Rechercher
Bibliographie complète 1 183 ressources
-
This webinar includes the experiences and insights from two Québec-based organizations with an approach that yields a huge potential for transformative change.
-
This webinar includes the experiences and insights from two Québec-based organizations with an approach that yields a huge potential for transformative change.
-
Background Social innovations in health are inclusive solutions to address the healthcare delivery gap that meet the needs of end users through a multi-stakeholder, community-engaged process. While social innovations for health have shown promise in closing the healthcare delivery gap, more research is needed to evaluate, scale up, and sustain social innovation. Research checklists can standardize and improve reporting of research findings, promote transparency, and increase replicability of study results and findings. Methods and findings The research checklist was developed through a 3-step community-engaged process, including a global open call for ideas, a scoping review, and a 3-round modified Delphi process. The call for entries solicited checklists and related items and was open between November 27, 2019 and February 1, 2020. In addition to the open call submissions and scoping review findings, a 17-item Social Innovation For Health Research (SIFHR) Checklist was developed based on the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist. The checklist was then refined during 3 rounds of Delphi surveys conducted between May and June 2020. The resulting checklist will facilitate more complete and transparent reporting, increase end-user engagement, and help assess social innovation projects. A limitation of the open call was requiring internet access, which likely discouraged participation of some subgroups. Conclusions The SIFHR Checklist will strengthen the reporting of social innovation for health research studies. More research is needed on social innovation for health.
-
The importance of knowledge co-creation – the joint production of innovation between industry, research and possibly other stakeholders, such as civil society – has been increasingly acknowledged. This paper builds on 13 cross-country case studies and co-creation experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic to characterise the diversity of knowledge co-creation initiatives and identify lessons for policy. The paper identifies a strong rationale for policy to support knowledge co-creation because the benefits of successful co-creation initiatives outweigh the initial co-ordination costs. Moreover, knowledge co-creation initiatives can contribute to democratising innovation. Successful initiatives engage all stakeholders and have effective governance and management structures. They also have clearly defined ownership and use rights of the collaborations’ outcomes and benefit from favourable conditions to operate, including temporary staff mobility and institutional set-ups that facilitate collaboration and effective communication among participants.
-
The importance of knowledge co-creation – the joint production of innovation between industry, research and possibly other stakeholders, such as civil society – has been increasingly acknowledged. This paper builds on 13 cross-country case studies and co-creation experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic to characterise the diversity of knowledge co-creation initiatives and identify lessons for policy. The paper identifies a strong rationale for policy to support knowledge co-creation because the benefits of successful co-creation initiatives outweigh the initial co-ordination costs. Moreover, knowledge co-creation initiatives can contribute to democratising innovation. Successful initiatives engage all stakeholders and have effective governance and management structures. They also have clearly defined ownership and use rights of the collaborations’ outcomes and benefit from favourable conditions to operate, including temporary staff mobility and institutional set-ups that facilitate collaboration and effective communication among participants.
-
Social innovation (SI) is a promising concept that has been developed and mobilized in academia, government policies, philanthropic programs, entrepreneurial projects. Scholars propose multiple conceptions and categorization of what is SI (trajectories, approaches, theoretical strands, paradigms, streams). Some recent work has also addressed the question of who is doing SI. In both cases, the what and the who remain the key characteristic of SI. Two approaches are confronted: one where SI is more presented as a concept that reproduces the neoliberal–capitalist societies; a second that conceives SI as a transformative and emancipatory pathway. With this article, I contribute to the possibilities to conceive SI as performative concept. My proposition is to analyze SI as a discourse with precise performative practices and apparatus. By doing so, it allows scholars and practitioners to better reflect and identify the effects, tensions and ambivalence and possibilities of SI. Moreover, it gives us few key aspects of what might constitute an emancipatory social innovation.
-
Social innovation (SI) is a promising concept that has been developed and mobilized in academia, government policies, philanthropic programs, entrepreneurial projects. Scholars propose multiple conceptions and categorization of what is SI (trajectories, approaches, theoretical strands, paradigms, streams). Some recent work has also addressed the question of who is doing SI. In both cases, the what and the who remain the key characteristic of SI. Two approaches are confronted: one where SI is more presented as a concept that reproduces the neoliberal–capitalist societies; a second that conceives SI as a transformative and emancipatory pathway. With this article, I contribute to the possibilities to conceive SI as performative concept. My proposition is to analyze SI as a discourse with precise performative practices and apparatus. By doing so, it allows scholars and practitioners to better reflect and identify the effects, tensions and ambivalence and possibilities of SI. Moreover, it gives us few key aspects of what might constitute an emancipatory social innovation.
