Radical spatiality: dissident architectural practices in contemporary occupations

Tahrir Square, Occupy Wall Street, and Gezi Park / Taksim Square, are contemporary occupations that unfold a series of dissident actions in the public space, questioning at the same time the relationships between urban architecture and social practices. One of the characteristics of these movements is the inclusion of the virtual space as a generator of actions inside the physical space, forming consequently a new space. Thus, through the use of digital technologies alongside the expansion of social networks, they promote dispositives that create new architectural dynamics and practices in the city, and simultaneously make visible the obsolete state of an urban infrastructure, which is contended by a radical transformation of public spaces in temporal and instantaneous means. In the development of these occupations, a multitude takes form in the physical and virtual public space, the contemporary public space, which alters the image and use of fixed and established spaces, and transforms them in a system of intermittent spaces, affecting subsequently the limits between public and private, exterior and interior, quotidian and exceptional. It produces a new dissident and temporal ad-hoc architecture that conducts to the construction of a Radical Spatiality, allowing to generate a series of architectural practices and processes that are spontaneous and dissident. These relationships focus on architectural elements that are explored and used in a dissident way: acting inside the limits of local urban regulations, analysing spatial current situations, projecting zones to inhabit temporary, constructing light but resistant structures that respond to occupiers’ needs, reconfiguring the organization of urban objects, and applying dispositives to develop a spatial appropriation through collective and performative practices. Furthermore, contemporary occupations are related to two important aspects in the construction of the architectural urban landscape: the design of public spaces and the urban regulations. After the development of these social movements, different local governments have pushed considerably the implementation of public spaces privatization through the urban model “POPS: Privately Owned Public Space,” and the elaboration of an architectural design manual of public spaces. These two tools are applied and reproduced systematically in cities geographically and culturally distant, provoking consequently the construction of a homogeneous architectural urban landscape, displacing the local history and social dynamics, and manifesting the spatial and social control through architectural design. Facing this situation, new architectural practices of post-public spaces are projected as dissident actions that operate collectively, temporary, and intermittently.

https://oa.upm.es/49062/ https://doi.org/10.20868/UPM.thesis.49062 Superviseurs académiques : Atxu Amann Alcocer et Arturo Blanco Herrero