sociale et solidaire liaison et transferts

Les formes de transfert de connaissances (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Mobilisation des connaissances - La recherche - Université de Montréal

Plan de Barwick - Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health
This form can help you think through different ways to mobilize knowledge and create a solid plan for moving ahead. If you are considering multiple target audiences, you may want to complete individual plans to guide specific activities for each of these knowledge user groups. Or check out Appendix A for an alternate way to sort through your various strategies to reach different audiences.

Leader humility and team innovation: The role of team reflexivity and team proactive personality - Leblanc, Pierre-Marc; Rousseau, Vincent; Harvey, Jean-François (Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2022)
Despite the recent surge of research on leader humility, it remains unclear how and when teams benefit from it. Drawing on social cognitive theory, we propose a moderated mediation model that we test using multisource, time-lagged data collected from 71 teams in a university-affiliated hospital. We find that humble leaders indirectly enhance team innovation via greater team reflexivity. Additionally, we consider the average level of proactive personality of team members as a boundary condition of the positive effect of leader humility. Our results show that leader humility prompts team reflexivity only when team mean level of proactive personality is high, which in turn increases team innovation. Bridging social cognitive theory with research on humble leadership in teams, our study offers important implications for both theory and practice.
_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/job.2648
Keywords: leader humility

Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations - Edmondson, Amy C.; Harvey, Jean-François (Human Resource Management Review, 2018)
Cross-boundary teaming, within and across organizations, is an increasingly popular strategy for innovation. Knowledge diversity is seen to expand the range of views and ideas that teams can draw upon to innovate. Yet, case studies reveal that teaming across knowledge boundaries can be difficult in practice, and innovation is not always realized. Two streams of research are particularly relevant for understanding the challenges inherent in cross-boundary teaming: research on team effectiveness and research on knowledge in organizations. They offer complementary insights: the former stream focuses on group dynamics and measures team inputs, processes, emergent states, and outcomes, while the latter closely investigates dialog and objects in recurrent social practices. Drawing from both streams, this paper seeks to shed light on the complexity of cross-boundary teaming, while highlighting factors that may enhance its effectiveness. We develop an integrative model to provide greater explanatory power than previous approaches to assess cross-boundary teaming efforts and their innovation performance.
Keywords: Innovation; Teams

“Opening Innovation” Across Layers of Practices: Developing an Integrative View of the Emergence of Digital Health - Dionne, Karl-Emanuel; Carlile, Paul (Managing Inter-organizational Collaborations: Process Views, 2019)
Innovation challenges are increasingly complex, cutting across distributed actors from different disciplines, organizations, and fields. Solving such challenges requires creating the capacities of opening up for innovation to access and develop a greater amount and variety of knowledge and resources. Perspectives on open source, open innovation, and interorganizational collaboration have explored such capacities, but from different origins and scopes of analysis. Our practice-based integrative framework of “opening innovation” helps highlight these differences and connect their relative strengths. Through a critical literature review paired with an analysis of different empirical cases from Hacking Health, a non-profit organization helping drive digital health innovation, the authors reveal the user-centric, firm-centric, and field-centric approaches to opening innovation that progressively connect a greater variety of actors and resources. The authors show how specific new relational practices they produce address the new relational dynamics these connections bring to accumulate more resources for innovation to keep progressing.
Keywords: Collaboration interorganisationnelle; Healthcare; Innovation ouverte; Open source

II. Regard sur le contrôle organisationnel de l’innovation sociale : réflexion contre-intuitive - Codello, Pénélope (GESS, 2018)
La gestion est-elle un mal ou un remède pour les entreprises sociales et solidaires ? Les entreprises sociales et solidaires sont-elles des modèles d’apprentissage pour la gestion ? Nous amènent-elles à penser la gestion autrement ? Cet ouvrage vise à dépasser les tabous liés à la gestion dans l’entreprise sociale et solidaire. Collectif de chercheurs en sciences humaines et sociales (académiques et/ou praticiens), notre ambition est de porter un regard critique sur la gestion des entreprises sociales et solidaires. Sur la base de l’étude de nombreux cas (mutuelles, associations, coopératives de consommateurs, banques coopératives, Scop, Scic, etc.), il s’agit de questionner et comprendre les dispositifs et les pratiques de gestion des entreprises sociales et solidaires. La réflexion des auteurs s’est construite autour des questionnements suivants : Que nous apprennent les entreprises sociales et solidaires sur la gestion des organisations ? Qu’ont-elles mis en œuvre de spécifique ? Existe-t-il déjà des « pépites » à observer, à essaimer issues de leurs pratiques de gestion ? Le phénomène d’isomorphisme avec les modèles d’entreprise capitaliste est-il si important ? Si oui, est-il un problème ? Pourquoi ? Et comment construire d’autres modes de gestion ? Quelles questions les organisations doivent-elles se poser pour dépasser les tensions inhérentes à l’hybridité entre économique, social ou solidaire ? Que doivent-elles inventer ? L’ouvrage se compose d’essais qui visent à défendre des points de vue sur des sujets récurrents et importants pour les entreprises sociales et solidaires. Ces derniers sont organisés en quatre thèmes : dépasser les tabous pour une gestion utile au projet social ou solidaire ; gestion pour et par la valeur sociale ; comment organiser durablement la gouvernance démocratique ; penser autrement la gestion des ressources humaines dans l’entreprise sociale et solidaire. Ces questions, nous l’espérons, feront sens et aideront tant dans la compréhension des phénomènes que dans la prise de décisions et la formation pour une gestion au service des entreprises sociales et solidaires.

Exploring the social innovation process in a large market based social enterprise: A dynamic capabilities approach | Emerald Insight (2018)

Éduquer à la citoyenneté démocratique par l’innovation sociale : l’idéal de l’entrepreneuriat social remis en question - Mailhot, Chantale; Gaudet, Stephanie; Drapeau, Émilie; Fuca, Jose (Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2021)
The concepts of entrepreneurship and citizenship intersect more and more in the educational projects of social entrepreneurship. In this article, we have analyzed an experiment conducted by a nonprofit organization whose mission is to increase citizen participation. We are interested in the discourses and tools that it has mobilized for training in social entrepreneurship. Our objective is to uncover the norms and values underlying the conception of citizenship transmitted through the training. We show that there are tensions between the aims of democratic citizenship promoted by the organization and the concept of the citizen that underlies training in social entrepreneurship. Our contribution is twofold: 1) We enrich the literature on education for democratic citizenship by analyzing a new approach, that of education in social entrepreneurship; 2) We take a critical look at the concept of social entrepreneurship when it is used in training for democratic citizenship by analyzing this practice and framing it within the field of social innovation
Number: 2
Keywords: Entrepreneuriat social; Innovation sociale

Fostering the post-development debate: the Latin American concept of tecnologia social - Pozzebon, Marlei; Fontenelle, Isleide Arruda (Third World Quarterly, 2018)
This essay revisits the historical development of a concept – tecnologia social – as one avenue for discussing alternatives to post-development, arguing that the Western-based historical path of technology development is one of the main sources of growing human impoverishment, social inequalities and economic dependency. The concept of tecnologia social points towards political processes that create opportunities to redefine the arrangements among social groups, artefacts and methods used in everyday life, particularly for production and consumption. Because the post-development debate has been criticised for formulating a sound and strong critique to mainstream development but failing to propose concrete empirical alternatives, we seek to foster the debate through the Latin American concept of tecnologia social.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1432351
Keywords: Amérique latine; Appropriation technologique; Social technology; Technologie sociale

Nourishing the Social Innovation Debate with the “Social Technology” South American Research Tradition - Pozzebon, Marlei; Tello-Rozas, Sonia; Heck, Isabel (VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2021)
Inspired by the South American research tradition known as “social technology,” this article proposes an operational framework to advance the understanding of mechanisms that help to promote social transformation. To illustrate its theorizing potential, we apply the framework to a nonprofit organization–Parole d’excluEs–that was created in Montreal (Canada) in 2006 and that has been promoting citizen mobilization and commitment to social change (parole-dexclues.ca). To that end, we offer a theoretical paper with an empirical illustration as a first step in a reflection on employing a global South theoretical lens–drawing on the concept of social technology–to make sense of a global North social innovation experience and to advance existing knowledge on the mechanisms of social transformation. The results contribute to social innovation research and practice, particularly at the interface between the management and nonprofit literatures.

‘Tecnologia social’ and social change: the case of Agência de Redes in Rio de Janeiro - Saldanha, Fabio Prado; Aguilar-Delgado, Natalia; Pozzebon, Marlei (Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração, 2019)
The case provides an opportunity to understand how tecnologia social – a South American concept that might be seen as an equivalent to social innovation – can help promote social change. To illustrate the potential of social technologies, the case of Agência de Redes is presented. The case is intended for use at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Its purpose is to promote the discussion of the South American concept of tecnologia social, as well as to analyse of one particular tecnologia social using a conceptual model to understand the mechanisms that might promote social change.

SOCIAL INNOVATION IN THE CULTURAL SECTOR: THE CASE OF PJE/PRODIGIUM - Saldanha, Fabio Prado; Delgado, Natalia Aguilar; Pozzebon, Marlei (Revista Brasileira de Casos de Ensino em Administração, 2021)
This case examines the major challenges faced by Productions Jeun’Est (PJE) and Prodigium, a social enterprise working in the cultural sector. The profits generated by Prodigium’s activities in the entertainment field are invested in the PJE training program that aims to increase the social inclusion of vulnerable youth by training them to be technicians in the cultural market. By studying this case, students are expected to understand the elements of a social business model, to analyze the role of the different elements forming a social innovation and to evaluate the challenges of planning its transfer to another context.

Everyone a Changemaker? Exploring the Moral Underpinnings of Social Innovation Discourse Through Real Utopias - Teasdale, Simon; Roy, Michael J.; Ziegler, Rafael; Mauksch, Stefanie; Dey, Pascal; Raufflet, Emmanuel B. (Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2021)
The term ‘social innovation’ has come to gather all manner of meanings from policymakers and politicians across the political spectrum. But while actors may unproblematically unite around a broad perspective of social innovation as bringing about (positive) social change, we rarely see evidence of a shared vision for the kind of social change that social innovation ought to bring about. Taking inspiration from methods that recognise the utopian thinking inherent in the social innovation concept, we draw upon Erik Olin Wright’s concept of ‘real utopias’ to investigate the moral underpinnings inherent in the public statements of Ashoka, one of the most prominent social innovation actors operating in the world today. We seek to animate discussion on the moral principles that guide social innovation discourse through examining the problems that Ashoka is trying to solve through social innovation, the world they are striving to create, and the strategies they propose to realise their vision.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1738532
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Utopie

Citizen Innovation as Niche Restoration – A Type of Social Innovation and Its Relevance for Political Participation and Sustainability - Ziegler, Rafael (Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2017)
There have been many creative responses to modern economic, political and technological developments and their (un)intended social and ecological consequences. These responses provide the soil for the type of social innovation identified in this article: citizen innovation as niche restoration. It is about civic action that creates novelty by seeking to restore the places and practices citizens already value. Drawing from an in-depth case study on decentralized water management, the concept of citizen innovation as niche restoration is explored, and its implications for political participation and sustainability discussed.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2017.1364286
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Participation

Social innovation as a collaborative concept - Ziegler, Rafael (Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2017)
The rise of social innovation expresses a discontent with innovation as we know it, and its ability to deliver just and sustainable outcomes. Yet, social innovation is also notoriously vague as a concept, thereby putting into doubt whether the concept offers any real improvements or alternatives. This paper issues an invitation to think about social innovation as a collaborative concept. The conceptual framework shows collaboration, rather than contestation, to offer a space for the working together of different perspectives and actors. The collaborative concept frame welcomes and seeks to explain a diversity of uses. Singling out key features of social innovation as a collaborative concept, it seeks to contribute to an emerging practice that makes different contributions part of a progressive conversation about social innovation, the evaluative ideas associated with it and the evidence from policies and projects. Identifying transformative, taxonomical and transitional–sceptical uses of social innovation, the paper highlights the importance of analysing the evaluative aspects of the multisectoral reconfigurations associated with social innovation so as to keep track of its role for justice and sustainability.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2017.1348935
Keywords: Collaboration; Innovation sociale; Éthique