-
Although healthcare managers make increasingly difficult decisions about health innovations, the way they may interact with innovators to foster health system sustainability remains underexplored. Drawing on the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework, this paper analyses interviews ( n=37) with Canadian and Brazilian innovators to identify: how they operationalize inclusive design processes; what influences the responsiveness of their innovation to system-level challenges; and how they consider the level and intensity of care required by their innovation. Our qualitative findings indicate that innovators seek to: 1) engage stakeholders at an early ideation stage through context-specific methods combining both formal and informal strategies; 2) address specific system-level benefits but often struggle with the positioning of their solution within the health system; and 3) mitigate staff shortages in specialized care, increase general practitioners’ capacity or patients and informal caregivers’ autonomy. These findings provide empirical insights on how healthcare managers can promote and organize collaborative processes that harness innovation towards more sustainable health systems. By adopting a RIH-oriented managerial role, they can set in place more inclusive design processes, articulate key system-level challenges, and help innovators adjust the level and intensity of care required by their innovation.
-
Although healthcare managers make increasingly difficult decisions about health innovations, the way they may interact with innovators to foster health system sustainability remains underexplored. Drawing on the Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) framework, this paper analyses interviews ( n=37) with Canadian and Brazilian innovators to identify: how they operationalize inclusive design processes; what influences the responsiveness of their innovation to system-level challenges; and how they consider the level and intensity of care required by their innovation. Our qualitative findings indicate that innovators seek to: 1) engage stakeholders at an early ideation stage through context-specific methods combining both formal and informal strategies; 2) address specific system-level benefits but often struggle with the positioning of their solution within the health system; and 3) mitigate staff shortages in specialized care, increase general practitioners’ capacity or patients and informal caregivers’ autonomy. These findings provide empirical insights on how healthcare managers can promote and organize collaborative processes that harness innovation towards more sustainable health systems. By adopting a RIH-oriented managerial role, they can set in place more inclusive design processes, articulate key system-level challenges, and help innovators adjust the level and intensity of care required by their innovation.
-
This study seeks to unpack the formation mechanisms of social innovation (SI) initiatives in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Subsequently, this study employs a qualitative case study to investigate (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca. Previous research indicated that socio-spatial dynamics are critical for the development of SI initiatives. Furthermore, previous research asserted that universities are imperative to SI in the context of Latin America. Nevertheless, previous research contemplating the formation mechanisms of SI was primarily westerncentric and displayed an inadequacy to acknowledge SI in the context of Latin America. Based on previous research this study presents a theoretical framework that classifies the results in eight typologies based on (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages. All three dimension are classified as either "high" or "low", which grants insights into influential formation mechanisms. Subsequently, a sample of n=10 SI initiatives was compiled and twelve semi-structured interviews with representatives of the SI initiatives were conducted. The results indicate three typologies of SI initiatives. Five SI initiatives were classified as: HLH – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. Four initiatives were classified as: LHH – low local embedding, high trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. One initiative was classified as HLL – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, low university linkages. The results indicate that SI initiatives either seek to address local challenges or direct their efforts to trans-local challenges. Furthermore, universities evidently play a critical role in the formation of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca and Mexico. This study contributes to SI literature by presenting evidence that universities possess critical roles in the formation of SI. Future research should increasingly embed universities into theoretical approaches when investigating SI formation mechanism in Latin America.
