Rechercher
Bibliographie complète 1 183 ressources
-
Ten papers consider new sources of entrepreneurial finance, highlighting angel investors, government interventions, financial technology innovations, and how entrepreneurs' characteristics relate to fundraising success. Papers discuss the role of angel syndicates on the demand and supply of informal venture capital (VC); government intervention in VC markets; the validity of guarantee instruments; green project crowdfunding; linguistic style approaches for gaining empathetic attention from crowdfunding investors; blockchain, cryptocurrency, and initial coin offerings; the development of the minibond market for small and medium-sized enterprises; facilitating access to early-stage equity financing in developing countries; the financial literacy of entrepreneurs; and the pedagogical value of social entrepreneurship competitions at the individual level. Quas is Senior Researcher in Corporate Finance at Universita degli Studi di Milano. Alperovych is Associate Professor of Corporate Finance at EMLYON Business School. Bellavitis is Lecturer of Innovation and Entrepreneurship in the Faculty of Management and International Business of Auckland Business School at the University of Auckland. Paeleman is Assistant Professor at the University of Antwerp. Kamuriwo is Associate Professor in Strategy in the Cass Business School at City, University of London. Index.
-
The idea of social innovation has become increasingly popular in recent years, and as often happens with popular concepts it risks become overloaded. This happens, for instance, when social innovation is seen as the “soft” and humanistic alternative to versions of innovation dominated by science and technology. There has been a fast growing literature on social innovation, some of it in academic publications but perhaps most of it published by think tanks, semigovernmental agencies, and other organizations. Many different institutional fields for social innovation are discussed in the literature (Moulaert et al. 2013). Education is one of them, but much less frequently treated than fields like housing, intercultural relations, environmental issues, and childcare.
-
The idea of social innovation has become increasingly popular in recent years, and as often happens with popular concepts it risks become overloaded. This happens, for instance, when social innovation is seen as the “soft” and humanistic alternative to versions of innovation dominated by science and technology. There has been a fast growing literature on social innovation, some of it in academic publications but perhaps most of it published by think tanks, semigovernmental agencies, and other organizations. Many different institutional fields for social innovation are discussed in the literature (Moulaert et al. 2013). Education is one of them, but much less frequently treated than fields like housing, intercultural relations, environmental issues, and childcare.
-
The socioeconomic challenges caused by aging populations have encouraged many countries to reevaluate the place of the elderly in society as well as to adopt measures in encouraging them to be participative. In recent decades, crowdsourcing has been identified as a rapid growth of innovative Internet-based information and communication technologies in giving the opportunities to educational organizations to reach their goals. With their accumulated skills and knowledge, academic retirees can be resourceful to society. However, their knowledge and experiences seem to be undervalued and underutilized. Retired academics have better opportunity to extend their contribution in the society as their valuable knowledge is more appreciated than people from other background. Retired academics tend to be able to fulfill their desire for professional continuity following retirement more markedly than people from other backgrounds. This paper analyzes the use of crowdsourcing in educational activities, especially for the academic retirees. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to take an exploratory look on how educational organizations use crowdsourcing as part of their activities at the present time, and to suggest how the practice of crowdsourcing may expand to other educational activities in future.
-
The socioeconomic challenges caused by aging populations have encouraged many countries to reevaluate the place of the elderly in society as well as to adopt measures in encouraging them to be participative. In recent decades, crowdsourcing has been identified as a rapid growth of innovative Internet-based information and communication technologies in giving the opportunities to educational organizations to reach their goals. With their accumulated skills and knowledge, academic retirees can be resourceful to society. However, their knowledge and experiences seem to be undervalued and underutilized. Retired academics have better opportunity to extend their contribution in the society as their valuable knowledge is more appreciated than people from other background. Retired academics tend to be able to fulfill their desire for professional continuity following retirement more markedly than people from other backgrounds. This paper analyzes the use of crowdsourcing in educational activities, especially for the academic retirees. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to take an exploratory look on how educational organizations use crowdsourcing as part of their activities at the present time, and to suggest how the practice of crowdsourcing may expand to other educational activities in future.