Everyone a Changemaker? Exploring the Moral Underpinnings of Social Innovation Discourse Through Real Utopias - Teasdale, Simon; Roy, Michael J.; Ziegler, Rafael; Mauksch, Stefanie; Dey, Pascal; Raufflet, Emmanuel B. (Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2021)
The term ‘social innovation’ has come to gather all manner of meanings from policymakers and politicians across the political spectrum. But while actors may unproblematically unite around a broad perspective of social innovation as bringing about (positive) social change, we rarely see evidence of a shared vision for the kind of social change that social innovation ought to bring about. Taking inspiration from methods that recognise the utopian thinking inherent in the social innovation concept, we draw upon Erik Olin Wright’s concept of ‘real utopias’ to investigate the moral underpinnings inherent in the public statements of Ashoka, one of the most prominent social innovation actors operating in the world today. We seek to animate discussion on the moral principles that guide social innovation discourse through examining the problems that Ashoka is trying to solve through social innovation, the world they are striving to create, and the strategies they propose to realise their vision.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1738532
Keywords: Changement; Innovation sociale; Utopie

Social innovation for biodiversity: A literature review and research challenges - Ziegler, Rafael; Balzac-Arroyo, Josephine; Hölsgens, Rick; Holzgreve, Sarah; Lyon, Fergus; Spangenberg, Joachim H.; Thapa, Philipp P. (Ecological Economics, 2022)
There are calls for social innovation to help with the effort to halt biodiversity loss. However, research on social innovation and biodiversity is dispersed and covers a multitude of disciplines. A systematic overview of research on social innovation and biodiversity is missing and this paper contributes by focusing on social innovation to tackle the drivers of biodiversity loss and unsustainability. The paper reviews research on social innovation in changing land use (agriculture, forestry, aquatic ecosystems and cities), in tackling exploitation of organisms (fishing, hunting, harvesting), and in addressing threats of climate change, pollution and invasive species. Across these drivers, we find a) a strong emphasis on social innovation as civic action for changing practices in addressing unsustainability, b) that social innovation research tends to focus on local experimentation although there are bodies of literature on policy-driven innovations and consumer/producer-driven innovations, and c) that there is very little research taking a critical perspective to explore negative or unintended consequences of social innovation. Drawing on the review, we propose three cross cutting issues that can be a focus for future research, practice and supportive policy: social innovation for nature-based solutions, social innovation for participatory governance, and social innovation for technology that tackles biodiversity loss.
Keywords: Biodiversité; Durabilité; Innovation sociale

CERESO | Expertise plurielle, solutions novatrices

10 Dangers to Collective Impact (SSIR)
A look at the worst practices in using the collective impact approach for social change and lessons on how to avoid them.

Mobilisation des connaissances - Université de Montréal (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

Knowledge Mobilization Toolkit - Ontario Centre of Excellence for Child and Youth Mental Health
Les méthodes de mobilisation de connaissances impliquant activement et dès les premières étapes les parties prenantes peuvent être des modèles qui peuvent se transposer à la gestion de projets d'innovation sociale.

Transfert de connaissances 2 – La note de politique - Équipe RENARD (catalogue.edulib.org)

Transfert de connaissances 3 – Le courtage de connaissances - Équipe RENARD (catalogue.edulib.org)
Ce cours fait partie d’une série intitulée Le transfert de connaissances : Favoriser des pratiques et des politiques fondées sur la recherche. Nous vous encourageons à suivre d'abord le premier cours d'introduction au transfert de connaissances!

Transfert de connaissances 1 – Introduction (catalogue.edulib.org)

Transfert de connaissances 1 – Introduction - Équipe RENARD (catalogue.edulib.org)
Bienvenue dans cette série de MOOCs intitulée Le transfert de connaissances : Favoriser des pratiques et des politiques fondées sur la recherche.

Knowledge Translation 1 - Introduction (catalogue.edulib.org)

Co Renforcement des capacités (CorDesCaps)

Frugal Innovation and the New Product Development Process: Insights from Indonesia - Cadeddu, Stephanie; Donovan, Jerome; Topple, Cheree; De Waal, Gerrit (2019)

Théorie U - Changement émergent et innovation: Modèles, applications et critique (Les Presses de l'Université du Québec, 2012)
https://www.acfas.ca/publications/magazine/2013/03/theorie-u-changement-emergent-innovation

MOSAIC HEC (Mosaic Pôle créativité et innovation)
NOUVELLES Évènements

La co-construction - Foudriat, Michel (Presses de l'EHESP, 2020)

Communagir pour emporter - Pour une rencontre en ligne réussie - Communagir
Une organisation à but non lucratif vouée au développement des collectivités et des régions du Québec

PIVOT: occasions de financement (La recherche - Université de Montréal)

What it Research and Responsible Innovation?- RRI Tools - RRI Tools

Plaidoyer pour l'innovation responsable en santé - In Fieri (2022)

Responsible Innovation in Business - Jarmai, Katharina; Tharani, Adele; Nwafor, Caroline (Responsible Innovation : Business Opportunities and Strategies for Implementation, 2020)
This chapter introduces responsible innovation in a business context. The first part explains the basic terms that constitute responsible innovation from a business perspective. The second part presents tangible business practices that operationalise responsible innovation and introduces two good practice examples that hint at the variety of ways in which responsible innovation can be implemented in companies.
Keywords: Innovation responsable; Responsible research and innovation

Limits to responsible innovation - de Hoop, Evelien; Pols, Auke; Romijn, Henny (Journal of Responsible Innovation, 2016)
Responsible Innovation (RI) is a young field of research that has nevertheless had remarkable successes in dissemination within academic and political circles. However, there is relatively little awareness of its limits, blind spots and situations in which it cannot be used for actual innovation trajectories. Without such awareness, there is a risk that RI may get hollowed out and turned into a tool for ‘greenwashing’. To examine RI’s limits, we present a case study on biofuel innovation in Hassan, South India. This case study demonstrates that there are important barriers that may make it difficult to conduct innovation according to RI values. In particular, we highlight the following factors that emerge from our case study and need more attention in order to be included and adequately theorised in the RI literature: material barriers to innovation, engagement with abandoning or reducing existing practices as a consequence of innovation, power differences and dependencies, (un)clear demarcation of responsibilities, strategic behaviour and, lastly, different, diverging and even contradictory interests. We demonstrate that such factors may obstruct the possibility to innovate in a responsible way, leading us to our core observation that RI should be about innovating responsibly – or not innovating at all.
Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
Keywords: Innovation responsable

A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation - Schomberg, Rene (Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 2013)
I provide a vision and definition of Responsible Research and Innovation and propose a broad framework for its implementation under Research and Innovation schemes around the world. I make the case that RRI should be understood as a strategy of stakeholders to become mutual responsive to each other and anticipate research and innovation outcomes underpinning the "grand challenges" of our time for which they share > responsibility.> Research and Innovation processes need to become more responsive and adaptive to these grand challenges. This implies, among other, the introduction of broader foresight and impact assessments for new technologies beyond their anticipated market-benefits and risks. Social benefits of new technologies need to take into account widely shared public values. This implies a paradigm shift in innovation policy, moving away from an emphasis on key technologies towards issue and mission oriented policies. Background information can be found on: http://Renevonschomberg.wordpress.com
Journal Abbreviation: Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society

Developing a framework for responsible innovation - Stilgoe, Jack; Owen, Richard; Macnaghten, Phil (Research Policy, 2013)
The governance of emerging science and innovation is a major challenge for contemporary democracies. In this paper we present a framework for understanding and supporting efforts aimed at ‘responsible innovation’. The framework was developed in part through work with one of the first major research projects in the controversial area of geoengineering, funded by the UK Research Councils. We describe this case study, and how this became a location to articulate and explore four integrated dimensions of responsible innovation: anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion and responsiveness. Although the framework for responsible innovation was designed for use by the UK Research Councils and the scientific communities they support, we argue that it has more general application and relevance.
Keywords: Gouvernance; Innovation responsable; Nouvelles technologies; Éthique

Communagir pour emporter - Les outils d'animation - Communagir
Une organisation à but non lucratif vouée au développement des collectivités et des régions du Québec

Comprendre et agir - Lire sa collectivité - Communagir
Une organisation à but non lucratif vouée au développement des collectivités et des régions du Québec

Cultivating Urban Storytellers: A Radical Co-Creation to Enact Cognitive Justice for/in Self-Built Neighbourhoods - Ortiz, Catalina (Urban Planning, 2022)
Catalina Ortiz

La démarche de développement durable : un processus intégrateur des enjeux sociaux et environnementaux dans les organisations - Riffon, Olivier (Revue Organisations & territoires, 2017)
Résumé Le développement durable est un concept faisant l’objet d’une large adhésion, autant auprès des organisations économiques, sociocommunautaires, environnementales que politiques. Sa définition, proposée en 1987 dans le rapport Brundtland, fait généralement consensus, mais l’interprétation de sa définition tend à varier selon les contextes d’application. De même, les outils utilisés pour sa mise en oeuvre varient selon le contexte et les besoins. Au Québec et ailleurs dans le monde, des organisations de toute taille ont entamé des démarches de développement durable. Divers outils, instruments et processus de mise en oeuvre sont utilisés pour guider la démarche de ces organisations. Le présent article propose une typologie de ces instruments. Nous présentons également les avantages et limites d’une démarche intégrée de développement durable.
Number: 1-2
Keywords: Développement durable

La transition | Chemins de transition - Chemins de Transition (2020)

What Sustainable Development Goals Do Social Innovations Address? A Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Social Innovation Literature - Eichler, Georg M.; Schwarz, Erich J. (Sustainability, 2019)
Interest in social innovations (SIs) from both the academic and the policy side is growing. Nonetheless, we still know little about which sustainable development goals (SDGs) SIs already address. Furthermore, only little is known about who the innovators developing and implementing SIs are. In this paper, we aim to bring more clarity and structure to the field of SIs. Firstly, a systematic literature review was conducted, before a content analysis was used to analyze the definitions used with regard to similarities. Secondly, all case studies described in the reviewed articles were then further systematically analyzed in order to identify the social or environmental problems addressed and the innovators involved. For the purpose of classifying the diverse types of problems, we used the globally known and broadly accepted 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs). Results showed that most SI case studies deal with an improvement of health and well-being. Furthermore, our study illustrates that there is a pronounced difference in the focus of SIs between developing and developed countries. Concerning the innovators, our results indicate that five types of innovators are fundamentally involved in developing and implementing SIs: social entrepreneurs, NGOs and non-profits, public institutions, civil society, firms, and social enterprises. Our definition analysis as well as the identification and classification of the innovators and addressed social needs bring much-needed clarity and structure to the field. However, our systematic review shows that SI is still in its infancy and it will be interesting to see where the field will head.
Number: 2 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Objectifs de développement durable; Social entrepreneurship; systematic review

Sustainability-oriented Innovation: A Systematic Review - Adams, Richard; Jeanrenaud, Sally; Bessant, John; Denyer, David; Overy, Patrick (International Journal of Management Reviews, 2016)
This paper is intended as a contribution to the ongoing conceptual development of sustainability-oriented innovation (SOI) and provides initial guidance on becoming and being sustainable. The authors organize and integrate the diverse body of empirical literature relating to SOI and, in doing so, develop a synthesized conceptual framework onto which SOI practices and processes can be mapped. Sustainability-oriented innovation involves making intentional changes to an organization's philosophy and values, as well as to its products, processes or practices to serve the specific purpose of creating and realizing social and environmental value in addition to economic returns. A critical reading of previous literature relating to environmental management and sustainability reveals how little attention has been paid to SOI, and what exists is only partial. In a review of 100 scholarly articles and 27 grey sources drawn from the period of the three Earth Summits (1992, 2002 and 2012), the authors address four specific deficiencies that have given rise to these limitations: the meaning of SOI; how it has been conceptualized; its treatment as a dichotomous phenomenon; and a general failure to reflect more contemporary practices. The authors adopt a framework synthesis approach involving first constructing an initial architecture of the landscape grounded in previous studies, which is subsequently iteratively tested, shaped, refined and reinforced into a model of SOI with data drawn from included studies: so advancing theoretical development in the field of SOI.
_eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/ijmr.12068

Livre blanc sur l'innovation durable - CIRODD (2021)
En ce premier quart de siècle, la population mondiale se trouve confrontée à d’importants défis économiques, sociaux et environnementaux. À l’ère de la mondialisation et d’une société industrielle fondée sur la croissance, les activités anthropiques outrepassent les seuils de durabilité supportés par la biosphère (Rockström et al., 2009; Scheffer, Carpenter, Foley, Folke et Walker, 2001; Steffen et al., 2015). Le portrait socio-économique est tout aussi préoccupant alors que la richesse et l’utilisation des ressources présentent des disparités croissantes à travers le monde (Alvaredo, Chancel, Piketty, Saez et Zucman, 2018; IRP, 2019; ONU, 2020).