-
This study seeks to unpack the formation mechanisms of social innovation (SI) initiatives in Cuernavaca, Mexico. Subsequently, this study employs a qualitative case study to investigate (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca. Previous research indicated that socio-spatial dynamics are critical for the development of SI initiatives. Furthermore, previous research asserted that universities are imperative to SI in the context of Latin America. Nevertheless, previous research contemplating the formation mechanisms of SI was primarily westerncentric and displayed an inadequacy to acknowledge SI in the context of Latin America. Based on previous research this study presents a theoretical framework that classifies the results in eight typologies based on (1) local embedding, (2) trans-local connectivity and (3) university linkages. All three dimension are classified as either "high" or "low", which grants insights into influential formation mechanisms. Subsequently, a sample of n=10 SI initiatives was compiled and twelve semi-structured interviews with representatives of the SI initiatives were conducted. The results indicate three typologies of SI initiatives. Five SI initiatives were classified as: HLH – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. Four initiatives were classified as: LHH – low local embedding, high trans-local connectivity, and high university linkages. One initiative was classified as HLL – high local embedding, low trans-local connectivity, low university linkages. The results indicate that SI initiatives either seek to address local challenges or direct their efforts to trans-local challenges. Furthermore, universities evidently play a critical role in the formation of SI initiatives in Cuernavaca and Mexico. This study contributes to SI literature by presenting evidence that universities possess critical roles in the formation of SI. Future research should increasingly embed universities into theoretical approaches when investigating SI formation mechanism in Latin America.
-
The concepts of entrepreneurship and citizenship intersect more and more in the educational projects of social entrepreneurship. In this article, we have analyzed an experiment conducted by a nonprofit organization whose mission is to increase citizen participation. We are interested in the discourses and tools that it has mobilized for training in social entrepreneurship. Our objective is to uncover the norms and values underlying the conception of citizenship transmitted through the training. We show that there are tensions between the aims of democratic citizenship promoted by the organization and the concept of the citizen that underlies training in social entrepreneurship. Our contribution is twofold: 1) We enrich the literature on education for democratic citizenship by analyzing a new approach, that of education in social entrepreneurship; 2) We take a critical look at the concept of social entrepreneurship when it is used in training for democratic citizenship by analyzing this practice and framing it within the field of social innovation
-
L’histoire a vu son lot d’innovations technologiques et scientifiques dans toutes les époques et sphères de la société : dans les sciences, le transport, les infrastructures, la technologie, les communications et d’autres encore.
-
Dans le document de réflexion et de consultation L’université québécoise du futur, Rémi Quirion, le scientifique en chef du Québec, expose les assises nécessaires à une réflexion de plus grande ampleur sur l’avenir des universités au Québec. Ces assises se déclinent en six points : les tendances susceptibles d’influencer les universités du futur; les éléments importants de l’évolution du système universitaire québécois depuis la fin du XXe siècle; une réflexion concernant plusieurs aspects de la mission universitaire, dont les conditions nécessaires à son accomplissement; les préoccupations fondamentales devant l’inspirer (dont trois nouveaux enjeux pour les universités); une synthèse des différents constats sur lesquels fonder les principales pistes d’action susceptibles de concourir à la pertinence continue de l’institution universitaire. Ces pistes sont celles sur lesquelles le gouvernement propose aux Québécois de se prononcer dans le cadre de consultations en cours et ultérieures. Après avoir présenté le contexte de préparation et le contenu du rapport L’université québécoise du futur, nous exposerons les constats et les recommandations qui en sont issues de la part du scientifique en chef.
-
Dans le document de réflexion et de consultation L’université québécoise du futur, Rémi Quirion, le scientifique en chef du Québec, expose les assises nécessaires à une réflexion de plus grande ampleur sur l’avenir des universités au Québec. Ces assises se déclinent en six points : les tendances susceptibles d’influencer les universités du futur; les éléments importants de l’évolution du système universitaire québécois depuis la fin du XXe siècle; une réflexion concernant plusieurs aspects de la mission universitaire, dont les conditions nécessaires à son accomplissement; les préoccupations fondamentales devant l’inspirer (dont trois nouveaux enjeux pour les universités); une synthèse des différents constats sur lesquels fonder les principales pistes d’action susceptibles de concourir à la pertinence continue de l’institution universitaire. Ces pistes sont celles sur lesquelles le gouvernement propose aux Québécois de se prononcer dans le cadre de consultations en cours et ultérieures. Après avoir présenté le contexte de préparation et le contenu du rapport L’université québécoise du futur, nous exposerons les constats et les recommandations qui en sont issues de la part du scientifique en chef.
-
Inspired by the South American research tradition known as “social technology,” this article proposes an operational framework to advance the understanding of mechanisms that help to promote social transformation. To illustrate its theorizing potential, we apply the framework to a nonprofit organization–Parole d’excluEs–that was created in Montreal (Canada) in 2006 and that has been promoting citizen mobilization and commitment to social change (parole-dexclues.ca). To that end, we offer a theoretical paper with an empirical illustration as a first step in a reflection on employing a global South theoretical lens–drawing on the concept of social technology–to make sense of a global North social innovation experience and to advance existing knowledge on the mechanisms of social transformation. The results contribute to social innovation research and practice, particularly at the interface between the management and nonprofit literatures.