-
The aim of this research is to explore the dynamics and impact of open social innovation, within the context of fab labs and makerspaces. Using an exploratory methodology based on 12 semi-structured interviews of fab lab founders belonging to The Centres for Maker Innovation and Technology (CMIT) programme – a network of 170 fab labs located in Eastern Europe – this research explores the impact of an adopting an open approach in relation to the different stages of social innovation (prompts, proposals, prototypes, sustaining, scaling and diffusion, systemic change) as well as social impact. The main results of this study are that while the CMIT programme provided each fab lab with similar initial conditions (identical funding, objectives and rules), the open social innovation approached adopted enabled to give birth to a wide diversity of fab labs, each being very well adapted to the local environment, social needs and constraints and able to deliver social impact in just a matter of years; a result that would be hard to achieve with a centralised top-down approach. The study identified three types of CMITs – Education, Industry and Residential – which could be similar or different depending on the stage of social open innovation. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main difficulties social entrepreneurs encounter as a part of the open social innovation process, as well as means to overcome them. In this respect, this study adds to the literature on fab labs by providing more comprehensive view of the challenges faced by fab labs (and makerspaces) founders, as well as suggestions of strategies enabling to ensure their long-term sustainability.
-
The aim of this research is to explore the dynamics and impact of open social innovation, within the context of fab labs and makerspaces. Using an exploratory methodology based on 12 semi-structured interviews of fab lab founders belonging to The Centres for Maker Innovation and Technology (CMIT) programme – a network of 170 fab labs located in Eastern Europe – this research explores the impact of an adopting an open approach in relation to the different stages of social innovation (prompts, proposals, prototypes, sustaining, scaling and diffusion, systemic change) as well as social impact. The main results of this study are that while the CMIT programme provided each fab lab with similar initial conditions (identical funding, objectives and rules), the open social innovation approached adopted enabled to give birth to a wide diversity of fab labs, each being very well adapted to the local environment, social needs and constraints and able to deliver social impact in just a matter of years; a result that would be hard to achieve with a centralised top-down approach. The study identified three types of CMITs – Education, Industry and Residential – which could be similar or different depending on the stage of social open innovation. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main difficulties social entrepreneurs encounter as a part of the open social innovation process, as well as means to overcome them. In this respect, this study adds to the literature on fab labs by providing more comprehensive view of the challenges faced by fab labs (and makerspaces) founders, as well as suggestions of strategies enabling to ensure their long-term sustainability.
-
The aim of this research is to explore the dynamics and impact of open social innovation, within the context of fab labs and makerspaces. Using an exploratory methodology based on 12 semi-structured interviews of fab lab founders belonging to The Centres for Maker Innovation and Technology (CMIT) programme – a network of 170 fab labs located in Eastern Europe – this research explores the impact of an adopting an open approach in relation to the different stages of social innovation (prompts, proposals, prototypes, sustaining, scaling and diffusion, systemic change) as well as social impact. The main results of this study are that while the CMIT programme provided each fab lab with similar initial conditions (identical funding, objectives and rules), the open social innovation approached adopted enabled to give birth to a wide diversity of fab labs, each being very well adapted to the local environment, social needs and constraints and able to deliver social impact in just a matter of years; a result that would be hard to achieve with a centralised top-down approach. The study identified three types of CMITs – Education, Industry and Residential – which could be similar or different depending on the stage of social open innovation. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main difficulties social entrepreneurs encounter as a part of the open social innovation process, as well as means to overcome them. In this respect, this study adds to the literature on fab labs by providing more comprehensive view of the challenges faced by fab labs (and makerspaces) founders, as well as suggestions of strategies enabling to ensure their long-term sustainability.
-
The aim of this research is to explore the dynamics and impact of open social innovation, within the context of fab labs and makerspaces. Using an exploratory methodology based on 12 semi-structured interviews of fab lab founders belonging to The Centres for Maker Innovation and Technology (CMIT) programme – a network of 170 fab labs located in Eastern Europe – this research explores the impact of an adopting an open approach in relation to the different stages of social innovation (prompts, proposals, prototypes, sustaining, scaling and diffusion, systemic change) as well as social impact. The main results of this study are that while the CMIT programme provided each fab lab with similar initial conditions (identical funding, objectives and rules), the open social innovation approached adopted enabled to give birth to a wide diversity of fab labs, each being very well adapted to the local environment, social needs and constraints and able to deliver social impact in just a matter of years; a result that would be hard to achieve with a centralised top-down approach. The study identified three types of CMITs – Education, Industry and Residential – which could be similar or different depending on the stage of social open innovation. Furthermore, this paper discusses the main difficulties social entrepreneurs encounter as a part of the open social innovation process, as well as means to overcome them. In this respect, this study adds to the literature on fab labs by providing more comprehensive view of the challenges faced by fab labs (and makerspaces) founders, as well as suggestions of strategies enabling to ensure their long-term sustainability.