Objectifs de développement durable - Nations Unies

Document d’accompagnement pour l’écoresponsabilité en recherche - Penser et rédiger en lien avec les Objectifs de développement durable de l’ONU - Université de Montréal (2022)
En 2022, la recherche de l’UdeM s’est dotée comme vision de « soutenir les équipes de l’UdeM afin que la passion pour la recherche, la création et l’innovation responsables permette de comprendre, d’imaginer et de construire ensemble un monde durablement meilleur ». Pour la mettre en œuvre, l’UdeM souhaite initier une démarche d’écoresponsabilité dans toutes les facettes de la recherche

The Unexplored Contribution of Responsible Innovation in Health to Sustainable Development Goals - Lehoux, Pascale; Pacifico Silva, Hudson; Pozelli Sabio, Renata; Roncarolo, Federico (Sustainability, 2018)
Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) represents an emerging Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) approach that could support not only the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) “Good health and well-being” but also other SDGs. Since few studies have conceptualized the relationships between RIH and the SDGs, our goal was to inductively develop a framework to identify knowledge gaps and areas for further reflections. Our exploratory study involved: (1) performing a web-based horizon scanning to identify health innovations with responsibility features; and (2) illustrating through empirical examples how RIH addresses the SDGs. A total of 105 innovations were identified: up to 43% were developed by non-profit organizations, universities or volunteers; 46.7% originated from the United States; and 64.5% targeted countries in Africa, Central and South America and South Asia. These innovations addressed health problems such as newborn care (15.5%), reduced mobility and limb amputation (14.5%), infectious diseases (10.9%), pregnancy and delivery care (9.1%) and proper access to care and drugs (7.3%). Several of these innovations were aligned with SDG10-Reduced inequalities (87%), SDG17-Partnerships for the goals (54%), SDG1-No poverty (15%) and SDG4-Quality education (11%). A smaller number of them addressed sustainable economic development goals such as SDG11-Sustainable cities and communities (9%) and SDG9-Industry and innovation (6%), and environmental sustainability goals such as SDG7-Affordable and clean energy (7%) and SDG6-Clean water and sanitation (5%). Three examples show how RIH combines entrepreneurship and innovation in novel ways to address the determinants of health, thereby contributing to SDG5 (Gender), SDG10 (Inequalities), SDG4 (Education) and SDG8 (Decent work), and indirectly supporting SDG7 (Clean energy) and SDG13 (Climate action). Further research should examine how alternative business models, social enterprises and social finance may support the STI approach behind RIH.
Number: 11 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Keywords: Objectifs de développement durable; Responsible research and innovation; Sustainability

Outil diagnostic de l'action en partenariat - Bilodeau, Angèle; Potvin, Louise; Galarneau, Marilène; Sénécal, Gilles; Fournier, Michel; Bernier, Jocelyne (2014)
Cet outil porte sur différents aspects de votre partenariat. Il vous permet d’exprimer vos perceptions et opinions quant à votre expérience au sein de votre partenariat. Il a été conçu à des fins d’autoévaluation, soit pour être utilisé par les membres d’un partenariat s’investissant volontairement dans la démarche. Il n’a pas été élaboré dans une optique de reddition de comptes ou à des fins de gestion par résultats.

Guidelines for Effective Regulatory Consultations - Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor du Canada (2007)
These guidelines are issued to advise managers and functional specialists on interpretation of the requirements of the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation regarding regulatory consultation and to provide tools to support effective consultations throughout the regulatory life cycle.

Consultation des parties prenantes Document de référence - INESSS; Fournier, Monique; Martin, Valérie; Dagenais, Pierre (2014)
Ce document de référence a été réalisé à partir d’une revue narrative systématisée des principes, méthodes et guides publiés par des agences d’évaluation des technologies et des modes d’intervention en santé et autres organismes -conseils semblables à l’INESSS, ainsi que d’articles scientifiques portant sur les méthodes de consultation et sur l’analyse de la participation des parties prenantes, des patients et du public.

Deliberative Methods for Understanding Environmental Systems - Stern, Paul C. (BioScience, 2005)
Environmental problem solving needs science but also inevitably requires subjective judgment. Science can help in dealing with subjectivity, because scientists have long experience developing institutions and practices to address the subjective and value-laden choices that are essential to scientific progress. Democracy has also developed approaches to the problem. The underlying principles can be applied to environmental policymaking. This article explores these issues in the context of decisions about environmental risks, drawing on the work of the National Research Council and other sources. It suggests some guidelines for risk deliberation—including broad-based participation, commitment to scientific quality, explicit attention to values, transparency of deliberative processes, and rules for closure and reconsideration—and recommends that an experimental approach be employed to learn how best to use deliberative methods.

Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making - OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2001)
This book examines a wide range of country experiences, offers examples of good practice, highlights innovative approaches and identifies promising tools (including new information technologies)for engaging citizens in policy making. It proposes a...

Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes - Abelson, Julia; Forest, Pierre-Gerlier; Eyles, John; Smith, Patricia; Martin, Elisabeth; Gauvin, Francois-Pierre (Social Science & Medicine, 2003)
A common thread weaving through the current public participation debate is the need for new approaches that emphasize two-way interaction between decision makers and the public as well as deliberation among participants. Increasingly complex decision making processes require a more informed citizenry that has weighed the evidence on the issue, discussed and debated potential decision options and arrived at a mutually agreed upon decision or at least one by which all parties can abide. We explore the recent fascination with deliberative methods for public involvement first by examining their origins within democratic theory, and then by focusing on the experiences with deliberative methods within the health sector. In doing so, we answer the following questions “What are deliberative methods and why have they become so popular? What are their potential contributions to the health sector?” We use this critical review of the literature as the basis for developing general principles that can be used to guide the design and evaluation of public involvement processes for the health-care sector in particular.
Keywords: Participation publique; Santé

Participatory Research Methods: A Methodological Approach in Motion - Bergold, Jarg; Thomas, Stefan (Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2012)
This article serves as an introduction to the FQS special issue "Participatory Qualitative Research." In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in participatory research strategies. The articles in this special issue come from different disciplines. Against the background of concrete empirical research projects, they address numerous conceptual considerations and methodological approaches. After reading the contributions, and engaging with the authors' arguments, we were prompted to focus in particular on those areas in which further work needs to be done. They include, on the one hand, fundamental principles of participatory research, such as democratic-theory considerations, the concept of "safe space," participation issues, and ethical questions. And, on the other hand, we focus on practical research considerations regarding the role and tasks of the various participants; specific methodological approaches; and quality criteria—understood here in the sense of arguments justifying a participatory approach. Our aim is to stimulate a broad discussion that does not focus only on participatory research in the narrower sense. Because participatory methodology poses certain knowledge- and research-related questions in a radical way, it has the potential to draw attention to hitherto neglected areas in qualitative methodology and to stimulate their further development.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201302
Number: 1
Keywords: Focus group; Normes éthiques; Participation; Participatory research methods; marginalization

Centre de recherche et de cocréation pour l’innovation et l’avancement durable des affaires autochtones (FSA ULaval)
Notre centre est dédié à la collaboration dans le respect du savoir traditionnel autochtone et son intégration aux approches occidentales.

A Spotlight of Co-creation and Inclusiveness of Public Open Spaces - Šuklje Erjavec, Ina; Ruchinskaya, Tatiana (CyberParks – The Interface Between People, Places and Technology: New Approaches and Perspectives, 2019)
This chapter focuses on co-creation as the way to engage different stakeholders with everyday urban environments based on equality, diversity and social cohesion. It presents the relationship of co-creation and inclusiveness of public open spaces together with different aspects of co-creation related to issues of publicness and space. It discusses why and how co-creation must take into consideration the characteristics of the comprehensive spatial development processes. It suggests that co-creation is a wider concept than co-design and is a multistage process that contributes to inclusive public spaces, providing measures for social sustainability of place. This chapter argues that digital tools may help to overcome challenges of co-creation and provide an opinion on the contribution of digital technologies to the co-creation process by engaging people in the design, use and management of public spaces, providing new resources for interaction and users’ empowerment. For that it presents an overview of the possible contribution of digital technologies to support inclusiveness of the co-creation processes that is structured by typologies of digital tools and their possible interlinking with the steps of the co-creation process. To improve the understanding of such possibilities it critically addresses strengths and weaknesses of using digital tools for co-creation and inclusiveness and provides recommendations for their further development.
Utilité des outils numériques pour la cocréation.
Keywords: Co-création; Inclusion; Outil numérique

Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How - Schillo, R. Sandra; Robinson, Ryan (Technology Innovation Management Review, 2017)
Place: Ottawa Publisher: Talent First Network

New models of inclusive innovation for development - Heeks, Richard; Foster, Christopher; Nugroho, Yanuar (Innovation and Development, 2014)
This special issue of Innovation and Development focuses on inclusive innovation; specifically on analysis of the new models of this form of innovation which are emerging. After discussing the growing need for research into those models, this editorial paper interrogates the meaning of ‘inclusive innovation’ and what it means to understand inclusive innovation in terms of models. The editorial then outlines the contribution of the papers that make up this special issue before drawing out some lessons for inclusive innovation policy and practice, and discussing future research priorities.

La co-construction, chapitre 7-8 - Foudriat, Michel (Presses de l'EHESP, 2020)
Chapitre 7 & 8 Extraits de l'ouvrage : https://www.cairn.info/la-co-construction–9782810908257-page-163.htm
Keywords: Co-construction; Réservé UdeM

UNaLAB Toolkit - Tools for Co-creation

Pîkiskwêtân Companion Resource Guides - Concordia Library

Co-creation for Responsible Research and Innovation: Experimenting with Design Methods and Tools - Deserti, Alessandro; Real, Marion; Schmittinger, Felicitas (Springer Nature, 2022)
This open access book summarizes research being pursued within the SISCODE (Society in Innovation and Science through CO-DEsign) project, funded by the EU under the H2020 programme, the goal of which is to set up an analytical, reflective and learning framework to explore the transformations in initiatives and policies emerging from the interaction between citizens and stakeholders. The book provides a critical analysis of the co-design processes activated in 10 co-creation labs addressing societal challenges across Europe. Each lab as a case study of real-life experimentation is described through its journey, starting from the purpose on the ground of the experimentation and the challenge addressed. Specific attention is then drawn on the role of policies and policy maker engagement. Finally, the experimentation is enquired in terms of its output, transformations triggered within the organization and the overall ecosystem, and its outcomes, opening the reasoning towards the lessons learnt and reflections that the entire co-creation journey brought.
Keywords: Co-création; Innovation; Libre accès; Outils; Recherche; Étude de cas

Social Innovation (nesta, 2021)
Social Innovation Social innovation is about developing new ideas to tackle social problems or meet social needs. It may be a new product, service, initiative, organisational model or approach to the delivery of public services.
**Carte d'information** **Type d’organisme** : Organisme de bienfaisance **Échelle géographique : Royaume-Uni** **Type de contenu et outils proposés** - Incubation et croissance de nouvelles organisations - Partenaires dans le monde entier - Aide des talents à l'innovation - Nouvelles/Actualités **Public visé:** Grand public **Nesta est un organisme en soutien à l'innovation sociale soutenu par la Young Foundation.**
Keywords: OBNL; Philanthropie; UK

Social Innovation - OCDE - OCDE (2021)
Social innovation refers to the design and implementation of new solutions that imply conceptual, process, product, or organisational change, which ultimately aim to improve the welfare and wellbeing of individuals and communities.
Keywords: International

Social tech (Wikipédia, 2021)
La social tech (abréviation de social technology, ou technologie sociale) représente l’ensemble des procédés, outils et technologies qui permettent d’améliorer la société et son environnement social.
Page Version ID: 179928677

Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda - Haefner, Naomi; Wincent, Joakim; Parida, Vinit; Gassmann, Oliver (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021)
Artificial Intelligence (AI) reshapes companies and how innovation management is organized. Consistent with rapid technological development and the replacement of human organization, AI may indeed compel management to rethink a company's entire innovation process. In response, we review and explore the implications for future innovation management. Using ideas from the Carnegie School and the behavioral theory of the firm, we review the implications for innovation management of AI technologies and machine learning-based AI systems. We outline a framework showing the extent to which AI can replace humans and explain what is important to consider in making the transformation to the digital organization of innovation. We conclude our study by exploring directions for future research.
Keywords: Gestion axée sur les résultats; Innovation; Intelligence artificielle; Réservé UdeM; Transformations; numérique

Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities - Cortés-Cediel, María E.; Iván, Cantador; Rodríguez, Bolívar Manuel Pedro (Social Science Computer Review, 2021)
With the advent of smart cities (SCs), governance has been placed at the core of the debate on how to create public value and achieve a high quality of life in urban environments. In particular, given that public value is rooted in democratic theory and new technologies that promote networking spaces have emerged, citizen participation represents one of the principal instruments to make government open and close to the citizenry needs. Participation in urban governance has undergone a great development: from the first postmodernist ideals of countering expert dominance to today’s focus on learning and social innovation, where citizen participation is conceptualized as co-creation and co-production. Despite this development, there is a lack of research to know how this new governance context is taking place in the SC arena. Addressing this situation, in this article, we present an exhaustive survey of the research literature and a deep study of the experience in participative initiatives followed by SCs in Europe. Through an analysis of 149 SC initiatives from 76 European cities, we provide interesting insights about how participatory models have been introduced in the different areas and dimensions of the cities, how citizen engagement is promoted in SC initiatives, and whether the so-called creative SCs are those with a higher number of projects governed in a participatory way.
Number: 4 Num Pages: 592-626 Place: Thousand Oaks, United States Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Keywords: Co-création; Co-production; Europe; Modèle participatif; Nouvelles technologies; Projets participatifs; Réservé UdeM; Urbanisme; Villes intelligentes

Maturité numérique : entreprendre une démarche - Fondation J. Armand Bombardier (2021)
Résumé d'une 3e conférence de la Série sur les données de Philagora. Les invités sont : - David Chartrand de Novatic - Viet Cao, Synapse C

Co-creating social innovation in quadruple helixes: evidence from Sweden - Öberg, Åsa; Albats, Ekaterina; Stefan, Ioana; Johansson, Peter E. (Proceedings of ISPIM Conferences, 2021)
In an increasingly globalized world, the challenges of society need to be tackled not by single organisations but by a multitude of stakeholders. Universities can contribute by extending their role and by collaborating with external stakeholders. This study employs qualitative methods to explore how a university engages with its innovation ecosystem through two different projects.The findings, connected to the development of educational and digital systems,show: 1) evidence of two extreme approaches to external stakeholder engagement and 2) three levels of tensions (multi-layered tensions) - on an overarching level, between stakeholder groups, and within groups of stakeholders. The contribution connects to literature on open innovation, quadruple helixes and lastly to university social innovation, especially responsibility diffusion.
N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Co-création; Europe; Quadruple helix approach

Mesure C - Outil d'auto-diagnostic des organismes en art et en culture - Synapse C (2021)
Pourquoi utiliser cet outil d’autodiagnostic ? Afin de vous aider à comprendre la manière de tirer le meilleur parti de vos données, Synapse C met à votre disposition un outil d’autodiagnostic en matière de données existantes et de leur utilisation dans le secteur des arts et de la culture. L’outil d’autodiagnostic permet à votre organisme d’évaluer sa capacité à utiliser les données et les outils numériques avec confiance et efficacité.

L'innovation sociale au cœur de l'économie sociale - TIESS OLT (2021)
Qu'est-ce que l'innovation sociale? Comment l'économie sociale est-elle un vecteur d'innovation sociale? Sur le terrain, localement, comment met-on en application l'innovation sociale par l'économie sociale? Visionnez le webinaire pour le découvrir! 00:00 Introduction 02:00 Annie Camus 20:39 Martin Frappier 34:58 Marykim D'Amours Bryson 49:20 Questions et conclusion
Directors: _:n2189
Keywords: Centre de recherche universitaire; Québec

Between Good Intentions and Enthusiastic Professors: The Missing Middle of University Social Innovation Structures in the Quadruple Helix - Benneworth, Paul; Cunha, Jorge; Cinar, Ridvan (Regional Helix Ecosystems and Sustainable Growth: The Interaction of Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, 2020)
This chapter considers the role of universities in stimulating social innovation, and in particular the issue that despite possessing substantive knowledge that might be useful for stimulating social innovation, universities to date have not been widely engaged in social innovation activities in the context of Quadruple Helix developmental models. We explain this in terms of the institutional logics of engaged universities, in which entrepreneurial logics have emerged in recent decades, that frame the desirable forms of university-society engagement in terms of the economic benefits they bring. We ask whether institutional logics could explain this resistance of universities to social innovation. Drawing on two case studies of universities sincerely committed to supporting social innovation, we chart the effects of institutional logics on university-supported social innovation. We observe that there is a “missing middle” between enthusiastic managers and engaged professors, in which four factors serve to undermine social innovation activities becoming strategically important to HEIs. We conclude by noting that this missing middle also serves to segment the operation of Quadruple Helix relationships, thereby undermining university contributions to societal development more generally.
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Quadruple helix approach; Réservé UdeM; Rôle des universités; Université

A dual-functional social innovation process model for low-cost houses through university-enabled initiative - Belayutham, Sheila; Ibrahim, Che Khairil Izam Che; Zulkifli, Assrul Reedza; Ibrahim, Norhati (Construction Innovation-England, 2019)
The purpose of this study is to develop a dual-functional university-enabled social innovation process model on the subject of low-cost houses that addresses the distinct elements of social obligation and university teaching-learning. Design/methodology/approach This study has predominantly adopted a longitudinal single case study approach, where data have been collected through interviews, survey, participant observation, direct observation and document review. The case study details on the social innovation processes, which was conducted by Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. Findings This study has demonstrated the social innovation processes toward addressing the issue of insufficient low-cost houses, concurrently benefitting the teaching-learning dimension. Three sub-innovations have been highlighted in the developed social innovation process model, which are collaboration process, teaching-learning and design-construct innovation. Originality/value The development of the social innovation process model for low-cost houses through university-enabled initiative is a novel establishment, particularly for developing nations, as limited studies have been conducted in this regard. The significant insights into how university could play a role in addressing major social issues, along with their core focus (teaching-learning and research development), is a breakthrough for further diffusions of social innovation by universities.
Number: 2 N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Asie; Enseignement; Innovation sociale; Recherche; Rôle des universités; logement

Academic Entrepreneurship for Social Innovation in Taiwan: The Cases of the OurCityLove Platform and the Forest App - Chan-Yuan, Wong; Ying-Che, Hsieh; Ching-Yan, Wu; Mei-Chih, Hu (Science, Technology & Society, 2019)
This study attempts to extend the definition of social innovation within the context of academic entrepreneurship. We consider how academic entrepreneurs can undertake commercial activities, and which ones, and how these activities contribute to the contexts of social innovation. We explore two cases that are derived from two premier universities in Taiwan in terms of research and academic entrepreneurship: OurCityLove from National Chiao Tung University (NCTU) and the Forest app from National Tsing Hua University (NTHU). The two cases show how social enterprises achieved the financial ability to expand their businesses and create the desired social values. While the first case, derived from NCTU, focused on providing useful information on social spaces, and services for the elderly, parents traveling with babies and those with disabilities (and also creating job opportunities for the latter), the other from NTHU created an app to influence those addicted to playing with their smartphones. The cases illustrate how the two universities capitalised on their technological competencies and academic programmes to support graduates and researchers in venturing into social entrepreneurship.
Number: 3 Num Pages: 446-464 Place: Thousand Oaks, United States Publisher: SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
Keywords: Asie; Réservé UdeM; Rôle des universités

An observational study on the challenges faced by actors in a social innovation ecosystem - Chueri, Luciana; Vasconcelos, Aline; dos Santos, Rodrigo Pereira (Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Management of Digital EcoSystems, 2019)
A social innovation ecosystem is a set of actors from different societal sectors and their environments with legal and cultural norms, supportive infrastructures and many other elements, which enable or inhibit the development of social innovations. In this context, several issues regarding information reuse and integration can be found. In this paper, we present an observational study where a real case of an emerging social innovation ecosystem was modeled and analyzed in order to identify the challenges faced by the actors. Results show the importance of adopting digital ecosystem concepts for an approach in which social innovation actors interact and collaborate through the support provided by a common technological platform, composing what we called as Social Innovation Digital Ecosystem (SIDE). Such approach aims to support social innovation actors towards fostering collaboration, co-creation, knowledge, and information sharing and reuse, enabling the development, dissemination and generation of more effective social innovations.
Keywords: Digital; Innovation sociale; Modèle; Réservé UdeM

A Hub-based University Innovation Model - Prieto Mejia, Samuel; Montes Hincapie, Juan Manuel; Taborda Giraldo, John Alexander; Prieto Mejia, Samuel; Montes Hincapie, Juan Manuel; Taborda Giraldo, John Alexander (Journal of technology management & innovation, 2019)
This article uses a conceptual approach to propose an innovation model for regional universities. It demonstrates that the traditional university encounters several obstacles that hinder its full integration into the development of its respective region and explains why currently known models cannot adapt to regions that have deficient relationships with the government and lack an entrepreneurial base. The new model is based on a structure composed of units called “innovation hubs” and incorporates social innovation, thus permitting the university to become integrated into the regional innovation ecosystems. The Magdalena University in Colombia was used as a reference in developing the model. Keywords: hub; social innovation; university innovation models; regional innovation ecosystems
Number: 1 Publisher: Universidad Alberto Hurtado. Facultad de Economía y Negocios
Keywords: Amérique latine; Colombie; Innovation sociale; Libre accès; Modèle; Partenariat; Pôle d'innovation; Rôle des universités; Université

Co-création de valeur et technologie digitale : quel design pour ces plateformes d’engagement ? Le cas du Photomaton 2.0 - Abbes, Intissar; Troudy, Yossra (Management Avenir, 2017)
Cette recherche traite du rôle des plateformes technologiques pour engager le client dans un processus de co-création de valeur avec l’entreprise. Le cas du Photomaton digital (Sharingbox) est étudié. Des entretiens semi-directifs menés auprès de clients participants à trois événements de marques mais aussi auprès de managers et de responsables de l’entreprise Sharingbox révèlent le rôle de cette technologie à engager les participants dans un acte de co-création en ligne avec la marque, acte qui peut se révéler engageant dans le temps. Cependant, l’efficacité de ces plateformes d’engagement semble contingente aux valeurs perçues de l’expérience de la technologie, à l’image de la marque et au profil de ses clients.
Number: 4 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 1 Publisher: Management Prospective Ed.
Keywords: Co-création; Co-innovation; Co-promotion; Collaboration; Entreprise; Nouvelles technologies; Partenariat; Réservé UdeM

Les méthodes de codesign : une ressource capacitante ? Chapitre 7 - Obœuf, Alexandre; Aiguier, Grégory; Loute, Alain (Journal international de bioéthique et d'éthique des sciences, 2016)
Afin de réfléchir à la relation dans le soin et son apprentissage, dix-sept personnes sont sollicitées pour participer à une journée de codesign. Cette méthodologie consiste, par une succession d’exercices protocolisés, à favoriser la créativité du groupe via une démarche d’intelligence collective. L’article vise à réfléchir aux conditions par lesquelles une telle méthodologie peut devenir une ressource capacitante pour penser l’apprentissage de l’éthique. Le présent travail souligne notamment la place centrale de l’affectivité dans la construction du climat d’innovation et dans le mécanisme de la pensée divergente. L’article ouvre in fine de nouveaux questionnements sur l’articulation des exercices, l’affectivité, le rôle de l’animateur ou encore celui de l’usager. Les perspectives de recherches invitent à un décloisonnement disciplinaire.
Keywords: Biotechnologie; Co-construction; Co-création; Co-design; France; Réservé UdeM

Indigenous innovation - Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience (Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience, 2014)
Overview This research space can be described as an opportunity to explore trust, balance, respect, and understanding in intercultural relationships between indigenous and non-indigenous peoples in Canada, with an overall aim of fostering new, responsible, reciprocal and respectful relationships in place of old conflicts .Preliminary research suggests that social innovations
Keywords: Canada; Centre de recherche universitaire; Libre accès