-
The purpose of this paper is to explore multiple Canadian educators' experiences with the Map the System (MTS) competition, designed to foster and grow systems thinking capacity among students exploring complex questions. The challenge has been an opportunity for social innovation programs (from the nascent to the established) across Canadian post-secondaries to engage both with their own communities and with social innovators internationally, connecting social innovation spaces as part of their third mission. Across the organizations, students valued the interdisciplinary and systems thinking qualities, and organizations benefited from the external competition, there remain questions about organizational engagement in social innovation as a deeply transformative process internally. Design/methodology/approach All Canadian post-secondary institutions who participated in the 2020 MTS competition (17) were invited to a digital roundtable to discuss their experiences. Ten were able to participate, representing a range of post-secondaries (including large research institutions, undergraduate-only universities and colleges). To facilitate discussion, participants met to discuss format and topics; for the roundtable itself, participant educators used a google form to capture their experiences. These were summarized, anonymized and redistributed for validation and clarification. To reflect this collaborative approach, all participant educators are listed as authors on this paper, alphabetically after the organizing authors. Findings For students participating in MTS, they have built both their interdisciplinary and systems thinking skills, as well as their commitment to achieving meaningful change in their community. But MTS arrived in fertile environments and acted as an accelerant, driving attention, validation and connection. Yet while this might align with post-secondary education’s third mission, educators expressed concerns about sustainability, internal commitment to change and navigating tensions between a challenge approach and collaborative work, and internal work and national competition limitations. This complicates the simple insertion of MTS in a post-secondary’s social innovation-related third mission. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to Canadian post-secondaries participating in MTS, and therefore are not representative of either post-secondaries in Canada, or all the MTS participants although Canada is well represented in the challenge itself. Additionally, while the authors believe their approach to treat all participants as authors, and ensured multiple feedback opportunities in private and collectively, this is a deliberate and potentially controversial move away from a traditional study. Social implications More than half of Canadian universities (a subgroup of post-secondaries) had at least one social innovation initiative, but questions have been raised about whether these initiatives are being evaluated internally, or are triggering the kinds of transformative internal work that might be an outcome. Understanding the impact of MTS one example of a social innovation-related initiative can help advance the broader conversation about the place (s) for social innovation in the post-secondary landscape – and where there is still significant work to be done. Originality/value As Canada has only participated in MTS for four years, this is the first inter-institution consideration of its related opportunities and obstacles as a vehicle for transformational social innovation. As well, educators talking openly and frankly to educators reinforces the collaborative quality of social innovation across the post-secondary landscape.
-
The purpose of this paper is to explore multiple Canadian educators' experiences with the Map the System (MTS) competition, designed to foster and grow systems thinking capacity among students exploring complex questions. The challenge has been an opportunity for social innovation programs (from the nascent to the established) across Canadian post-secondaries to engage both with their own communities and with social innovators internationally, connecting social innovation spaces as part of their third mission. Across the organizations, students valued the interdisciplinary and systems thinking qualities, and organizations benefited from the external competition, there remain questions about organizational engagement in social innovation as a deeply transformative process internally. Design/methodology/approach All Canadian post-secondary institutions who participated in the 2020 MTS competition (17) were invited to a digital roundtable to discuss their experiences. Ten were able to participate, representing a range of post-secondaries (including large research institutions, undergraduate-only universities and colleges). To facilitate discussion, participants met to discuss format and topics; for the roundtable itself, participant educators used a google form to capture their experiences. These were summarized, anonymized and redistributed for validation and clarification. To reflect this collaborative approach, all participant educators are listed as authors on this paper, alphabetically after the organizing authors. Findings For students participating in MTS, they have built both their interdisciplinary and systems thinking skills, as well as their commitment to achieving meaningful change in their community. But MTS arrived in fertile environments and acted as an accelerant, driving attention, validation and connection. Yet while this might align with post-secondary education’s third mission, educators expressed concerns about sustainability, internal commitment to change and navigating tensions between a challenge approach and collaborative work, and internal work and national competition limitations. This complicates the simple insertion of MTS in a post-secondary’s social innovation-related third mission. Research limitations/implications This study was limited to Canadian post-secondaries participating in MTS, and therefore are not representative of either post-secondaries in Canada, or all the MTS participants although Canada is well represented in the challenge itself. Additionally, while the authors believe their approach to treat all participants as authors, and ensured multiple feedback opportunities in private and collectively, this is a deliberate and potentially controversial move away from a traditional study. Social implications More than half of Canadian universities (a subgroup of post-secondaries) had at least one social innovation initiative, but questions have been raised about whether these initiatives are being evaluated internally, or are triggering the kinds of transformative internal work that might be an outcome. Understanding the impact of MTS one example of a social innovation-related initiative can help advance the broader conversation about the place (s) for social innovation in the post-secondary landscape – and where there is still significant work to be done. Originality/value As Canada has only participated in MTS for four years, this is the first inter-institution consideration of its related opportunities and obstacles as a vehicle for transformational social innovation. As well, educators talking openly and frankly to educators reinforces the collaborative quality of social innovation across the post-secondary landscape.