-
- Features interdisciplinary expertise from economics, law, technology and social science on the practice of co-creation - Provides best-practices and management approaches to successful co-creation - Enables research-based and practice-relevant understanding of the background and concepts around co-creation
-
- Features interdisciplinary expertise from economics, law, technology and social science on the practice of co-creation - Provides best-practices and management approaches to successful co-creation - Enables research-based and practice-relevant understanding of the background and concepts around co-creation
-
When it comes to creating a positive & sustainable impact on the lives of Indigenous Peoples living in Montreal, it is important to understand the role that an individual occupies and plays within the collective experience
-
This chapter shows that there is a possibility of fostering an enabling and innovative multistakeholder partnership for creating sustainable impact and transformative change with local communities. It argues that the collaborative efforts among district administration, educational institutions and civil society groups in supporting innovation and entrepreneurship can play an extremely important role in livelihood security and empowerment of marginalized sections. The chapter outlines the transformation of a marginalized and underdeveloped district of India. It presents a background of the district with a focus on farmers’ distress and discusses the mode of organization of elites and marginalized peoples under welfare and neoliberal regimes. The chapter also outlines the impact that state–university engagement on the communities. The neoliberal regime made the elite-based cooperatives ineffective, as they came under mismanagement and overexploitation by those in power. Neoliberal reform introduced a new vulnerability among Indian farmers, especially in certain states, such as Maharashtra.
-
This chapter shows that there is a possibility of fostering an enabling and innovative multistakeholder partnership for creating sustainable impact and transformative change with local communities. It argues that the collaborative efforts among district administration, educational institutions and civil society groups in supporting innovation and entrepreneurship can play an extremely important role in livelihood security and empowerment of marginalized sections. The chapter outlines the transformation of a marginalized and underdeveloped district of India. It presents a background of the district with a focus on farmers’ distress and discusses the mode of organization of elites and marginalized peoples under welfare and neoliberal regimes. The chapter also outlines the impact that state–university engagement on the communities. The neoliberal regime made the elite-based cooperatives ineffective, as they came under mismanagement and overexploitation by those in power. Neoliberal reform introduced a new vulnerability among Indian farmers, especially in certain states, such as Maharashtra.
-
The main purpose of this article is to introduce the Social Enterprise Model Canvas (SEMC), a Business Model Canvas (BMC) conceived for designing the organizational settings of social enterprises, for resolving the mission measurement paradox, and for meeting the strategy, legitimacy and governance challenges. The SEMC and the analysis that explains its features are of interest to academics concerned with the study of social entrepreneurship because they offer a new analytical tool that is particularly useful for untangling and comparing different forms of social enterprises. Also, it is of interest to social entrepreneurs, because the SEMC is a platform that can be used to prevent 'mission drifts' that might result from problems emerging from the mismanagement of such challenges. The arguments presented are grounded on scientific literature from multiple disciplines and fields, on a critical review of the BMC, and on a case study. The main features of SEMC that makes it an alternative to the BMC are attention to social value and building blocks that take into consideration non-targeted stakeholders, principles of governance, the involvement of customers and targeted beneficiaries, mission values, short-term objectives, impact and output measures.
-
The main purpose of this article is to introduce the Social Enterprise Model Canvas (SEMC), a Business Model Canvas (BMC) conceived for designing the organizational settings of social enterprises, for resolving the mission measurement paradox, and for meeting the strategy, legitimacy and governance challenges. The SEMC and the analysis that explains its features are of interest to academics concerned with the study of social entrepreneurship because they offer a new analytical tool that is particularly useful for untangling and comparing different forms of social enterprises. Also, it is of interest to social entrepreneurs, because the SEMC is a platform that can be used to prevent 'mission drifts' that might result from problems emerging from the mismanagement of such challenges. The arguments presented are grounded on scientific literature from multiple disciplines and fields, on a critical review of the BMC, and on a case study. The main features of SEMC that makes it an alternative to the BMC are attention to social value and building blocks that take into consideration non-targeted stakeholders, principles of governance, the involvement of customers and targeted beneficiaries, mission values, short-term objectives, impact and output measures.