What is Social Innovation? - Westley Frances (Waterloo Institute for Social Innovation and Resilience, 2014)
Changing the system dynamics that created the problem in the first place "A social innovation is any initiative (product, process, program, project, or platform) that challenges and, over time, contributes to changing the defining routines, resource and authority flows or beliefs of the broader social system in which it is introduced. Successful social innovations have durability, scale and transformative impact. (Frances Westley 2014)

What is social innovation? - SIG - Social Innovation Generation (2012)
Social innovation has enjoyed growing recognition all over the world. But many of us are unsure of how it happens or why we need it. Here's a quick overview…
Directors: _:n2178

Framing improvements of public innovation in a living lab context: Processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement - Fuglsang, Lars; Hansen, Anne Vorre (Research Policy, 2022)
Public innovation has received increasing attention in recent years. Experiments with new governance structures, such as New Public Management and New Public Governance, have challenged the traditional top-down, internally driven forms of innovation in the public sector and have entailed a search for new forms of open, collaborative and interactive innovation, implying a reframing of public innovation activities. However, introducing these new frames of innovation causes uncertainties in the public sector, necessitating better understanding of how public innovation can be changed to address societal needs. This paper uses materials from case studies of 21 public living labs across Europe to analyse the lessons that can be learned from public sector participation in living labs in terms of their contribution to reframing public innovation. The “frame” construct is used to analyse and provide an understanding of how participation in living labs helps public actors to reframe innovation and address public and societal needs. Three living lab framings for changing public innovation are identified (processual learning, restrained space and democratic engagement), and the degree of intensity of these framings with respect to involving stakeholders and addressing societal challenges is discussed. The paper contributes to knowledge of public sector innovation by extending previous accounts of how public innovation can be improved.
Number: 1
Keywords: Europe; Innovation publique; Laboratoire vivant; Libre accès; Living Labs

Living Labs, innovation collaborative et écosystèmes : le cas de l’initiative « Concept Maturity Levels » dans les Medtech - Béjean, Mathias; Picard, Robert; Bréda, Gabrièle (Innovations, 2021)
Les Living Labs (LLs) sont de nouvelles formes de laboratoires mettant en œuvre des approches collaboratives et expérimentales centrées sur les utilisateurs. Récemment, les capacités des LLs à développer des réseaux d’innovation ouverts et collaboratifs ont été soulignées. Mais les recherches sont encore peu nombreuses, alors même que le phénomène ne cesse d’évoluer en pratique. En s’appuyant sur l’analyse longitudinale d’une initiative en cours, les « Concept Maturity Levels Santé », impulsée par le Forum des Living Labs en Santé et Autonomie, cet article présente une recherche abductive visant à explorer et caractériser la manière dont les LLs peuvent contribuer, au-delà de projets d’innovation temporaires, à structurer des écosystèmes d’innovation ouverts et collaboratifs sur le long terme. En sus de contribuer à la littérature sur les LLs, l’article ouvre de nouvelles pistes de caractérisation des écosystèmes communautaires d’innovation jusqu’ici encore peu étudiés.Code JEL : M100
Number: 2 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 0 Publisher: De Boeck Supérieur
Keywords: France; Innovation collaborative; Laboratoire vivant; Recherche; Réservé UdeM; Santé

Expérimenter la recherche-projet en doctorat : applications dans les champs de la santé et du handicap - Fournier, Pierre; Ménard, Manon; Wrembel, Élisa (Etudes de communication, 2021)
Nous proposons un regard réflexif sur deux expériences de recherche-projet menées dans le cadre de thèses de doctorat. Notre réflexion porte sur les apports et limites de cette démarche dans le cadre de projets ancrés dans les champs de la santé et du handicap, plus spécifiquement des troubles du sommeil et des troubles du spectre de l’autisme. La proposition repose sur la démonstration de l’intérêt de la conception participative propre à la recherche-projet dans ces domaines sensibles au sein desquels l’enjeu de l’inclusion des acteurs apparaît comme majeur.
Number: 1 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 0 Publisher: Université de Lille
Keywords: Innovation inclusive; Innovation sociale; Projets participatifs; Recherche; Réservé UdeM

Emancipatory Social Innovation: Within and Beyond the Innovative Society - Lachapelle, Marc D. (Voluntas, 2021)
Social innovation (SI) is a promising concept that has been developed and mobilized in academia, government policies, philanthropic programs, entrepreneurial projects. Scholars propose multiple conceptions and categorization of what is SI (trajectories, approaches, theoretical strands, paradigms, streams). Some recent work has also addressed the question of who is doing SI. In both cases, the what and the who remain the key characteristic of SI. Two approaches are confronted: one where SI is more presented as a concept that reproduces the neoliberal–capitalist societies; a second that conceives SI as a transformative and emancipatory pathway. With this article, I contribute to the possibilities to conceive SI as performative concept. My proposition is to analyze SI as a discourse with precise performative practices and apparatus. By doing so, it allows scholars and practitioners to better reflect and identify the effects, tensions and ambivalence and possibilities of SI. Moreover, it gives us few key aspects of what might constitute an emancipatory social innovation.
Number: 5 N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Université

Innovation governance in the forest sector: Reviewing concepts, trends and gaps - Weiss, Gerhard; Hansen, Eric; Ludvig, Alice; Nybakk, Erlend; Toppinen, Anne (Forest Policy & Economics, 2021)
Innovation in the forest sector is a growing research interest and within this field, there is a growing attention for institutional, policy and societal dimensions and particular when it comes to the question of how to support innovativeness in the sector. This Special Issue therefore focuses on governance aspects, relating to and bridging business and political-institutional-societal levels. This includes social/societal factors, goals and implications that have recently been studied under the label of social innovation. Furthermore, the emergence of bioeconomy as a paradigm and policy goal has become a driver for a variety of innovation processes on company and institutional levels. Our article provides a tentative definition of "innovation governance" and attempts a state-of-art review of innovation governance research in the forest sector. For structuring the research field, we propose to distinguish between organizational/managerial, policy or innovation studies. For the forestry sector, specifically, we suggest to distinguish between studies focusing on (i) innovative governance of forest management and forest goods and services; on (ii) the governance of innovation processes as such, or (iii) on specific (transformational) approaches that may be derived from combined goals such as innovation governance for sustainability, regional development, or a bioeconomy. Studies in the forest sector are picking up new trends from innovation research that increasingly include the role of societal changes and various stakeholders such as civil society organizations and users. They also include public-private partnership models or participatory governance. We finally should not only look in how far research approaches from outside are applied in the sector but we believe that the sector could contribute much more to our general scientific knowledge on ways for a societal transformation to sustainability. • We sketch the state-of-knowledge in innovation governance in the forest sector. • We provide a definition and possible categorizations of innovation governance. • We discuss recent research avenues, including social innovation and bioeconomy. • We assess how this Special Issue contributes to our scientific knowledge. • We discuss state of art, research gaps and possible future research directions.
Keywords: Bioéconomie; Fôrets; Gouvernance; Innovation; Réservé UdeM

Laboratoires vivants en innovation sociale et coconstruction des connaissances dans les villes : les cas du TIESS (Montréal) et de l’OBISF (Florianópolis) - Magalhaes, Thiago; Camus, Annie; Andion, Carolina; Tello-Rozas, Sonia (Revue Organisations & territoires, 2020)
Le débat sur le rapport entre l’innovation sociale et les villes s’est élargi au cours des dernières décennies. Ce débat met en évidence l’intérêt suscité par les processus de coconstruction des savoirs dans les laboratoires vivants en innovation sociale (LVIS). Cet article a pour objectif de présenter une approche conceptuelle et analytique du traitement des LVIS, ainsi que de décrire et de mettre en perspective deux expériences de mise en oeuvre de LVIS dans les villes : l’Observatoire de l’innovation sociale de Florianópolis (OBISF) au Brésil et Territoires innovants en économie sociale et solidaire (TIESS) à Montréal au Canada. Bien qu’ils émergent dans des réalités et des contextes différents avec des méthodologies de mise en oeuvre spécifiques, qui sont présentées dans le texte, la discussion et l’analyse des deux cas apportent des pistes d’apprentissage sur les défis et les perspectives quant à la coconstruction des connaissances visant à renforcer les dynamiques d’innovation sociale à l’échelle d’une ville.
Number: 2
Keywords: Brésil; Canada; Co-construction; Laboratoire vivant; Living Labs; Montréal; Réservé UdeM; Urbanisme; Économie sociale; Économie solidaire

From technological to social innovation – the changing role of principal investigators within entrepreneurial ecosystems - Carl Johannes (Journal of Management Development, 2020)
Purpose: By taking a micro-level perspective, this paper aims to examine the influence of the ongoing paradigm shift from technological to social innovation on principal investigators (PIs) and thereby links the two emerging research fields of entrepreneurial ecosystems and social innovation. The purpose of this paper is to build the basis for future empirical analyses. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is a conceptual paper and therefore focuses on theoretical considerations. Taking a quadruple helix approach, PIs are outlined as central actors of entrepreneurial ecosystems and transformative agents of the innovation process. Findings: PIs can proactively shape the innovation process and thus the shift from technological to social innovation, through various channels. They can affect all other actors of the quadruple helix, e.g. by exerting influence on the process of scientific change, on the public opinion and/or on the industry partners. Further, the paradigm shift might change the universities' role in the quadruple helix, substantiating their importance in the process of social change. Practical implications: As PIs are influencing all other actors of the quadruple helix, they are central actors of entrepreneurial ecosystems and thus crucial players in the innovation process. Hence, they need to be supported in fulfilling their role of transformative agents, accelerating and shaping the paradigm shift from technological to social innovation. Universities should therefore reconsider their missions and vision as well as their role within the society. Originality/value: This paper considers the influence of an ongoing paradigm shift from technological to social innovation on entrepreneurial ecosystems. This work focuses especially on the PIs' role as transformative agents. Therefore, it builds a bridge from entrepreneurial ecosystems to social innovation and thus contributes to both research fields. Moreover, the paper shows the great potential of PIs to influence and shape social innovation.
Number: 5
Keywords: Entrepreneurial; Innovation sociale; Quadruple helix approach; Réservé UdeM; Technologie; Université

Documentary research on social innovation in health in Latin America. - Castro-Arroyave, D. M.; Duque-Paz, L. F. (Infectious Diseases of Poverty, 2020)
Background: Identifying social innovation in health initiatives, promoting quality of life through them, and transforming current health conditions demand the knowledge, comprehension and appropriation of the theoretical and methodological developments of this concept. Academic developments in social innovation have mainly occurred in and been documented for English-speaking countries, although...
Number: 41 Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Keywords: Amérique latine; Innovation sociale; Libre accès; Santé

Le living lab, un intermédiaire d’innovation ouverte pour les territoires ruraux ou péri-urbains ? - Fasshauer, Ingrid; Zadra-Veil, Cathy (Innovations, 2020)
L’objectif de cet article est d’analyser une nouvelle forme organisationnelle, le living lab (LL) et sa capacité à favoriser l’innovation territoriale en milieu rural ou péri-urbain. A travers une revue de littérature et la mobilisation de la sociologie de l’acteur-réseau (Callon, 1986 ; Latour, 1987), nous positionnons les living labs comme intermédiaires d’innovation ouverte dont les caractéristiques permettent d’intégrer de nombreux acteurs hétérogènes, établissements publics, entreprises privées, associations et citoyens, sur des projets d’innovation. L’étude d’un LL rural met en évidence la capacité d’une telle structure à reconfigurer des réseaux d’acteurs pour proposer une série de tiers-lieux adaptés aux spécificités des territoires sur lesquels ils s’implantent. Cette recherche permet d’enrichir la réflexion la pérennisation des tiers-lieux ruraux et leurs spécificités par rapport aux espaces urbains.
Number: 1 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 1 Publisher: De Boeck Supérieur
Keywords: Collaboration; Innovation; Innovation ouverte; Laboratoire vivant; Living Labs; Réservé UdeM; Économie collaborative