-
Social innovation is not well understood within the context of macro-social work. Frameworks for understanding social innovation as having dimensions of social entrepreneurship, social intrapreneurship, and social advocacy are elaborated. Challenges to the comprehensive understanding and utility of social innovation for macro social work are discussed, especially an overemphasis on social entrepreneurship as the only typical expression of social innovation as well as a mistargeted, deficit-based approach which assumes that contemporary social work is dysfunctional and can only be made functional through social innovation and entrepreneurship. Global and multidisciplinary insights and applications of social innovation for macro social work are reviewed. Finally, how the macro-social work approach to social innovation builds on and advances business approaches to social innovation is discussed.
Explorer
Sujet
- Accès gratuit sur inscription (7)
- Action collaborative (3)
- Afrique (2)
- Agriculture (2)
- Amérique centrale/sud (14)
- Amérique latine (33)
- Analyse quantitative (2)
- Animation (2)
- Apprentissage (2)
- Appropriation technologique (1)
- Asie (19)
- Associations (2)
- Australie (8)
- Autochtone (2)
- Base de données (1)
- Bases de données terminologiques (16)
- Big Data (4)
- Biodiversité (1)
- Bioéconomie (2)
- Biotechnologie (3)
- Bourses d'études (8)
- Bourses de stages (4)
- Brésil (4)
- Budget (3)
- Canada (83)
- Canevas (3)
- Centre de recherche universitaire (7)
- Changement (1)
- Changement social (8)
- Changement systémique (3)
- Changements climatiques (4)
- Chine (2)
- Co-construction (15)
- Co-création (50)
- Co-design (4)
- Co-innovation (1)
- Co-production (8)
- Co-promotion (1)
- Coconcevoir (2)
- Collaboration (20)
- Collaboration interorganisationnelle (1)
- Collaboration ouverte (2)
- Collaboration transformatrice (2)
- Colombie (4)
- Commerce (1)
- Commerce équitable (2)
- Communautaire (8)
- Communauté d'innovation (8)
- Communautés (1)
- Communautés de pratique (2)
- Compétences (1)
- Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (4)
- Concepts (3)
- Concertation (4)
- Conférence (2)
- Coopération (6)
- Coopératives (3)
- Coopétition (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Créativité collective (2)
- Criminologie (4)
- Culture (2)
- Data (2)
- Data collaboratives (4)
- Data collection (4)
- Décentralisation économique (2)
- Définition (11)
- Délibération (2)
- Déploiement, valorisation, adhésion (1)
- Développement durable (9)
- Développement Durable-Responsabilité Sociale (DD-RS) (8)
- Développement inclusif (2)
- Développement rural (2)
- Développement social (4)
- Développement technologique (2)
- Dialogue (1)
- Digital (9)
- Données massives (2)
- Données ouvertes (8)
- Droit (1)
- Durabilité (11)
- Éco-développement (2)
- Écologie (2)
- Économie (5)
- Économie circulaire (2)
- Économie collaborative (2)
- Économie sociale (16)
- Économie solidaire (9)
- EDI (5)
- Éducation (2)
- Empathie (2)
- Empowerment (2)
- Engagement (2)
- Engagement collectif (4)
- Engagement communautaire (3)
- Enseignement (2)
- Entrepreneurial (6)
- Entrepreneuriat (13)
- Entrepreneuriat social (12)
- Entreprise (14)
- Entreprise sociale (7)
- Équité (2)
- État (2)
- États-Unis (40)
- Ethical, social and environmental accounting (ESEA) (2)
- Éthique (8)
- Éthique de l’IA (2)
- Étude de cas (7)
- Europe (90)
- Évaluation évolutive (2)