-
This chapter focuses on co-creation as the way to engage different stakeholders with everyday urban environments based on equality, diversity and social cohesion. It presents the relationship of co-creation and inclusiveness of public open spaces together with different aspects of co-creation related to issues of publicness and space. It discusses why and how co-creation must take into consideration the characteristics of the comprehensive spatial development processes. It suggests that co-creation is a wider concept than co-design and is a multistage process that contributes to inclusive public spaces, providing measures for social sustainability of place. This chapter argues that digital tools may help to overcome challenges of co-creation and provide an opinion on the contribution of digital technologies to the co-creation process by engaging people in the design, use and management of public spaces, providing new resources for interaction and users’ empowerment. For that it presents an overview of the possible contribution of digital technologies to support inclusiveness of the co-creation processes that is structured by typologies of digital tools and their possible interlinking with the steps of the co-creation process. To improve the understanding of such possibilities it critically addresses strengths and weaknesses of using digital tools for co-creation and inclusiveness and provides recommendations for their further development.
-
The United States wastes approximately 40% of its food supply. This article will examine the implications of this waste for food insecurity and climate change. It will also explore how the law and social entrepreneurship can be used to confront this public health challenge.
-
The United States wastes approximately 40% of its food supply. This article will examine the implications of this waste for food insecurity and climate change. It will also explore how the law and social entrepreneurship can be used to confront this public health challenge.
-
Innovation is perhaps the buzzword in local economic development policy. Associated narrowly with neoliberal ideas, conventional notions of innovation—like its capitalocentric counterparts, enterprise and entrepreneurialism—may promise higher productivity, global competitiveness and technological progress but do not fundamentally change the ‘rules of the game’. In contrast, an emerging field reimagines social innovation as disruptive change in social relations and institutional configurations. This article explores the conceptual and political differences within this pre‐paradigmatic field, and argues for a more transformative understanding of social innovation. Building on the work of David Graeber, I mobilize the novel constructs of ‘play’ and ‘games’ to advance our understanding of the contradictory process of institutionalizing social innovation for urban transformation. This is illustrated through a case study of Liverpool, where diverse approaches to innovation are employed in attempts to resolve longstanding socio‐economic problems. Dominant market‐ and state‐led economic development policies—likened to a ‘regeneration game’—are contrasted with more experimental, creative, democratic and potentially more effective forms of social innovation, seeking urban change through playing with the rules of the game. I conclude by considering how the play–game dialectic illuminates and reframes the way transformative social innovation might be cultivated by urban policy, the contradictions this entails, and possible ways forward.
Explorer
Sujet
- Accès gratuit sur inscription (7)
- Action collaborative (3)
- Afrique (2)
- Agriculture (2)
- Amérique centrale/sud (14)
- Amérique latine (33)
- Analyse quantitative (2)
- Animation (2)
- Apprentissage (2)
- Appropriation technologique (1)
- Asie (19)
- Associations (2)
- Australie (8)
- Autochtone (2)
- Base de données (1)
- Bases de données terminologiques (16)
- Big Data (4)
- Biodiversité (1)
- Bioéconomie (2)
- Biotechnologie (3)
- Bourses d'études (8)
- Bourses de stages (4)
- Brésil (4)
- Budget (3)
- Canada (83)
- Canevas (3)
- Centre de recherche universitaire (7)
- Changement (1)
- Changement social (8)
- Changement systémique (3)
- Changements climatiques (4)
- Chine (2)