L’entreprise sous le prisme des combinaisons des méthodes d’agilité, de créativité et de veille - Goria Stéphane (Marche et organisations, 2020)
L’adjectif « agile » est désormais employé pour qualifier un idéal d’entreprises dynamiques et innovantes. De fait, deux interprétations de ce terme peuvent être envisagées. La première renvoie à la mise en place systématique d’une gestion de projet en mode agile, c’est-à-dire se conformant à certaines valeurs et principes formulés dans un manifeste. Celui-ci met notamment l’accent sur le développement en cycles courts, le travail en petite équipe, une conception en collaboration avec les clients et l’acceptation bienveillante des changements de besoins. La seconde se rapporte à une entreprise capable de répondre plus vite et mieux que ses concurrentes à des changements environnementaux. Dans ces deux cas, la créativité et la veille jouent un rôle important. Elles permettent à l’entreprise de rester agile en : identifiant les changements environnementaux, alertant sur ses propres routines, envisageant rapidement des réponses pertinentes pour ses clients et, autant que possible, surprenantes pour ses concurrents.
Number: 3 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 0 Publisher: L'Harmattan
Keywords: Entreprise; Informatique; Innovation agile; Intelligence collective; Performances; Réservé UdeM

Du modèle québécois à l’autoritarisme. La résilience des associations à l’épreuve - Lachapelle, René; Bourque, Denis (Du social business à l’économie solidaire, 2020)
Face à la conception technocratique et entrepreneuriale portée par les pouvoirs publics, une approche alternative de l’innovation sociale, plus populaire et moins visible, à travers l’exploration d’initiatives citoyennes. Prenant comme point de départ le constat d’une appropriation institutionnelle de l’innovation sociale, orientée vers la compétitivité et l’efficacité marchande des expériences de l’économie sociale et solidaire, l’ouvrage vise à la fois à apporter un regard critique sur cette conception de l’innovation sociale et à remettre en lumière des expérimentations citoyennes peu prises en compte par les pouvoirs publics. Il montre ainsi la nécessité d’un tournant épistémologique valorisant les dynamiques de coproduction des savoirs et des politiques entre acteurs, chercheurs et institutions.
Keywords: Associations; Concertation; Gestion axée sur les résultats; Innovation sociale; Philanthropie; Québec; Réservé UdeM; Santé; Éco-développement; Économie sociale; État

Implementation of triple bottom line to a business model canvas in reverse logistics - Wit, Bogdan; Pylak, Korneliusz (Electronic Markets, 2020)
Waste generation, especially hazardous waste, can strongly affect the environment and human lives. There is an urgent need to implement sustainable hazardous waste management tools to reduce their harmful impact on the environment stemming from incorrect waste management. However, there is still a lack of business model concepts combining sustainable development and risk management in reverse logistic value chains for hazardous waste. Therefore, the authors develop a novel sustainable business model canvas for both an entity and the logistics system using the Osterwalder's Business Model Canvas integrated with the concept of sustainable development in economic, social and environmental areas (Triple Bottom Line, TBL) and risk-related elements. Then, using the developed sustainable business model canvas, the model for the logistics system for the treatment of hazardous waste containing asbestos was successfully created. The model was implemented in the prototype of computer software in the form of electronic network services.
Number: 4 Place: Heidelberg Publisher: Springer Heidelberg WOS:000531754400001
Keywords: Informatique; Innovation logistique; Réservé UdeM; numérique

Creative Collaboration - Yong, Titus (Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 2020)
Creative collaboration happens when a creative process is undertaken by two or more individuals, teams, entities, or organizations for a project or challenge of common concern. Typically, the project is too challenging to be undertaken alone; and if done satisfactorily, the outcome is would be both novel and useful. Members can collaborate either physically or remotely through electronic (online creative collaboration) or other means at all or different phases of the project.
Keywords: Co-création; Innovation; Participation; Réservé UdeM

Les enjeux de la transition numérique et de l’innovation collaborative dans les mutations du travail et du management dans le secteur public - Zacklad, Manuel (Travailler dans les services publics : la nouvelle donne, 2020)
La transformation numérique et l’innovation collaborative ou les notions associées « d’intelligence collective », de « design thinking », « d’agilité » sont en passe de devenir les principaux concepts à la mode du management dans les organisations privées et publiques, au moins au sein des sièges et des directions centrales. Partant d’une description des spécificités des bouleversements introduits par la transition numérique et des technologies capacitantes qu’elle promeut, nous montrons comment les opérateurs sont parfois en demande de plus d’innovations numériques pour améliorer leurs conditions de travail et les services rendus au public, pour autant que celles-ci ne soient pas substitutives et excessivement rationalisantes. Les démarches d’innovation collaborative, soutenues par le haut management de manière parfois paradoxale, contribuent à faciliter ces mutations.
Publication Title: Travailler dans les services publics : la nouvelle donne
Keywords: Co-design; Collaboration; Innovation agile; Innovation collaborative; Intelligence collective; Numérique; Réservé UdeM; Secteur public

Entrepreneurial university dynamics: Structured ambivalence, relative deprivation and institution-formation in the Stanford innovation system - Etzkowitz, Henry; Germain-Alamartine, Eloïse; Keel, Jisoo; Kumar, Caleb; Smith, Kaden Nelson; Albats, Ekaterina (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019)
Stanford is a quintessential entrepreneurial university, encouraging firm formation from existing knowledge that the university aggregates as well as new knowledge that it creates. Its founders implanted an academic institution, with scholarly and entrepreneurial ambitions, on a ranch where cattle still graze in the upper campus. In contrast to MIT's founding role in Boston, infusing new technology into an old industrial region's firms, Stanford assisted industrial development in an agricultural region and its industrial interlocutors raised the technical level of the university in mutually beneficial symbiosis (Lecuyer, 2007). The theory and practice of how to “make over” a university into an entrepreneurial actor has come to the forefront of academic and policy attention, internationally, with the European Union sponsoring development of the U-Multirank tool that includes the phenomenon (Van Vught and Ziegele, 2012) and a Brazilian post-graduate student project part of the ITHI Global Entrepreneurial University Metrics (GEUM) initiative that produced a dedicated entrepreneurial university metric (Nerves and Mancos, 2016). As an academic institution propelled to the forefront of global rankings (O'Malley, 2018), while helping create the world's leading high-tech region, Stanford University is in a radically different position from its late 19th century developing region origins. Should Stanford respond to dramatic shift in status and fortune by reverting to an Ivory Tower mode in response to critics who label it “Get Rich U.” (Auletta, 2012)? Or, should it double down on its entrepreneurial heritage and forge more extensive ties to Silicon Valley and other innovation hubs? In 2011, then Stanford President John Hennessy responded to former New York Mayor Bloomberg's request for proposal (RFP) for a university to establish an entrepreneurial campus. Intrigued by the prospect of engaging with the city's financial, art and media complexes, Stanford invested one million dollars in proposal development but eventually withdrew its bid in the face of faculty opposition to diversion of resources as well as Cornell University's munificent counter-offer in alliance with Israel's Technion (Hennessy, 2018). Instead, Hennessy inaugurated a program with an altruistic bent, funding international scholars who will, after pursuing advanced degrees at Stanford, “drive progress for humanity rather than for a select few.” Doubtless, these nascent social entrepreneurs will internalize Silicon Valley's optimistic ideology. Success, as well as entrepreneurial exuberance, creates blinders that suppress disconcerting events, at least temporarily. In the late 00's, generating 7–9 start-ups per annum, the highest rate of any university, Stanford ignored flaws in its technology transfer process that inhibited greater attainment. The research question generated may be stated as follows: how is a hidden innovation gap recognized and resolved? An attitude of, “if it's not broken don't fix it” had taken hold rather than the converse “If it's working well make it better.” Inventions that were too early-stage to be licensed and required translational research or a start-up, languished. The first author faced a dilemma in presenting such less than stellar results from a 2005 study of Stanford's Office of Technology Licensing (OTL) to the Dean of Research, its sponsor: how could such an analysis be taken seriously in the face of overweening achievement? The Dean's response was that, “OTL is not on our radar, they make more money each year.” Nevertheless, neophyte academic entrepreneurs had independently come to a similar conclusion as ours and were impelled to act. Their initiatives are the subject matter of this article. Skeptical of Stanford's relevance to aspiring universities, Jacob et al. (2003) hold that, “The reality of building an entrepreneurial university… is an arduous task for which there is no blueprint.” Yet, a potentially replicable organizational design may be discerned by changing the focal point from Silicon Valley's efflorescence to Stanford's entrepreneurial dynamic. The article proceeds as follows. Section 2 outlines a theoretical framework for the entrepreneurial university and reviews its literature. Section 3 presents a research design to investigate the “paradox of success,” its causes and cures. Section 4 presents a series of initiatives instituted to enhance the Stanford Innovation System. Section 5 formulates an organizational change thesis, linking design thinking to Institution Formation Sociology and social with technological innovation. Section 6 proposes policy measures to improve the Stanford Innovation System in particular and the entrepreneurial university model, in general. Finally, Section 6 sums up research insights, notes study limitations and outlines future research.
Num Pages: 13 Place: New York, United Kingdom Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Keywords: Entrepreneurial; Réservé UdeM; Système d'innovation; Université; numérique

Gestión universitaria de la innovación social promovida desde espacios académicos relacionados con el emprendimiento, la investigación y la proyección social - Jurado-Paz, Irina Margarita; Morán-Vallejo, Michael Alexander (Revista de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, 2019)
This article shows the diagnosis of the Interdisciplinary Rural Internship Program, PIRI, held in a university institution in order to identify elements to improve its implementation. The research is descriptive, with a mixed approach, where surveys and interviews were used to collect information. A sample of 214 students was considered, belonging to different programs of the Autonomous University Corporation of Nariño. The results indicate significant contributions from PIRI to the institutions and to the students who have participated in the program. PIRI is used in an educational space for students to develop skills and apply their knowledge on issues related to social innovation. However, there are also difficulties such as the low number of participants, together with the lack of clear procedures that allow an adequate articulation of the entities linked to PIRI. In this sense, a model was formulated to facilitate the university management of social innovation in the institution under study, which articulates the dependencies of entrepreneurship, research and social projection, so that the benefits are oriented both to the university community and to the territories.
Number: 2
Keywords: Amérique latine; Colombie; Innovation sociale; Libre accès; Rôle des universités

Good and Bad Innovation: What Theory and Practice Do We Need to Distinguish Them? - Mulgan, Geoff (Social Innovation: How Societies Find the Power to Change, 2019)
Technology is the answer, but what was the question? Introduction Many firms, charities and governments are in favour of more innovation, and like to side with the new against the old. But should they? A moment's reflection shows that it's not altogether coherent (whether intellectually, ethically or in terms of policy) to simply be in favour of innovation, whether that innovation is a product, a service or a social idea. Some innovations are unambiguously good (like penicillin or the telephone). Others are unambiguously bad (like concentration camps or nerve gas). Many are ambiguous. Pesticides kill parasites but also pollute the water supply. New surveillance technologies may increase workplace productivity but leave workers more stressed and unhappy. Smart missiles may be good for the nations deploying them and terrible for the ones on the receiving end.In finance, Paul Volcker, former head of the US Federal Reserve, said that the only good financial innovation he could think of was the automated teller machine. That was an exaggeration. But there is no doubt that many financial innovations destroyed more value than they created, even as they enriched their providers, and that regulators and policy makers failed to distinguish the good from the bad, with very costly results. In technology, too, a similar scepticism had emerged by the late 2010s, with digital social media described as the ‘new tobacco’, associated with harm rather than good, with addiction rather than help. Or, to take another example: when the US Central Intelligence Agency's venture capital arm, In-QTel, invested heavily in firms like Palantir, which then became contractors for the intelligence and military (a prime example of the ‘entrepreneurial state’), it was far from obvious how much this was good or bad for the world.The traditional justification for a capitalist market economy is that the net effects of market-led innovation leave behind far more winners than losers, and that markets are better able to pick technologies than bureaucracies or committees. But even if, overall, the patterns of change generate more winners than losers, there are likely to be some, perhaps many, cases where the opposite happens. It would be useful to know.
Keywords: Innovation; Innovation financière; Innovation sociale; Investissement; Réservé UdeM; États-Unis

Integrating Co-Creation, Design Thinking and Responsibility – tools and methods for participatory innovation processes (working title) - Vogel-Pöschl, Heike; Kuhn, Rainer; Maisch, Bettina; Schönherr, Norma; Martinuzzi, André (Proceedings of ISPIM Conferences, 2019)
Responsible Innovation can be the corporate answer to tackle the grand societal challenges. However, companies still have not implemented the concept in their daily innovation practices. Furthermore, citizens, as the voice of societal needs and issues, only have been involved in corporate innovation processes (design thinking, co-creation) on a very limited scale. This raises the question on how to enable the participation of citizens in corporate innovation processes in an effective and efficient way. Therefore, certain quality criteria need to be defined and tested, which has not been researched before in such a context. The aim of this exploratory case study, thus, is to develop and test quality criteria of citizen participation and find out what quality companies can reach in 20 pilot-workshops all over Europe.
N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Co-création; Europe; Participation; Participation citoyenne