- Expérimentation (4)
- Facilitation (1)
- Finance sociale (2)
- Financement (6)
- Focus group (1)
- Fondation (2)
- Fôrets (2)
- Formation (1)
- France (22)
- Francophonie (2)
- Gestion axée sur les résultats (6)
- Gouvernance (4)
- Gouvernement du Canada (14)
- Gouvernement du Québec (6)
- Hackathon (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Healthy cities (1)
- Histoire (12)
- Human–computer interaction (HCI) (2)
- Idéation, dialogue et maillage (28)
- Impact (9)
- Impact environnemental (2)
- Impact social (5)
- Inclusion (3)
- Indicateur (1)
- Inégalités (4)
- Informatique (4)
- Innovation (36)
- Innovation agile (4)
- Innovation collaborative (15)
- Innovation durable (4)
- Innovation financière (2)
- Innovation frugale (3)
- Innovation inclusive (12)
- Innovation logistique (4)
- Innovation ouverte (10)
- Innovation pédagogique (2)
- Innovation publique (2)
- Innovation responsable (4)
- Innovation sociale (120)
- Innovation sociale durable (2)
- Innovation sociale systémique (2)
- Innovation sociale transformatrice (4)
- Innovation sociétale (1)
- Innovation technique (4)
- Innovation technologique (6)
- Intelligence artificielle (16)
- Intelligence collective (12)
- Intelligence de données (2)
- Intelligence incorporée (2)
- Interentreprises (2)
- International (6)
- Internet (8)
- Internet des objets (6)
- Invention (4)
- Investissement (8)
- Isomorphisme (2)
- Japon (2)
- Justice (2)
- Justice cognitive (1)
- Justice épistémique (1)
- Laboratoire d'innovation sociale (2)
- Laboratoire vivant (22)
- Laboratoires d'innovation (1)
- leader humility (1)
- Leadership (1)
- Libre accès (193)
- Licences d'exploitation (1)
- litterature (2)
- Living Labs (12)
- Living labs (1)
- local ecosystem (2)
- logement (2)
- Magazine (4)
- management scholarship (2)
- marginalization (1)
- McConnell Foundation (2)
- Médialab (1)
- Médias sociaux (4)
- Meilleures pratiques (2)
- Mesure d'impact (35)
- Mesure de la perception (6)
- Mesures (2)
- Méthodes (13)
- Mise en valeur (9)
- Mobilisation (2)
- Mobilisation des connaissances (1)
- Mobilisation et tranfert (1)
- Mobilité (2)
- Modèle (8)
- Modèle d'encadrement (1)
- Modèle de réglementation (2)
- Modèle participatif (2)
- Mondialisation (2)
- Montréal (17)
- MOOC (2)
- Mouvement social (2)
- Municipalités (4)
- Nanoscience (2)
- Négociation (1)
- Nord / Sud (1)
- Normes éthiques (1)
- Nouvelles technologies (6)
- numérique (11)
- Numérique (4)
- Objectifs de développement durable (9)
- OBNL (17)
- OCDE (2)
- ONU (4)
- Open source (1)
- Optimisation (2)
- Organisation apprenante (1)
- Organisme de soutien (96)
- Outdoor free-play (1)
- Outil (1)
- Outil numérique (1)
- Outils (18)
- Ouvrages de référence (14)
- Partage (2)
- Partenariat (22)
- Partenariat avec le patient (2)
- Participation (13)
- Participation citoyenne (4)
- Participation publique (1)
- Participatory Design (2)
- Participatory planning (1)
- Participatory research methods (1)
- Participatory Rural Innovation (2)
- Parties prenantes (2)
- Patient partenaire (1)
- Performances (2)
- Personnes en situation de handicap (2)
- Philanthropie (4)
- Planification (11)
- Pluriversalisme (1)
- Pôle d'innovation (2)
- Politiques (12)
- Politiques publiques (8)
- Pratique (2)
- Premiers peuples (1)
- Problem-oriented innovation systems (1)
- Processus d'innovation (4)
- Processus de création (2)
- Projets participatifs (4)
- Propriété intellectuelle (2)