- Co-construction (15)
- Co-création (50)
- Co-design (4)
- Co-innovation (1)
- Co-production (8)
- Co-promotion (1)
- Coconcevoir (2)
- Collaboration (20)
- Collaboration interorganisationnelle (1)
- Collaboration ouverte (2)
- Collaboration transformatrice (2)
- Colombie (4)
- Commerce (1)
- Commerce équitable (2)
- Communautaire (8)
- Communauté d'innovation (8)
- Communautés (1)
- Communautés de pratique (2)
- Compétences (1)
- Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (4)
- Concepts (3)
- Concertation (4)
- Conférence (2)
- Coopération (6)
- Coopératives (3)
- Coopétition (2)
- COVID-19 (2)
- Créativité collective (2)
- Criminologie (4)
- Culture (2)
- Data (2)
- Data collaboratives (4)
- Data collection (4)
- Décentralisation économique (2)
- Définition (11)
- Délibération (2)
- Déploiement, valorisation, adhésion (1)
- Développement durable (9)
- Développement Durable-Responsabilité Sociale (DD-RS) (8)
- Développement inclusif (2)
- Développement rural (2)
- Développement social (4)
- Développement technologique (2)
- Dialogue (1)
- Digital (9)
- Données massives (2)
- Données ouvertes (8)
- Droit (1)
- Durabilité (11)
- Éco-développement (2)
- Écologie (2)
- Économie (5)
- Économie circulaire (2)
- Économie collaborative (2)
- Économie sociale (16)
- Économie solidaire (9)
- EDI (5)
- Éducation (2)
- Empathie (2)
- Empowerment (2)
- Engagement (2)
- Engagement collectif (4)
- Engagement communautaire (3)
- Enseignement (2)
- Entrepreneurial (6)
- Entrepreneuriat (13)
- Entrepreneuriat social (12)
- Entreprise (14)
- Entreprise sociale (7)
- Équité (2)
- État (2)
- États-Unis (40)
- Ethical, social and environmental accounting (ESEA) (2)
- Éthique (8)
- Éthique de l’IA (2)
- Étude de cas (7)
- Europe (90)
- Évaluation évolutive (2)
- Expérimentation (4)
- Facilitation (1)
- Finance sociale (2)
- Financement (6)
- Focus group (1)
- Fondation (2)
- Fôrets (2)
- Formation (1)
- France (22)
- Francophonie (2)
- Gestion axée sur les résultats (6)
- Gouvernance (4)
- Gouvernement du Canada (14)
- Gouvernement du Québec (6)
- Hackathon (1)
- Healthcare (1)
- Healthy cities (1)
- Histoire (12)
- Human–computer interaction (HCI) (2)
- Idéation, dialogue et maillage (28)
- Impact (9)
- Impact environnemental (2)
- Impact social (5)
- Inclusion (3)
- Indicateur (1)
- Inégalités (4)
- Informatique (4)
- Innovation (36)
- Innovation agile (4)
- Innovation collaborative (15)
- Innovation durable (4)
- Innovation financière (2)
- Innovation frugale (3)
- Innovation inclusive (12)
- Innovation logistique (4)
- Innovation ouverte (10)
- Innovation pédagogique (2)
- Innovation publique (2)
- Innovation responsable (4)
- Innovation sociale (120)
- Innovation sociale durable (2)
- Innovation sociale systémique (2)
- Innovation sociale transformatrice (4)
- Innovation sociétale (1)
- Innovation technique (4)
- Innovation technologique (6)
- Intelligence artificielle (16)
- Intelligence collective (12)
- Intelligence de données (2)
- Intelligence incorporée (2)
- Interentreprises (2)
- International (6)
- Internet (8)
- Internet des objets (6)
- Invention (4)
- Investissement (8)
- Isomorphisme (2)
- Japon (2)
- Justice (2)
- Justice cognitive (1)
- Justice épistémique (1)
- Laboratoire d'innovation sociale (2)
- Laboratoire vivant (22)
- Laboratoires d'innovation (1)
- leader humility (1)
- Leadership (1)
- Libre accès (193)
- Licences d'exploitation (1)
- litterature (2)
- Living Labs (12)
- Living labs (1)
- local ecosystem (2)
- logement (2)
- Magazine (4)
- management scholarship (2)
- marginalization (1)
- McConnell Foundation (2)
- Médialab (1)
- Médias sociaux (4)
- Meilleures pratiques (2)
- Mesure d'impact (35)
- Mesure de la perception (6)
- Mesures (2)
- Méthodes (13)
- Mise en valeur (9)
- Mobilisation (2)
- Mobilisation des connaissances (1)
- Mobilisation et tranfert (1)
- Mobilité (2)
- Modèle (8)
- Modèle d'encadrement (1)
- Modèle de réglementation (2)
- Modèle participatif (2)
- Mondialisation (2)
- Montréal (17)
- MOOC (2)
- Mouvement social (2)
- Municipalités (4)
- Nanoscience (2)
- Négociation (1)
- Nord / Sud (1)
- Normes éthiques (1)
- Nouvelles technologies (6)
- numérique (11)
- Numérique (4)
- Objectifs de développement durable (9)
- OBNL (17)
- OCDE (2)
- ONU (4)
- Open source (1)
- Optimisation (2)