Data activism and social change - Gutiérrez, Miren (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)
This book efficiently contributes to our understanding of the interplay between data, technology and communicative practice on the one hand, and democratic participation on the other. It addresses the emergence of proactive data activism, a new sociotechnical phenomenon in the field of action that arises as a reaction to massive datafication, and makes affirmative use of data for advocacy and social change. By blending empirical observation and in-depth qualitative interviews, Gutiérrez brings to the fore a debate about the social uses of the data infrastructure and examines precisely how people employ it, in combination with other technologies, to collaborate and act for social change.
Keywords: Changement social; Collaboration; Data collaboratives; Réservé UdeM; Technologie

Contexts of Co-creation: Designing with System Stakeholders - Jones, Peter (Systemic Design: Theory, Methods, and Practice, 2018)
The concept of co-creation includes a wide range of participatory practices for design and decision making with stakeholders and users. Generally co-creation refers to a style of design or business practice characterized by facilitated participation in orchestrated multi-stakeholder engagements, such as structured workshops and self-organizing modes of engagement. Co-creation envelopes a wide range of skilled social practices that can considerably inform and enhance the effectiveness of organizational development, collaboration, and positive group outcomes. New modes of co-creation have emerged, evolving from legacy forms of engagement such as participatory design and charrettes and newer forms such as collaboratories, generative design, sprints, and labs. Often sessions are structured by methods that recommend common steps or stages, as in design thinking workshops, and some are explicitly undirected and open. While practices abound, we find almost no research theorizing the effectiveness of these models compared to conventional structures of facilitation. As co-creation approaches have become central to systemic design, service design, and participatory design practices, a practice theory from which models might be selected and modified would offer value to practitioners and the literature. The framework that follows was evolved from and assessed by a practice theory of dialogic design. It is intended to guide the development of principles-based guidelines for co-creation practice, which might methodologically bridge the wide epistemological variances that remain unacknowledged in stakeholder co-creation practice.
Keywords: Co-création; Collaboration; Japon; Recommandations; Réservé UdeM

L’innovation sociale au sein d’une entreprise de la silver economy - Fustec, Benjamin Le (Recherche et Cas en Sciences de Gestion, 2017)
L’entreprise ReSanté-Vous est positionnée sur le secteur de la santé, à destination des personnes âgées. Elle a élaboré une proposition de valeur fondée sur l’innovation sociale. L’étude du cas de ce business model permet de discuter des critères permettant de définir un tel métier, et dans quelle mesure les modèles existants sont bien adaptés à ses dimensions sociales et solidaires, ou de création de valeur sociétale. L’exposé du cas débouche sur l’identification d’une série de forces et faiblesses du modèle économique, et la nécessité de mieux appréhender le concept d’impact social.
Number: 1 Bibliographie_available: 1 Cairndomain: www.cairn.info Cite Par_available: 0 Publisher: EMS Editions
Keywords: Entreprise; France; Innovation sociale; Responsabilité sociale; Réservé UdeM; Santé

First domino tile in the social innovation process: Idea creation of university students - Yıldırım, Nihan; Ansal, Hacer (2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2016)
Interrelations between creativity, innovativeness and entrepreneurial skills of individuals have long been discussed in the literature. Due to the challenges regarding their measurement, most studies focused on the intentions rather than the outcomes. The idea generation that requires creativity is the first stage of social innovation. The young population's creative potentials in participating social innovation practices deserve a special attention as they play a critical role in the innovativeness and entrepreneurship of societies. This study aims to explore the factors that determine the creative intentions of university students that are important in generating social innovation projects. A structured survey based on the literature was conducted among 600 management and engineering students from 3 universities from the different percentiles of the Entrepreneurial and Innovative University Index for 2012 of the Turkish Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology. The survey included questions on the demographic characteristics, environmental factors, motivators, university/institutional context, perceptions and creative thinking attitudes. By conducting reliability and factor analysis, accuracy and validity of data is tested and the impact factors were identified. Findings reveal that visionary attitude, curiosity, exploration and learning, attitude for own creativity, self-esteem, perception about the learnability of creativity, university and social environment are components of creative thinking intentions of students and some of these factors vary by year of study and university.
Keywords: Entrepreneuriat; Europe; Innovation sociale; Réservé UdeM; Rôle des universités; Université

Rediscovering the Cooperative Enterprise: A Systematic Review of Current Topics and Avenues for Future Research - Camargo Benavides, Andres Felipe; Ehrenhard, Michel (VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2021)
For decades, the cooperative enterprise (CE) produces market goods and/or provides services in the interest to its members, such as communities, customers, and suppliers. The upsurge of interest in social enterprises, and their balancing of social and economic interests, has also led to a renewed interest in CEs, often seen as a speciﬁc type of social enterprise. However, from an organizational perspective, this renewed interest has been both limited and scattered over a variety of ﬁelds. In this paper, we systematically review papers on CE in the mainstream organizational literature, deﬁned as literature in the ﬁelds of economics, business, management and sociology. Our review integrates and synthesizes the current topics in the mainstream organizational literature and provides a number of avenues for future research. In addition, we compare our ﬁndings in the organizational literature to the social issues literature as these appeared to be quite complimentary. We found multilevel studies, determination of social impact—in particular measurable impact, managerial practices for sustainable (organisational) development, and the entrepreneurial opportunity generation process as the four key avenues for future research.
Number: 5
Keywords: Coopératives; Entreprise; Entreprise sociale; Recherche; Réservé UdeM

Chaire In.SITU en stratégies intégrées Transports-Urbanisme - Chair In.SITU, ESG USQAM (Chaire In.SITU Innovations en stratégies intégrées transport-urbanisme, 2021)
Site de la Chaire In.SITU | Recherche-innovation en stratégies intégrées Transports-Urbanisme de l'ESG UQAM Accès à des publications académiques, rapports et études, et les Cahiers In.SITU Cahier 1 - Les conditions de réussite d’un TOD : Retour sur la journée de réflexion du 28 janvier 2016 (TOD : transit-oriented development) Cahier 2 - Vivre et se déplacer, d’hier à aujourd’hui Montréal et Boucherville en exemples Cahier 3 - Portrait des disparités en matière de mobilité dans l’agglomération de Montréal Cahier 4 - Étude sur les facteurs et politiques de mobilité durable : le cas de la dépossession et réduction de l’usage de l’automobile Cahier 5 - La gestion de la demande : Revue des pratiques Cahier 6 - Inventaire illustré et raisonné de la gestion de la demande Cahier 7 - La gestion de la demande : analyse critique d’un registre d’action collective
Keywords: Développement Durable-Responsabilité Sociale (DD-RS); Libre accès; Mobilité; Montréal; Québec; Transport; Urbanisme

Nourishing the Social Innovation Debate with the “Social Technology” South American Research Tradition - Marlei, Pozzebon; Tello-Rozas, Sonia; Heck, Isabel (Voluntas, 2021)
Inspired by the South American research tradition known as “social technology,” this article proposes an operational framework to advance the understanding of mechanisms that help to promote social transformation. To illustrate its theorizing potential, we apply the framework to a nonprofit organization–Parole d’excluEs–that was created in Montreal (Canada) in 2006 and that has been promoting citizen mobilization and commitment to social change (parole-dexclues.ca). To that end, we offer a theoretical paper with an empirical illustration as a first step in a reflection on employing a global South theoretical lens–drawing on the concept of social technology–to make sense of a global North social innovation experience and to advance existing knowledge on the mechanisms of social transformation. The results contribute to social innovation research and practice, particularly at the interface between the management and nonprofit literatures.
Number: 3 N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Amérique latine; Canada; Changement social; Innovation sociale; Montréal; Recherche; Technologie sociale; Transformations

Strengthening social innovation in higher education institutes - an organizational change process involving staff and students - Prantl, Judith; Freund, Susanne; Kals, Elisabeth (Social Enterprise Journal, 2021)
Purpose In recent decades, higher education institutes (HEIs) have come under pressure to cooperate with society as a whole. This shift towards an increased focus on third mission and social innovation activities implies a substantial organizational change process for many HEIs, as they need to initiate both structural and cultural changes. This paper provides guidance for such change processes by examining the views and attitudes of academic and administrative staff, as well as students within the HEIs over a period in which the HEIs increase their focus on social innovation. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a longitudinal quantitative approach consisting of a survey of administrative and academic staff, as well as students at two German HEIs. The authors studied members' attitudes towards third mission and social innovation activities (N = 3470). Findings Results suggest that the university members' attitudes towards third mission and social innovation are positive but change to some extent over time. Different aspects shape the attitudes within the three groups (administrative staff, academic staff and students). Furthermore, attitudes vary among academic employees who are involved in the process and those who are not. Practical implications The findings provide useful information for university managers and anyone aiming to promote social innovation at HEIs. Originality/value The study examines how attitudes of university members change whenever social innovation takes place at HEIs. This study includes data on the participation and empowerment of all HEI members in view of the important role that HEIs can play as supporters of social innovation.
N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Rôle des universités; Université

Social innovation in high-quality agricultural systems: metrics for assessing processes and outcomes - Santini Pigatto, Giuliana Aparecida; Brunori, Gianluca (Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 2021)
Social innovation and high-quality agricultural systems are important for rural development. However, there is little information on methods for measuring the process and outcome of social innovation, particularly at the regional level. This study aimed to answer the research question: Which social innovation metrics can be applied to analyze rural development at the regional level? We carried out a systematic review of the literature on factors and indicators of social innovation, assessed the characteristics of social innovation in value-added agricultural production systems in developed countries, and proposed social innovation indicators for evaluating value-added agricultural systems in developing countries. Key elements of the process and outcome dimensions of social innovation were identified and used to generate factors, subfactors, indicators, and subindicators. The literature review showed that more research is needed on the outcomes of social innovation. Future studies should investigate the social transformations promoted by rural tourism and biodiversity valorization.
Number: 2
Keywords: Agriculture; Développement rural; Europe; Innovation sociale; Mesure d'impact; Réservé UdeM; Transformations sociales

Technological interventions in social business: Mapping current research and establishing future research agenda - Soni, Gunjan; Mangla, Sachin Kumar; Singh, Pallavi; Dey, Bidit L.; Dora, Manoj (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2021)
Social businesses, despite having a huge potential to generate substantial and sustainable value, are often structurally and financially fragile. Technological interventions, such as social media analytics, big data, Internet of Things, and blockchain can help social businesses by leveraging the practices towards financial and operational sustainability. This study is the first of its kind in that it analyses existing scholarly works on social businesses using bibliometric analysis. In so doing, this paper presents an in-depth statistical analysis of the literature on technological interventions in sustainable social business, showcasing the development of the scholarship, major themes, and possible future research trajectories. The SCOPUS database is used to identify a large section of articles. The study shows that most of the work in social business has been done by scholars based in developed countries, with limited contributions emanating from developing countries. The study proposes a framework for the use of technology in sustainable social businesses with focus areas of research such as social innovation, digital technology, information systems, and decision making for sustainability. The results show that digital technologies are increasingly being accepted as tools for the sustainability and scalability of social businesses. The paper offers useful recommendations for future research in relevant fields.
Num Pages: 1 Place: New York, United Kingdom Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Keywords: Entreprise sociale; Recherche; Réservé UdeM; Social business model; Statistiques; Technologie; numérique

Prefigurative politics and social change: a typology drawing on transition studies - Törnberg, Anton (Distinktion, 2021)
Recent years have seen a surge of interest in prefigurative politics, which refers to the political strategies that model a future society on a micro level and aim to instantiate radical social change in and through practice. While most previous studies have focused on defining the concept and categorizing various types of prefiguration, this paper contributes by investigating under what circumstances prefiguration leads to revolutionary social change. The paper takes an original approach to these issues by turning to transition studies and the socio-technical change literature. This field focuses on the technical equivalence of prefiguration: namely, the relationship between small-scale niche innovations and large-scale technological transitions. Through theoretical discussions and empirical illustrations, this paper presents a typology of five transition pathways through which prefigurative strategies may result in a range of social change outcomes from reformative to revolutionary transformation.
Number: 1
Keywords: Changement social; Histoire; Innovation technologique; Libre accès; Mouvement social; Politiques; Science politique; Technologie; Transition