- Prototypage (2)
- Publication gouvernementale (6)
- Publication UdeM (17)
- Quadruple helix approach (8)
- Québec (118)
- Réalité virtuelle (2)
- Recherche (22)
- Recherche-action (2)
- Recherche-action participative (1)
- Recherche collaborative (1)
- Recherche partenariale (1)
- Recommandations (5)
- Relations industrielles (6)
- Réseau (4)
- Réservé UdeM (312)
- Résilience (2)
- Resource-Based View theory (RBV) (2)
- Responsabilité sociale (4)
- Responsabilité sociétale des entreprises (6)
- Responsible research and innovation (4)
- Revue de littérature (1)
- Risques (2)
- Rôle des universités (69)
- Royaume-Uni (2)
- Santé (25)
- Santé publique (6)
- Scaling-up (2)
- science (1)
- Science industrielle (2)
- Science ouverte (3)
- Science politique (8)
- Sciences de l'éducation (3)
- Sciences économiques (8)
- Sciences sociales (5)
- Scientométrie (2)
- Secteur public (4)
- Service design (2)
- social (6)
- social business (3)
- Social business model (5)
- Social entrepreneur (2)
- Social entrepreneurship (9)
- Social finance (2)
- Social Initiative (1)
- Social intrapreneur (1)
- Social movement organisations (2)
- Social technology (3)
- Sociologie (2)
- Solidarités (2)
- Soutien (4)
- Soutien social (2)
- Start-ups (2)
- Startup ecosystem (6)
- Statistiques (5)
- Subventions (3)
- Subventions - Réglementation (2)
- Suisse (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- systematic review (2)
- Système d'innovation (4)
- Systemic social innovation (2)
- Teams (1)
- Techno-sciences (2)
- Technologie (14)
- Technologie sociale (5)
- Technologies (4)
- Technologies intelligentes (2)
- technosciences (4)
- Territoire (2)
- Théorie (1)
- Théorie de Résolution des Problèmes Inventifs (TRIZ) (2)
- Théorie du changement (4)
- Théorie Néo-Institutionnelle (4)
- Thésaurus de base de données (10)
- Thésaurus de bibliothèque (12)
- Transfert (2)
- Transformation sociale (1)
- Transformations (9)
- Transformations sociales (4)
- Transition (2)
- Transition numérique (2)
- Transport (2)
- Travail social (4)
- Triple Helix (2)
- Triple layered business model canvas (1)
- UK (13)
- Université (58)
- Urbanisme (6)
- Utopie (2)
- Valorisation (2)
- Version libre-accès Academia.edu (1)
- Version libre-accès Open Repository (2)
- Version libre-accès ResearchGate (4)
- Villes (2)
- Villes intelligentes (2)
- Vision collective (2)
- VR (2)
- vulgarisation (1)
- Webinaire (2)
Type de ressource
- Article d'encyclopédie (18)
- Article de colloque (53)
- Article de magazine (4)
- Article de revue (331)
- Billet de blog (51)
- Chapitre de livre (45)
- Document (18)
- Enregistrement vidéo (13)
- Entrée de dictionnaire (13)
- Livre (88)
- Page Web (496)
- Présentation (1)
- Rapport (48)
- Thèse (4)
1. Idéation, dialogue et maillages
- 1.1 Diagnostic (2)
- 1.2 Idéation et animation (13)
- 1.3 Dialogue (22)
- 1.4 Maillage (9)
- -Les incontournables (5)
2. Planification
3. Recherche et développement
4. Déploiement, valorisation, pérennisation
5. Évaluation, retombées et impacts
- 5.1 Théories (9)
- 5.2 Méthodes (9)
- 5.3 Indicateurs (6)
- 5.4 Changements systémiques (5)
- - Les incontournables (5)
Approches thématiques et disciplinaires
Définitions
- Définitions de l'innovation sociale (15)
- - Les incontournables (3)
- Termes liés (15)
- Théories (21)
Organismes de soutien
- 01. Stratégies et politiques (11)
- Amérique centrale/sud (12)
- Canada (20)
- États-Unis (11)
- Europe (22)
- Québec (39)