- Organisation apprenante (1)
- Organisme de soutien (96)
- Outdoor free-play (1)
- Outil (1)
- Outil numérique (1)
- Outils (18)
- Ouvrages de référence (14)
- Partage (2)
- Partenariat (22)
- Partenariat avec le patient (2)
- Participation (13)
- Participation citoyenne (4)
- Participation publique (1)
- Participatory Design (2)
- Participatory planning (1)
- Participatory research methods (1)
- Participatory Rural Innovation (2)
- Parties prenantes (2)
- Patient partenaire (1)
- Performances (2)
- Personnes en situation de handicap (2)
- Philanthropie (4)
- Planification (11)
- Pluriversalisme (1)
- Pôle d'innovation (2)
- Politiques (12)
- Politiques publiques (8)
- Pratique (2)
- Premiers peuples (1)
- Problem-oriented innovation systems (1)
- Processus d'innovation (4)
- Processus de création (2)
- Projets participatifs (4)
- Propriété intellectuelle (2)
- Prototypage (2)
- Publication gouvernementale (6)
- Publication UdeM (17)
- Quadruple helix approach (8)
- Québec (118)
- Réalité virtuelle (2)
- Recherche (22)
- Recherche-action (2)
- Recherche-action participative (1)
- Recherche collaborative (1)
- Recherche partenariale (1)
- Recommandations (5)
- Relations industrielles (6)
- Réseau (4)
- Réservé UdeM (312)
- Résilience (2)
- Resource-Based View theory (RBV) (2)
- Responsabilité sociale (4)
- Responsabilité sociétale des entreprises (6)
- Responsible research and innovation (4)
- Revue de littérature (1)
- Risques (2)
- Rôle des universités (69)
- Royaume-Uni (2)
- Santé (25)
- Santé publique (6)
- Scaling-up (2)
- science (1)
- Science industrielle (2)
- Science ouverte (3)
- Science politique (8)
- Sciences de l'éducation (3)
- Sciences économiques (8)
- Sciences sociales (5)
- Scientométrie (2)
- Secteur public (4)
- Service design (2)
- social (6)
- social business (3)
- Social business model (5)
- Social entrepreneur (2)
- Social entrepreneurship (9)
- Social finance (2)
- Social Initiative (1)
- Social intrapreneur (1)
- Social movement organisations (2)
- Social technology (3)
- Sociologie (2)
- Solidarités (2)
- Soutien (4)
- Soutien social (2)
- Start-ups (2)
- Startup ecosystem (6)
- Statistiques (5)
- Subventions (3)
- Subventions - Réglementation (2)
- Suisse (2)
- Sustainability (2)
- systematic review (2)
- Système d'innovation (4)
- Systemic social innovation (2)
- Teams (1)
- Techno-sciences (2)
- Technologie (14)
- Technologie sociale (5)
- Technologies (4)
- Technologies intelligentes (2)
- technosciences (4)
- Territoire (2)
- Théorie (1)
- Théorie de Résolution des Problèmes Inventifs (TRIZ) (2)
- Théorie du changement (4)
- Théorie Néo-Institutionnelle (4)
- Thésaurus de base de données (10)
- Thésaurus de bibliothèque (12)
- Transfert (2)
- Transformation sociale (1)
- Transformations (9)
- Transformations sociales (4)
- Transition (2)
- Transition numérique (2)
- Transport (2)
- Travail social (4)
- Triple Helix (2)
- Triple layered business model canvas (1)
- UK (13)
- Université (58)
- Urbanisme (6)
- Utopie (2)
- Valorisation (2)
- Version libre-accès Academia.edu (1)
- Version libre-accès Open Repository (2)
- Version libre-accès ResearchGate (4)
- Villes (2)
- Villes intelligentes (2)
- Vision collective (2)
- VR (2)
- vulgarisation (1)
- Webinaire (2)
Type de ressource
- Article d'encyclopédie (18)
- Article de colloque (53)
- Article de magazine (4)
- Article de revue (331)
- Billet de blog (51)
- Chapitre de livre (45)
- Document (18)
- Enregistrement vidéo (13)
- Entrée de dictionnaire (13)
- Livre (88)
- Page Web (496)
- Présentation (1)
- Rapport (48)
- Thèse (4)
1. Idéation, dialogue et maillages
- 1.1 Diagnostic (2)
- 1.2 Idéation et animation (13)
- 1.3 Dialogue (22)
- 1.4 Maillage (9)
- -Les incontournables (5)
2. Planification
3. Recherche et développement
4. Déploiement, valorisation, pérennisation
5. Évaluation, retombées et impacts
- 5.1 Théories (9)
- 5.2 Méthodes (9)
- 5.3 Indicateurs (6)
- 5.4 Changements systémiques (5)
- - Les incontournables (5)
Approches thématiques et disciplinaires
Définitions
- Définitions de l'innovation sociale (15)
- - Les incontournables (3)
- Termes liés (15)
- Théories (21)
Organismes de soutien
- 01. Stratégies et politiques (11)
- Amérique centrale/sud (12)
- Canada (20)
- États-Unis (11)
- Europe (22)
- Québec (39)