Pour un questionnement critique de l’innovation sociale - Juan, Maïté; Laville, Jean-Louis (Du social business à l’économie solidaire : Critique de l’innovation sociale, 2020)
L’innovation sociale est largement considérée comme vertueuse. Cependant, le consensus qui semble régner en la matière vient de ce que les représentations et les pratiques englobées sous ce terme recouvrent un faisceau très diversifié d’approches et de réalités. Cette polysémie permet à de nombreux auteurs de se ranger sous une même bannière alors qu’ils ont des références et des orientations distinctes, voire divergentes. L’éloge unanime de l’innovation sociale ne saurait donc faire illusion. À cet égard, un travail introductif autour de l’innovation sociale a mis en évidence deux acceptions contrastées. La première version, qui peut être qualifiée de faible, aménage le système existant, insiste sur l’importance de l’épreuve marchande et valorise l’entreprise privée dans sa capacité à trouver de nouvelles solutions aux problèmes de société. La seconde version, qui peut être désignée comme forte, affiche une visée transformatrice ; elle prône, en réaction à la démesure du capitalisme marchand, une articulation inédite entre pouvoirs publics et société civile pour répondre aux défis écologiques et sociaux. La première se contente d’une amélioration du modèle économique dominant, l’innovation s’inscrivant dans une perspective réparatrice et fonctionnelle, tandis que la seconde a pour caractéristique un questionnement critique de ce modèle, et a pour horizon une démocratisation de la société.
Keywords: Innovation sociale; Réservé UdeM; Transformations; social business; Économie sociale; Économie solidaire

The Landscape of Social Innovation in Canadian Universities: An Empirical Analysis - Milley, Peter; Szijarto, Barbara; Bennett, Kristen (Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 2020)
La dernière décennie a été marquée par une croissance mondiale du nombre d’initiatives d’innovation sociale lancées dans le secteur universitaire. Ces initiatives visent à résoudre des problèmes sociaux complexes et à induire des changements institutionnels et systémiques. Cette poussée de l’activité d’innovation sociale se produit sans une base de connaissances empiriques bien développée. Nous y contribuons en fournissant une description et une analyse complètes de toutes les initiatives d’innovation sociale auxquelles participe le secteur universitaire canadien, de leurs caractéristiques et du paysage qu’elles constituent. Résultats notables: près de la moitié des 96 universités canadiennes sont associées à au moins une initiative; de nombreuses initiatives sont interdisciplinaires et mettent l’accent sur la résolution de problèmes en collaboration avec des secteurs extérieurs à l’université; Les agences gouvernementales et les fondations caritatives sont les sources de financement les plus courantes. Les résultats suggèrent: il existe un potentiel de croissance de l’innovation sociale dans le secteur; il y a moins de liens internes et de regroupement d’initiatives que ne le recommande la théorie de l’innovation; l’accent mis sur la collaboration extérieure rejoint la «troisième mission» des universités, qui existe depuis longtemps, mais les innovateurs sociaux ont des objectifs, des méthodes et des processus distincts pour mener à bien cette mission. Nous concluons avec les orientations pour les recherches futures. Keywords / Mots clés: Universities; Higher education; Social innovation; Community engagement; Service mission; Social change; Canada / Universités; Établissements d’enseignement supérieur; Innovation sociale; Engagement communautaire; Mission de service; Changement social; Canada
Number: 1
Keywords: Canada; Innovation sociale; Libre accès; Rôle des universités; Université

TRIZ for Shaping Life-Long Learning - Pariyar, Amit; Kulathuramaiyer, Narayanan; Bala, Poline; Man, Chuah Kee (2020 IEEE 8th R10 Humanitarian Technology Conference (R10-HTC), 2020)
The dependence on digital technologies has seen a significant increase during COVID-19 pandemic, to ensure that social connectivity and work goes on, in spite of lockdowns and the physical controls on movement. Though digital learning is expected to create abundant life-long learning opportunities for learners worldwide in this challenging time, there is a danger to further impose inequalities and inadequate access to quality education and life-long learning for the unconnected or poorly connected population. This paper shares our experience of reengineering a MOOC platform as `Community led MOOCs' to serve the learning needs of most under represented single mother communities in Bario - a remote settlement of Kelabits in the Borneo Island of Malaysia. This paper then explores TRIZ based heuristic models to address the socio-technological barriers to lifelong learning and proposes TRIZ principles that can trigger social innovation and creativity in designing lifelong learning solutions for rural communities.
ISSN: 2572-7621
Keywords: Asie; Internet; MOOC; Objectifs de développement durable; Participation; Réservé UdeM; Technologies; Théorie de Résolution des Problèmes Inventifs (TRIZ); numérique

Realizing the Basic Income: Competing Claims to Expertise in Transformative Social Innovation - Pel, Bonno; Backhaus, Julia (Science & Technology Studies, 2020)
Current social innovation initiatives towards societal transformations bring forward new ways of doing and organizing, but new ways of knowing as well. Their efforts towards realizing those are important sites for the investigation of contemporary tensions of expertise. The promotion of new, transformative ways of knowing typically involves a large bandwidth of claims to expertise. The attendant contestation is unfolded through the exemplar case of the Basic Income in which the historically evolved forms of academic political advocacy are increasingly accompanied by a new wave of activism. Crowd-funding initiatives, internet activists, citizen labs, petitions and referenda seek to realize the BI through different claims to expertise than previous attempts. Observing both the tensions between diverse claims to expertise and the overall co-production process through which the Basic Income is realized, this contribution concludes with reflections on the politics of expertise involved in transformative social innovation.
Number: 2 Num Pages: 83 Place: Tampere, Finland Publisher: European Association for the Study of Science and Technology Section: Article
Keywords: Co-production; Innovation sociale; Innovation sociale transformatrice; Libre accès; Politiques; Transformations

Service Design Thinking and Social Innovation Sustainability - Sultan, Reem; Qaed, Fatema (2020 Second International Sustainability and Resilience Conference: Technology and Innovation in Building Designs(51154), 2020)
Social Innovation is one of the key indicators within the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Currently, service Design and its design thinking processes play a significant role in Innovation for businesses; it proved its social innovation impact in many projects building sustainable solutions. This study aims to highlight the value of implementing service design through the design thinking process in finding a sustainable solution for different social issues. Researchers achieved the aim of this study using qualitative methodology, implementing case study analysis as a method, were 28 design students have been asked to redesign missing social experiences during pandemics. These case studies explain how sustainable solutions can be generated via service design through the design thinking processes. The findings of this research highlight the value of implementing service design with its design thinking process to generate sustainable solutions for different social issues, concluding that this process can be taught and applied by designers to change their mindsets from `final outcome' to the concept of `final demand', aligning then with sustainability for social Innovation.
Keywords: Co-création; Durabilité; Entreprise; Innovation sociale; Objectifs de développement durable; Réservé UdeM; Résilience; Service design; Villes

Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment - Avelino, Flor; Wittmayer, Julia M.; Pel, Bonno; Weaver, Paul; Dumitru, Adina; Haxeltine, Alex; Kemp, René; Jørgensen, Michael S.; Bauler, Tom; Ruijsink, Saskia; O'Riordan, Tim (Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019)
This article responds to increasing public and academic discourses on social innovation, which often rest on the assumption that social innovation can drive societal change and empower actors to deal with societal challenges and a retreating welfare state. In order to scrutinise this assumption, this article proposes a set of concepts to study the dynamics of transformative social innovation and underlying processes of multi-actor (dis)empowerment. First, the concept of transformative social innovation is unpacked by proposing four foundational concepts to help distinguish between different pertinent 'shades' of change and innovation: 1) social innovation, (2) system innovation, (3) game-changers, and (4) narratives of change. These concepts, invoking insights from transitions studies and social innovations literature, are used to construct a conceptual account of how transformative social innovation emerges as a co-evolutionary interaction between diverse shades of change and innovation. Second, the paper critically discusses the dialectic nature of multi-actor (dis)empowerment that underlies such processes of change and innovation. The paper then demonstrates how the conceptualisations are applied to three empirical case-studies of transformative social innovation: Impact Hub, Time Banks and Credit Unions. In the conclusion we synthesise how the concepts and the empirical examples help to understand contemporary shifts in societal power relations and the changing role of the welfare state.
Num Pages: 195 Place: New York, United Kingdom Publisher: Elsevier Science Ltd.
Keywords: Définition; Empowerment; Innovation sociale transformatrice; Réservé UdeM; Université

Space configurations for empowering university-community interactions - Dorland, Jens; Clausen, Christian; Jørgensen, Michael Søgaard (Science and Public Policy, 2019)
Some see universities as a possible source of solutions to enable a sustainable transition and overcome societal challenges. Findings from three multisite case studies of Desis Labs, FabLabs, and Science Shops shed light on how universities can help empower communities and solve societal challenges locally. Adopting a sociotechnical and flat relational perspective inspired by science and technology studies (STS), we focus on the material and spatial aspects of how these spaces are configured, thereby ensuring practical relevance for policy makers and practitioners. Applying an analytical generalization methodology, we condense the qualitative data into a typology of three ideal space-types (i.e. affording, mediating, and impact-oriented) that represent specific configurations of actors, researchers, students, communities, spaces, infrastructure, equipment, facilitators, etc. The ideal space-types empower communities in different ways, require different resources to create and operate, and translate differently into specific local contexts.
Number: 5
Keywords: Communauté d'innovation; Laboratoire vivant; Méthodes; Réservé UdeM; Rôle des universités; Université

Systemic Social Innovation: Co-Creating a Future Where Humans and all Life Thrive - Fisk, Raymond; Fuessel, Angie; Laszlo, Christopher; Struebi, Patrick; Valera, Alessandro; Weiss, Carey (Humanistic Management Journal, 2019)
Society is at a crossroads. Interconnected systems, radical transparency, and rapidly increasing sophistication in skills, communications, and technologies provide a unique context for fostering social innovation at a planetary scale. We argue that unprecedented rates of systemic social change are possible for co-creating a future where humans and all life can thrive. Yet, this requires innovation in the conceptions, practice, teaching, and researching of social innovation itself to reimagine what it is and can be. As a multidisciplinary group of academics, practitioners, and educators, we integrate our perspectives on social innovation and humanistic management to suggest the notion of systemic social innovation. We introduce the concept of “transformative collaboration” as central to facilitating systemic social innovation and propose a multilevel model for accelerating systems change. We then develop an integrated framework for conceptualizing systemic social innovation. Four levels of social impact are identified, and these levels are bracketed with a call for transforming individual consciousness at the micro level and new collective mindsets at the macro level. Blooom is presented as a case study to illustrate transformative collaboration, demonstrate the role of mindset shift in practice, and introduce four key ingredients to systemic social innovation. Finally, a call to action is issued for social innovation practice, teaching, and research. Most importantly, we seek to inspire and accelerate systemic social innovation that enables the flourishing of every human being and all life on earth.
Number: 2
Keywords: Co-création; Collaboration transformatrice; Innovation sociale; Innovation sociale systémique; Réservé UdeM; Systemic social innovation; Technologie

Theories of Social Innovation - Logue, Danielle (Edward Elgar, 2019)
As we grapple with how to respond to some of the world’s most pressing problems, such as inequality, poverty and climate change, there is growing global interest in ‘social innovation’ as a potential solution. But what exactly is ‘social innovation’? This book describes three ways to theorise social innovation when seeking to manage and organize for both social and economic progress.
N'AVONS PAS ACCÈS
Keywords: Australie; Histoire; Innovation sociale; Théorie Néo-Institutionnelle

Social innovation: how societies find the power to change - Mulgan, Geoff (Policy Press, 2019)
The 21st century has brought a cornucopia of new knowledge and technologies. But there has been little progress in our ability to solve social problems using social innovation – the deliberate invention of new solutions to meet social needs - across the globe. Geoff Mulgan is a pioneer in the global field of social innovation. Building on his experience advising international governments, businesses and foundations, he explains how it provides answers to today’s global social, economic and sustainability issues. He argues for matching R&D in technology and science with a socially focused R&D and harnessing creative imagination on a larger scale than ever before. Weaving together history, ideas, policy and practice, he shows how social innovation is now coming of age, offering a comprehensive view of what can be done to solve the global social challenges we face.
Section: ix, 305 pages : illustrations ; 22 cm
Keywords: Définition; Histoire; Innovation sociale; Politiques; Réservé UdeM; Technologie